Ktulu2

Wags is active, but he doesn't says anything about modules, but it was just to prove that wrong.

Well, ed would be very bad if this was the case.

I read that some mig-21 can carry normal missiles (R-77, R-27 and R-73), wich could be intersting to simulate some missions in the '80s. I doubt this will be devellop, but can anyone confirm it? edit : wiki link : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-21#Specifications_.28MiG-21-93.29

Well...Soon there will be as much as DCS products : DCS : KA-50, A-10C, P-51 and FC3 (not full modules so i'll count it as one) BST : MI-8, F-86, Huey (I won't count cobra as its not a done) RRG : 1plane (don't remember wich one) VEAO : HAWK Leatherneck : mig-21 3rd parties are coming pretty hard and the amount of modules will increase by 66% after the summer :) (I just wish they were 80's, but thats me)

It gives you wind also (or is it when you lans?)

This works when you like cas, but if you are an A2A guy (like me) you' re stuck on the f-15/su-27 which are nice to fly (or will be) but are missing what makes DCS, so until the F-18 (or F-15E in the eventuallity it's almost done (LOL)) we are stuck on 2 options : trying a slow plane wich is a flying target or playing in an incomplete plane :cry: (but still when I saw the F-15 6 monts ago, I thought it was AMAZING, coming from Blazing angels or HAWKS world with BASIC controls and 3rd view.

I have no info on this, but I highly doubt it : one of the big challenges for the F-18 is the A2G radar, and I see no reason why ED would have spent time simulating it. I think it works more like Kh-58 (or wathever the actual name is) : you see the sources emiting radar, but no more, but this is just a guess.

That doesn't work for me

agreed

Most games also release game not working/unplayable because of poor planification too. But I completly agree I can't think of how happy I would be if there was a date for the F-18. We can always dream lol.

As cichlidfan said, plus I' afraid of dcs turning in «blazing angels/gta» or other arcade, as one musn't expect console users to use joystick.

I'm retarded...you posted in a-10c lol

A-10A ou A-10C

A or C?

DCS : Arrow... god I'd love that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avro_Canada_CF-105_Arrow

F-15 all the way until F-18. When F-18 appears, I'll disappear from social life XD.

Thank you :)

To what I know, the He 162 was the first «ejection seat». Although it was VERY simple : the under of the seat was reinforced, so if you were to eject, you had to put a nade under the seat after oppening the canopy XD. This was due to the fact that the engine was on top of the plane, making a «jumping out» exit as bad as crashing cuz you'd get sucked into the reactor.

Hi, I'd like to know about dcs pods and their functions. I know the TGP, but there is 3/4 more pods you can use. But those pods do not appeir in the manual (except the travel pod, that is completely useleff if I understood right). I looked for an answer on the forum, encyclopedia manual, but didn't find anything. If there's already a thread on this just post me the link. :) In short I want a list of the pods and their usage.

There is no 1 fan 770, only 2 or 3 fans versions.

May I ask why 2 fans, I'm considering upgrading me too to a 770

They do make a differance, but what I'd like is to run AA etc from the gpu, so that I get GREAT graphics. Even with the driver I'm really far from that.

I'll try it, but I doubt i'll make a big enough differance keep that card.

Just to know, do you think my cpu is good? If DCS took use of multi-threading, then it would sure be, be as it is un-OC, is it good to have the kind of improvement you talked about?

Just realised I didn't ask anything... So is that setup going to be ok? is a 770 overkill and should I get a 760 instead?