xhaos

Congrats to all the people involved in development! Thank you for an amazing product. Now go get drunk!!!!!!

Just like IRL all would be able to do both, not as good to both though. also from my days in virtual sqns, i guess there will be permanent couples. On a side note, I have spoken to many of my friends over time for such a possibility, and many of them told that they would prefer to fly back seat for many reasons, such as: can't dogfight, more fun to be the shooter etc...

it would be really really amazing, but with all the classification involved with its avionics, it wouldnt be anywhere near the level of the BS or the warthog.

please do Ah-64 or F16 and don't re-redo su25, otherwise I warn you, I will divide by zero!

It depends, If ED is willing to commit right now resources for AG radar modeling or not? If NOT then i really would like the AH64A or Su27 if YES then F16, so that finally Falcon 4.0 can stop jumping out of its grave.

Its a shame, I really hope next module will include this and what it will at least be back ported to BS and A10.

What they will choose to model next will depend 100% on how comfortable they are now with developing AG radar. My money and hopes ride that next will be the AH64A model.

Now that the 6-months ban has ended, are we allowed to talk about what happened or not even this? I say this because i suspect many people (including myself) have questions-thought regarding what happened 6 months ago.

you realize you are just asking to get ripped off.

thanks for this amazing tool!!!! Have you ever thought of going under GPL license so more people will have opportunity to get involved? I for one would love to contribute to the networking parts of the SW.

@muamshai your quote is from movie Flight of the Intruder source: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0099587/quotes

@yeepeekai I OWE YOU BEERS!!!!

downloading now........i cant stop my self from crying

i think we just did a DOS attack on your site!!!

in russian it says too much international trafic so they closed the download

cant access it. can someone put it on rapidshare?

yep Gia na leo oti uphretisa sthn 116:)

Does his signature include a ka52 and a su25? :lol:

also in my opinion the demo should include a bit of weather so we will not try everything in a textbook sunny day without any wind etc. I think the scenario of the A10 quick start mission of lock on is idea for this, though we should start landed and cold!

116FW doesnt have any yet or at least it didnt have while i was serving there.

Mirage 2000!!!!!!!

if we go that far back i can say: Harrier Attack on Amstrad 464!

janes series! for its time period it was amazing!

that bring us to a second question. Always in games its harder to eyeball targets because of HW limitation. In real life depending on conditions you can see a fighter plane easily at 8km and even make out some details, at 15km if you are lucky and i remember once this summer i managed to follow with eyes one helicopter even though i was more than 30km away (though it was an orange ericsson). But in sims i always had to use labels cause otherwise i felt ceated against the AI. What do you think about this?

this sounds a bit strange (or i am reading something wrong) if a tank is moving it should be easier to spot since it will have smoke, movement etc. if it stationary its camouflage should make it harder to see since its camouflage will be under the wavelength noise.