Random

Also having rudder issues... though its more a lack of track change. Can swing the nose around lots but at max deflection it stabilises on a heading and refuses to actually alter the track of the aurcraft.

AFAIK Gr.7 was in service up until 2006 ish... when the Gr.9 was introduced. That's still gonna be classified!

Definately need some form of IFF... Afaik all dcs modules fudge it since its all rather classified!

Great news. Finally a high fidelity harrier sim! My only worry is how accurate the systems can be. Gr.7 and 9 are very recent!

AND ITS UP! Everyone hurry and run your updater!

Currently running DCS_Updater.exe every minute.....

I got a Beer Fridge... Plus the beer to go in it!

The NTTR map is payware. For the free map you need to install either the regular dcs 1.2.something or the open beta 1.5.2

Gr.9 would be nice. Or Gr.7 but I suspect access to data may be an issue. If Razbam could find a way through that I'd love to see either in DCS. A Gr.3 might be a good option though. Shouldn't be too much classified data on it!

Don't know if I mentioned it to you before Hegykc but "spitsim" might be a good UK partner for you. They do a stick wich is designed to take different stick tops (currently only 2 standard ones though). I have one with a logitech G940 top grafted on. They might be interested in an expanded range!

Any chance of a bare metal and painted specular layer? So we can choose ultra shiny or just normal painted shiny?

I would not object.

I kind of get where Crumpp is coming from. Perhaps the ideal solution would be a mission editor setting to allow either a percentage fill or just tanks as per the OP. Percentage fill for "air quake" servers. Per tank for more historical scenarios. Though I personally would like to be able to fill as a percentage per tank. Get to see how much a full rear tank with NOTHING in the wings in a mustang messes things up!

No need to eject ;) did this to 3 F5's the other day! No real damage.

The nukes are rather buggy... Dropping one on an airfield pretty much means you need to restart the mission... it's very open to griefing.

My wishlist, pick one and I'll be happy! 1: English Electric Lightning (Though VEAO hope to do this one) 2: Saab Draken 3: F-104 4: Mig19 5: Mirage III I like my 2nd gen jets ;)

In at front out at top. It's a compromise though as it means the top rad gets warmed air pulled through it. Once I move house I'll be going back to my 9x120mm rad and external reservoir. Much neater plumbing is possible then.

I'm using a Corsair Carbide 540 with a front mounted 3x120mm rad and top 2x140mm. It copes with a de-lidded Haswell i7 @ 4.5ghz and pair of gtx 780 ti's without much trouble! I'd not want to run less that a 3x120mm for CPU plus GPU. Ideally more.

Gotta admit the Draken is the Saab I lust after... I wonder how the Swedish Datalink compared to the one developed but never used in the UK for the Lightning which was pretty basic. You say it was digital? The lightning system was analogue, Incredible to think that these systems actually existed back in the 60's using pre solid state electronics. Most people think it only became possible with solid state and microprocessors in the 80s

Tbh viggen ticks all the boxes but its fun to come up with other theories....

Tomcat already announced.... so first pic doesnt count.

Oh it's normal for some... just not aviation ones ;)

no no no. English Electric FTW

I'd not be tooo upset if LN steal VEAO's thunder and announce a Lightning. Theres plenty of variants to go around!

In the september update Cobra says they are working on new aerodynanic configurations and propulsion + force distribution.... Obviously