MiloMorai

A much more detailed manual than the one already posted. http://www.avia-it.com/act/profili_daerei/libretti_velivolo/PA_libretti_PDF/Fighter_Gun_Harmonization.pdf

It say 'Ordinarily ......' which means there is there is possible ranges settings between 250yds and 350yds. Knowing how how much to turn the adjustment screw for changing from 250yds to 350yds would allow convergence ranges between the two.

Once again your reading comprehension lets you down Crumpp. The P-47 could have the convergence set anywhere from 250yds to 350yds. http://s888.photobucket.com/user/Corsican_Corsair/media/P47-2.jpg.html Note this is from the P-47 manual. So the pilot would tell the armorer he wanted his convergence at say 300yds and the armorer would adjust the guns for 300yds convergence. Also during the BoB, RAF fighter pilots changed the convergence from what was the RAF standard at the time.

"most of the pilots would try to get the armorer to tell them where in front of the airplane they wanted the bullets to converge" Or 'hey Joe I want my convergence to be at 300 yards'. Definitely 'custom' convergence tho I think with a little more research that it will be found that the convergence could be set anywhere over a 100 yards distance (that is, from say 250yds to 350yds).

Elmo, what is a Hs219?

The wing of the P-47N were not clipped but extended from 40'9" of the P-47D to 42'7".

Figure 32 says compressibilty recovery flaps and the flap is labled DIVE FLAP:shocking:.

T-34 http://chris-intel-corner.blogspot.ca/2012/07/wwii-myths-t-34-best-tank-of-war.html fastfreddie is this the video?

Yes!!

European Air War (1998 ) had solders that could be shot at.

German AFV production 1939-45 Here are detailed production statistics for German armored vehicles. Source is ‘Waffen und Geheimwaffen des deutschen Heeres 1933 – 1945’. http://chris-intel-corner.blogspot.gr/2013/05/german-afv-production-1939-45_7.html

As Chizh is requesting WWII equipment info and no discussion is allowed on any of the equipment mentioned, I am starting this thread on what equipment should/shouldn't looked at to be included. Only equipment that was manufactured in high numbers should be included due to the time and effort in making these vehicles. For example, low numbers, only 87(or 105) Wirbelwinds were made, contrary to only 44(or 43) Ostwinds produced from July 1944 to March of 1945 and there was never enough to properly equip front line units.

http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=116391&highlight=Bf109G-6&page=23 Post #229 which mentions another discussion.

The Horten brothers built over 30 all wing gliders and 6 motorized all wing a/c. Not to say there isn't any wind tunnel data but I have never came across any reference of the brothers using a wind tunnel. How much data on an obscure a/c like the Horten can there be when the Bf109G-6, or Bf109G-14, couldn't be modeled because of a lack of data?

Shouldn't that be F-9

Definitely 2 different a/c. One was made by Douglas (A-26) and the other made by Martin (B-26).

A history of MH434. http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?20097-MH434-And-Her-Many-Guises near the bottom of the 1st page, As H-105 RNethAF, Semerang Dutch East Indies - December 1948

But the pressure differential is used to 'calculate' the flow volume.

As long as it is only flat turns, as P-47s out turned 109s.

What real Spitfire is being used for modeling the virtual Spitfire?

In March, the entire squadron was moved to Gilze-Rijen and then in April, to Nijmegen. The Meteors flew armed reconnaissance and ground attack operations without encountering any German jet fighters. By late April, the squadron was based at Faßberg, Germany. It should be noted that many RAF pilots did their tours and never saw a German a/c.

Nice but shouldn't this be in the Dora forum not the Project Discussion form?

The K-4 had already been mentioned in the thread with not so factual info.