Djent33

Not to mention FC3 against the MIG.

Mig-21bis 1972, is good for Air to Ground and worth it just for that alone, however Wiki quote says: “The delta wing, while excellent for a fast-climbing interceptor, meant any form of turning combat led to a rapid loss of speed. However, the light loading of the aircraft could mean that a climb rate of 235 m/s (46,250 ft/min) was possible with a combat-loaded MiG-21bis not far short of the performance of the later F-16A. Given a skilled pilot and capable missiles, it could give a good account of itself against contemporary fighters. Its G-limits were increased from +7Gs in initial variants to +8.5Gs in the latest variants.” IMO if it was operated in numbers like an Air force under CGI and used its radar for launching only, it would be a threat to the 4th gen fighters and would get its kills more so over defensive territory.

ß -^-à They did no such thing.

Greetinitings! I’ve been thinking about a feature that could enhance task coordination via radio transmissions. We have existing methods and features in ME to obtain tactical information via AWACS, EWR, Radio transmission from a zone. EWR didn’t work for blue side the last time I checked, AWACS/EWR represents a house with “lights on” but no body home. “Radio transmission from zone” could potentially be much better as this works with conditions and this is how I see an operation in ME to provide instructions and info via radio freq. A mission designer can create a mission with probabilities and chances but how many audio files can be recorded for any given instance and then be packed into a mission? IMO clients shouldn’t load audio files but use stock files if and when ME designer has ability to implement. ONCE>CONDITION>TRIGGER Using stock audio and extensive pop up form to fill for radio transmission. Form example: 1) Airborne unit in zone [ Get info of visible and radar radius]>radio says-- nil, RTB or BRA 2)-- 3)-- 4)-- ..)…..

From the movie: "It's one thing the simulator c#n't-------give you":D

:megalol:

.:D

Is WWII map OK?

What should the action be for the aircraft who sit on the runway or take off in the opposite direction? Kills.

Did U play DayZ whole year?

I don’t believe U.

A Jupiter colliding with the Sun would also do that.

bye

Dear godfather I wish u well, try F-190 next time.

It’s only a matter of time before someone makes a “squirrel/office guy” simulator. (NSWTF)

Yes but they don’t transmit realistic video surveillance and targeting data for the ground force commander which is undesirable, because it would be more challenging experience of plotting targets for some. Taking chances and ejecting is easier.

Who broke the landing light? The ground crew may need an apology.

In MP a human F-16 is better then AI, unless it’s not true.

What I’ve just read I can’t unread.

I’m not sure but I’ve seen the big ships were being controlled with a little thingy. Maybe a finger joystick is some thing to consider?

Nice indeed. I like this plane, it makes me a pilot and not the other way around. It was designed to be used in large numbers for that time with GCI. “Zebra Lion” Strategy maybe worth a test to see. 2 x Mig-29A vs. 4 x Mig-21bis & then 3 x Mig-29A vs. 6 x Mig-21bis All with coms and CGI could be a simulation.

You fly and lie as well?

You buy modules and never fly them? Not much to do just sit in the cockpit and enjoy?

I’m a f#ing liar.

Seems like a reasonable find, the clocks a going forward soon anyway.