Boberro

Moving head toward monitor?

Not only by amount but quality too. Money do difference - you can't skip financial hole and glue to the country which spend on army (tech included) much more than you do. Amount is one of the results of financial and agony disaster of Russian army after USSR collapsing. 20 years after Russia barely starts to improve forces giving more and more precious rubles for army. Slowly they're being improved.

I think it'd be good to implement big notification always when update is being made. User would have to click on it to disappear. Then even biggest n00bs would be informed :D

Most countries invest money in militarism. But US has been doing it for long years and XXXX more intensive than Russia. That gives big gap between Russian and US equipment. What would be the condition of winning? More populated server? If so don't be silly. This is why we see all the time Russian discoveries. Russian new, amazing technologies. This is why we see Russian first stealth prototype 20 years after US, and this is why we see only 1 ship so called "carrier". This is why we see almost same Bulava missile fails and ambitious plans to modernize army.... next ambitious plan because previous one, great one failed again. LOL good joke :D Closer to the real world based on encyclopedia and perhaps wikipedia :D

+1

What does experience player have to do with reality of real missiles? Many experienced pilots like what they believe to be real but it isn't. This mod can be fun to play, can be nice and enjoyable. But don't tell me it is closer to reality. Many people try to put Russian equipment higher than reality proved.

Quite good rig! But I'd reject optical drive. Today you can mostly download BluRays from various nice sites :) I haven't used optical drive for 3 years...

Ka-50 didn't lose its "magic" it didn't have it at start if terms of sell defense devices.

I see good story for Cartoon Network :D

Do you have some source or it is common joke of mighty Russian planes being king of the skies?

BMS has so far much more advanced ATC and comms. Dynamic campaign is just additional feature which is neither good nor bad. Theater is less important I think, especially when we compare quality of DCS theater and BMS one. Even those in DCS which is often just plain, mountains are rectangular is far more attractive than repeated tiles in Falcon. I think some people just can't stand and won't accept that Falcon is closer and closer to the end of its life. Developers can't change ugly graphics that first, second there are some bugs as well in multiplayer. In the past Falcon has been much more attractive compared to the DCS (in overall). Now it changed, DCS evolves, BMS stands in one place. DCS has one big problem - ED's engine is extremely slow. ED is packing new features and it's getting slower and slower........ and slower giving outdateg graphics (compared to Outterra example) and very low FPS on high end computers.

Those ossified guys will stay by BMS, rest with more open minds will choose DCS, especially when an F-15E, F-18 and A-10C are available (add to this F-16 and you have USAF :D). Yes, you can. Ruin dreams :D jk

Give F-16 and plenty of BMS users will come here.

GheyTen has been made for slow flight stay over the target. By that it can turn better. Frogfoot is fast striker to attack some points and run away.

I hope that new thing will be truly multi core capability engine which will bring really nice graphics.

Well they wouldn't be so pissed off if they made good net code earlier. Multiplayer issues belong even to LO1.

Who cares :D Everybody knows US debt, UK and other enormous are not to be paid back.

Sometimes you were hit at high altitude and slowly dropped. It'd be ridiculous to wait few minutes till crash and hit message would come in. So people just take new plane - and sometimes it takes score for your attacker sometimes not. If not so sorry, brutal life :) Precisely ED would fix that by the way. ED also could change kill message to the old FC1 one where there was shown attacker plane and victim one. Now you don't know what attacker was, what if USS Enterprise? :D

And play by yourself, exclusively in two :D

No it doesn't look cool either nice. It is acceptable but far from nice :P

Piece of crap.

I liked it. Nicely made :)

For DCS series T\TM would be more useful. SM even doesn't have TV pod like A-10C has or even old and poor Shkval which is crappy but helps a lot in 25T\TM. KM is fanstasmagoria :P

Yes you are right. When turning it is better to move radar toward our turn direction for faster detection :) Radar is stabilized so your conclusion is right too.

Well, Su-27SM is interesting, however it seems to odd Russian could spare manual for true representation of Flanker in the game. I understand old and rusty Ka-50, perhaps Su-22, MiG-27 and Su-27S which are grandpas too. But Su-27SM is quite new and Russians like to keep they toys hidden. F-16 would be just orgasm one after another.... finally BMS in the DCS World.... hell yeah!