Jump to content

nap0leonic

Members
  • Posts

    95
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by nap0leonic

  1. will it be on steam?
  2. why do everyone wants FF? as I asked before, does the real modern fly by ware planes have FF? and also for a massive FF peripheral, I think USB won't provide enough electricity and you will need external adapter for that, maybe that's why manufacturers avoid it. CMIIW.
  3. any new news about this X-55?
  4. isn't with all those fly by wires, real planes don't have force feedback anymore? or I'm assuming wrong?
  5. by the looks of it this HOTAS will have twist rudder?
  6. worldwide release date? price estimate?
  7. fair point, but you are missing the point, a benchmark is a standard point against anything else that already existed not something that is yet to exist. so is VRS better than something like Jane's F/A-18? and keep in mind that actually I'm asking about the plane fidelity only, not the sim/environment in which it plugged in... with this, even based on what I only saw I think it's safe to say that VRS is of a superior fidelity than Jane's or any previous F-18 sim so with that alone it's quite worthy as the benchmark for now. I do agree though that they should've ported the VRS into DCS :(
  8. how do you know vrs isn't worthy as a benchmark?
  9. I'm dying to get into DCS in one of the fast mover plane :( how long are we going to have to wait anymore?
  10. good lord, so many f-18 sim are being worked out there, is it that impossible to wish all of them just combine their effort and release it for DCS?
  11. where's my su-27 flaming cliffs module :(
  12. anyone know how many people actually working at ED?
  13. btw, will there be more advanced system on the stand alone Su-27 module other than flight model compared to the current FC3?
  14. eh I thought NASA has released all the data since the project ended in 1996?
  15. no comment, low voters... am I the only one who find this is interesting?
  16. :megalol: nice twist... but seriously... ;)
  17. why do they put such feature as priority?
  18. Do you want DCS to cover for xperimental planes that mainly designed to study flight dynamics such as F-15 ACTIVE, F-18 HARV, F-16XL, X-29, X-31 and such? possible scenario is to use such aircraft for high altitude / extreme manouvering guns only dogfight multiplayer :D or of course, aerobatics. such modules don't have to have full blown war avionics, just give it WVR combat capability and guns :D will you buy such modules?
  19. wrong, yhey are releasing individual fc3 jets as dcs x flaming cliffs separate modules/dlcs, no any version of lock on required.
  20. nice info, glad there is a way to easily do that, but can we use 6 dof system without headtracking? how?
  21. what about exported flankers? is there also no leaked info?
  22. are they ever going to remove it? I want to buy it but I read some saying that the time limit kinda take away some fun in the game.
  23. oh btw is the campaign battle time limit still there?
  24. seeing how many steam user seemingly went nuts about achievements, by nuts I mean here is actually positive, I think it's worth to try, it can certainly help some average joe to try a game/sim more seriously and not easily gave up.
×
×
  • Create New...