Teknetinium

Sharing same cockpit in multiplayer is why I got UH-1 and MI-8 in first place, So I really waiting for this new breakthrough in DCS where we can have several clients in same aircraft. I need someone to unload potatoes from the back doors.

Its worth to celebrate amount flyable aircraft we have in DCS. Su-27S Su-25A Su-25T Mig-29S Mig-29A Ka-50 Mi-8 F-15C A-10A A-10C UH-1 P-51 CA - vehicles Can't wait for Su-27/F-15 AFM together with some bug fixes.

Watch from 2:22, MIG-29U Vertical Scan in action.

:helpsmilie:

Thouse modes which are most effective in combat should be applied in FC3, because we can not switch between them. Like it has been said before TWS in auto lock just doesn't work in combat if VS is more effective in auto lock it should stay that way.

I was incorrect there, The order is not more than 55 SM there will be more Su-35, around 140. It doesn't matter that it only one or two squad that are using them it has been like that since the development of Su-30MKI. I rather play by same rules and by same timeframe where we can judge pilot skills and not politics and wallets.

http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=1853413&postcount=778 http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=1853639&postcount=781

I'm sure there is, but that doesn't matter in a simulator. if ED took warplane approach and charge for etch aim-120 they would get millionaires in a weekend:)

Su-27SM 241 fighters :)

Yes, But if you combined all squads of Su-27SM/SM3/Su-30M/Su-34/Su-35 they will have more modern fighters than many EU countries together + on top off that they still have Su-27S.

This is what I have been saying, F-15C in FC3 is from 1996 whit AIM-120C. While Su-27 is based on 1986, 10 years difference, still some want to push even more. No wonder people are screaming for something modern on Russian side or keep it to same timeframe. There was many squads that had their stock Su-27/33S upgraded to test today's Su-27SM/SM3/Su-37/Su-35. But that was only testing because no funds was there to buy them.

It says in MIG-29 manual that you need to hold the lock button in vertical scan until the target is locked, when target is locked the lock button can be realised. The vertical scan in FC3 will keeps its effectiveness If it is intended to be like it say in the MIG-29 manul. I hope we will not have to realise the button to get a lock, that will be wrong!!! http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=1853128&postcount=763

Dosent sound logic at all AIM-9 autolock when it see heat-source, So should ET or give a tone that it tracks a target, EOS has more features them AIM-9 and ET together. Ill get back when I know more about it.

Ill get back you Nate. Thank you.

Now vertical scan is about to get broken as well. Where is the logic!!! Vertical scan should do it automatically, TWS manualy!!! Could someone tell me plz why vertical scan in Su-27 will not lock automatically?

http://on.rt.com/au7iuz

watch from 3:11. Old but still good.

Would be great to have DCS world in Outerra :)

Agree, sustained speed is what counts.

LOL, Why does it get so hot that you need to cool it? And what do you do if you can not cool it enough? I guess i already told you. Its funny how you try to prove me wrong, cooling is needed because blades are spinning too fast.

Im wrong then :)

That is another problem you face when you reach that high speeds which is connected to fast spinning . To go around it you can make bigger engine so it doesn't spin that fast witch reduce the cooling problem ;)

Im not fighting Im just saying that F-22 and T-50 has same design approach. And that this aircrafts are too small to make speeds of MIG-31 or Blackbird. Smaller wheel spins faster than the big one, as faster it spins as bigger load on construction, I don't need internet to understand that. I don't agree with you that missile will solve all the problems. It seems I was right, because missile don't track as good as they were FC1.