siipperi

Im so gonna wait for get sabre modded in ww2 campaign. :music_whistling:

Modern tanks have camera periscopes and some that doesn't those don't need them anyway. Gaining significant advantage with submarine type of periscope is pretty minimal on most conditions. There is reason why there is scout infantry.. And rl experience: driving and commanding a tank with just prisms is pretty fun. But to contrast driving with old russian infrared nvg is the worst experience ever... You barely see anything and fov and fisheye effect makes it almost impossible to judge real distances on nature. On bright nights I must say I would drive my head out of cockpit than use that old nvg technology. Ofc it's totally different thing with modern nvgs. And driving with prism isnt so hard as many seem to think. You get used to it really quickly and modern tanks have waay better fov and prism placements than tanks that I have driven.

Yes and no. I think majority of 3rd party devs aren't just big enough and dont have experience to dev dcs level sim as fast as we consumers would want. Thanks for update to update Wags.

Excellent and sad, especially for us who are waiting Hornet over ww2-line. Hipefully ED can hire more ppl for this project and hornet wouldnt get pushed more to the future... Remember why DCS is as strong brand as it's nowdays, because of us jetheads supporting it. :joystick: And about screenshots: indeed it looks like realtime reflection on gauges! Cant wait for 1.3.0 :thumbup:

That looks exactly like on his rift

If we get most planes + map to play with before the end of the year im happy. Well, Im happy just with Me262. :cry:

I wouldn't. It took ages for competitor to show any map screenshots of eastern front. Sure ww2 map have been under dev about 7-9 months but remembering those early pictures from last autumn I would actually wait few more months before releasing actual ingame/mapviewer screenshots but agreed, it would be neat to show us some 3d models of buildings and other probs that they have made. That would be typical bf109/fw190 screenshots that they have been posting for past who knows how long. Maybe this long silence is mark that we might see actual in game video soon. :music_whistling: (or russians liking their holidays too much. ;) )

I think this is pretty legit question: does it have PFM?

I think this is excellent news for people that make living from this kind of stuff (youtube + live streaming). Might suck for people that play illegal music on live streams but that shouldn't even happen on the first place. If this means easier following for live streaming via google integrations I'm all in personally.

I think you need to broadcast your SPI to your wingman in order him to attack the target.

Nope. :huh:

Both from ED website I would assume, like he said. Yeah, give track so people can help you.

Massive physic based destruction in dcs on top of massive ai load and plane physic load? DCS can't even sync current flight model without some jerkiness here and there, now add some futuristic dynamic destruction...

Trolling? But ye, you aint going to win war with su 35, so that's about it..

Or 2015. Strange lens flare. I like airfield lighting, better than current one. I just hate those pitch black airfields that we have in georgia. No matter if there is war or not I hate it. :smilewink: Make a blast ED, MiG21, Hawk, Nevada/EDGE for summer!

But as we have seen those release goals for different stages have been really late and that have been fact so far. Hopefully they pick it up. No matter if end product is pure gold, false promises always left sour taste to mouth and that's not how you run business. Personally I don't want get half baked plain wrong flightmodel for 109 even if i had chance to alpha test it, let them properly dev it, give extra few months and experience will be way better.

Not sure if it's right place but here we go: I think ED should update steam page to mention free TF51D http://store.steampowered.com/app/223750/

Don't want to be smart 4ss but moon isn't orbiting earth on that altitude. And your screenshots looks to be during the day time, so another weak point in your agrument. Are you sure that sun didn't drop though? :megalol:

Can't wait to fly 262. That's going to be so awesome!

Thanks for the update Wags. Good luck to team to integrate Nevada and EDGE to DCS. Can't wait..

And TF version have different cockpit frame as I said previously.

Ahaa, I see. Why call it TF51D then? Don't want to be picky. :music_whistling: Maybe less confusion to people like me. ;)

Judging internet TF51D have larger cockpit frame than P51D. Im not specialist but just judging pictures. http://fighter-collection.com/cft/tf-51d-mustang-miss-velma-2/ TF51D http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=513 P51D So we are getting some strange modification with orginal cockpit glass?

Shouldn't TF51D have longer cockpitclass than on P51D? they are identical now...

Updating! Anyone can link TF51D pic/video meanwhile? :)