Teknetinium

Or make ECM like it was in FC1 where opponents could break a lock by turning jammer as fast and as much they wanted. At least ECM were useful against ER-27 long range shots and against F15s TWS.

Difference between AIM-120 and ER-27 guidance is top secret, we just can not get any info on how good this missile are against chaff or how good they track the target in different conditions. The only thing we know and do base our assumption on is that AIM-120 is newer missile, But we don't know by how much AIM-120 track better,Its up to ED to decide. I would recommend as a hardcore simulator enthusiast to make the tracking differences minimal because AIM-120 have already obvious edge in being active. Difference in tracking should not be that noticeable. At the moment we as 51st can not confirm exactly how ER-27 behaves against AIM-120, but we are working on it and testing ER-27 against AIM-120C with the latest missile data file.

This setting on chaff resistance need to some attention because if only one missile miss like ER-27 but not Aim-120C we get a problem that pilots start to exploit this instead making maneuver that are needed to avoid the missile. Aim-120 already have the the edge because it is active, making it track better than ER will not make this simulator more realistic because only those who fight against Aim-120 will have to make proper maneuvers to avoid the missile by going 90° notch while those who fight ER-27 can avoid the missile more than often by just going 45°. That is not Acceptable and do not make this simulator more realistic at all. And if you believe so its only a bias assumption that can not be proven so why even go there and make more mess by giving to big differences on how good different missiles track the target. The difference should be minimal if ER have a lock against active Aim-120 because there is no prove that says anything else. Rather than that Aim-120 is a newer missile and it can be debatable by by how much Aim-120 should track better. If you ask me as a hard core simulator enthusiast I would make the difference minimal because Aim-120 have already a edge in being active. Putting to big differences on guiding will just make people stop use ER-27 as they did in FC2. I don't want the community to start finding the settings Su-27 and F-15 could fly against eachother, It's better that ED make it right from the start so we don't get FC2 situation.

No One believe that a developer can make a bug free simulator/game, it is impossible. FC1 and FC2 was crashing as well but we were able to pinpoint the reason of the crash and try to prevent it next time. By not log in to server 40 people at the same time. Have a limit on moving target and a limit on how many units we could have in a mission. In FC3 we have problems to pinpoint the problem. The missions are lighter than they were in FC2, we fly whit less people on servers and we are not using CA. There is a lot of testing still needed to find the new limits in FC3 but its very unmotivating when the server is crashing for reasons we can't understand. Its even silly to talk about Su-27 EOS and TWS when we have bigger problems on the table. Good luck ED, We All just want you to succeed because we see the potential.

And fuel tanks plz :)

Will this get imported in to DCS world? We don't want issues whit those who do not use the mod. Great mod by the way.

Since FC3 realise, is considered as darkest time in EDs history on all fronts. Im sure ED are aware about our feelings and are working on it. But I do understand some of us, especially the multiplayer community and squads that have been keeping the multiplayer community alive by supporting whit servers, missions and events are on their last breath, the motivation is just not there anymore, Its hard to motivate people with dreams that we all have been waiting for more than a year. I wish ED best luck since I had great time when FC1/2 was working, and I hope ED can bring us back what they took away. EDs "Perestrojka" don't have fuel for the multiplayer community.

Since FC1 on till today I have been following this forums daily. During this time I have been in many disputes with one and another where the bottom line have alway been by both part to improve this amazing simulator to more realistic and more immersive experience. I would like to thank ED for their work and everyone in this forums who could bear with me all this years by calibrating my 1111th post:)

why not :)

51st have to restart our DCS public server around every 3 hours where we do run minimal missions. Thank Frostie to have the patience to restart it.

I hope ED get their own server. That will give more attention to MP and might bring back MP stability to FC1 level at least. If ED had a server as it is now they would be overwhelmed with post regarding MP.

Why is ED lagging behind with all the bugs and stability issues!!! Get stability problems solved so we can start use this models as intended, in dynamic multiplayer campaigns. Where we can have human CA generals, choppers, fighters and bombers feel that they are changing the outcome of the battlefield. We are waiting patiently for ED to solve the stability problems so we can have at least 15vs15 people in a server using different models and doing different tasks without server crashing. SP grows old pretty fast if you have experienced dynamic multiplayer campaigns. At the moment DCS is not stable enough for the community to arrange such events:( By the way. UH-1 and Mi-8 are great models, Belsimtek should be proud!!! I never believed I would enjoy to fly M-8 that much, Its like those old cars with soft suspension.

I don't find that ED/Belsimtek had any responsibilities to us who got Mi-8 for full price even if the sale was next day and not after two weeks. Its their choice and that might bring in some more cash to the company involved. I believe the company is losing on it on the long run since many might switch over to get their products on sales. Then again we do get more people who would not get the model at all so the is a hard one to tell which is more beneficial for the company. But that ED is compensating us for wanting the model as soon it is out is very generous.

Will it be released for PC?

Wish youall the best!!! Cant wait.

Belsemtek try to have more faith in your products!!! UH-1 and Mi-8s AFM have good quality. But then again I do understand all the dollers are needed as fast as Belsemtek can get them, they need to pay the bills while they are working further. Good news by the way.

Go in to DCS_updater properties and change goal line to ---> amics\DCS World\bin\DCS_updater.exe" update <--- That will change the updater to update every time you doubleclick on DCS_updater.

Mi-8

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

I find it silly when some compere numbers, it like who is pissing longer, again its silly to compare 7US carriers against 1 Russian kuznecov. The main thing is that Russians have the technology to develop products that compete with US and EU and have been doing it for more than 40 years. Having the world's first space station "MIR" shows what they are capable of.I guise space-technology is as high-tech it can get.

Question appears, why has there not been any map developers for FC and DCS? Because they could not charge for the work since it is based on FC/DCS? or is there no tools?

PLZ I want to be transfared to Corsica, we could fly to Nice or Cannes from there.

Around 50-100 bucks is reasonable even for DCS standard if you ask me. Then again, we all live in different locations of the world with different values on bucks.