BadHabit

Still they have more important and long lasting issues to fix and the canopy is not really a game breaking one. We have seen many too many artistic fixes, I believe that their priority now should be the improvement of the flight model and many systems as the gunsight..

Uncheck the cockpit localization option in special options menu and restart. You can use them normal after that.

Played 2 missions today. Working fine and really fun. Would wish that the airbases selection was different so we could utilize tacan for the f5. Nice work tho Sent from my iQE100 while I was inverted

Congrats m8! Let the battles begin!:thumbup::pilotfly::pilotfly::pilotfly:

Btw guys, Rudel has stated on LN's bug tracker that glass won't be changing any time soon or never. So yeah ernie's solution works great for me at least right now. The artistic solution of LN, as it may not satisfy me and others is this and I will respect it but I will keep using mods to make it combat ready.

:thumbup:

:thumbup: Thanks! keep working on this Special bird!

Same here. A friend of mine tho same version but no problems. Which files should we seek for him to share with me so we can fix that? Sent from my iQE100 while I was inverted

After several attempts of repairing and tries. I cannot get the course index to work at all. The only movement I get, is when the generator is off, stays at 12 o'clock position and when on at 6 o'clock. Waypoints work as normal, range and fuel tapes show normal, compass rotates normal but course index (yellow index) stays neutral at 6o'clock..

I think he is quite right. Sent from my iQE100 while I was inverted

Yes I might have, Still my hopes are on seeing some adversary's to add vs the NATO fleet they are building.

All the aircraft they mention are NATO use..I am really disappointed by the approach. Since DCS has not and won't offer a dynamic Campaign Generator and AI is in general in a very poor state, they should push all efforts on adversary aircraft! It is mandatory in the state the sim is atm. F-4, F-5, F-14, F-18, A-10C, AV8, AJS37, F-86, M2C vs what? Mig21 and Mig-15? And all of this in a "sandbox"? That is no sandbox, that is NATO aircraft dispaly museum..

Bombers, attackers etc..

Finally guys you showed up! Thanks for the update!

Ground clutter is on thing. Yes it is limited as well as F-5 etc but i am talking about the limitation of the antenna to look down at all farther than the 1.5 dgr. The cone is blocking that movement. AFAIK

That is actually a limitation of the nosecone, more than a radar feature.

Thread ruined. RIP

Guys please, keep this thread clean! Maverick has some true points to make in this thread and they are being shadowed by meaningless comments of hate and wish. Please you have the option to cry every place you need, just keep highly informative post like Mavericks clean! fcol

Try end play with the threshold settings so that the led don't fade when you turn your head. You have a lot of settings to play with. I use OpenTrack and its the best software atm I know. What SQ said above. This server is all about it. Plus high altitude fights are happening there which includes contrails, now you only have to IFF the target before you squiz.

I build mine hd in 20mins with primitive tools. Some carbon, 3 led, AAA batteries. salvaged cables tape and glue. The most expensive was the ps3 cam for 15euro. Go to free track website and you will find numerous builds. Sent from my iQE100 using Tapatalk

Why don't you just w8 for the F-18 and leave the rest of us metalheads with our primitive ac's in our own era? Me no like you.

I can say true to point 1 and 2. 3 is wrong.

:badmood:Was having great fun on the server just now, but a lightning storm created electricity issues. I feel sorry for the guy that followed me all the way to my targets and minutes before a good fight would take place, saw me disappearing from thin air...:badmood: Was fun tho. may try later when the storm settles..

Right now this is the best perfomance server i have flown ever. I have one question. Is it possible to add units like flak and AAA from assets pack? And how this affects users that don't own the module?? Sent from my iQE100 using Tapatalk

That page was way before the split and there is no info on that regard anywhere on the official site, Maybe in the Bugtracker? (unless i'm blind, which is a possibility). Anyway. Ofc I fully agree that we need to push as far as we can so they finish the product, there is no one fan, hater or enthusiast that feels ok with the situation. I just hope we won't go to the other side and see stories like before with other teams. End 200% yes there is a huge need for a structure of a fully Development Log that must be required from every dev team.