x39crazy

Here's hoping it gets re-released!

Got a PSD/XCF for it?

I disagree? Why not put the virtual dongs and ruler away and get some evidence in here. Right now this is just "I don't like it!" To which the appropriate response is "So what?"

Why so focused on the 8th Air Force if every other mustang user used 67"? ETA: Talking about the mustang being our best fighter...I think you're forgetting we're getting two spitfires.

But the 67" we have would be correct for the 15th Air Force right? Performance wise not 3d

Relegated eh? Zemkes wolf pack would disagree. More kills than any other 8th AF fighter group. Fact is it was just better at it, and still a top of its game fighter. The mustang was just a flying gas tank.

Oh she is! She definitely feels like an older airframe than the -51 or 190, something from a different era, but the old girl still competes!

Hey that ju88 is invaluable! Even if as nothing more than a static ground target for marauding ground strafing mustangs! We need every bit of ww2 content we can get and you're a saint for publishing it!

Wonderful! Thanks so much!

Sure hope we see something soon!

+1 subscribed...

This is a great idea that I hope comes to fruition!

Well it depends on where you fly it. At higher speeds ala where the P-51D lives I find it to be an absolute joy to fly.

There's also something to be said for the ease of handling in the mustang. It responds sooooooooo well and smoothly to input that's it's just a dream to fly. I prefer the 109, always have always will, but it is such a constant pain in my 4th point of contact. The mustang feels like it responds to your very thoughts, the 109 fights you. It seems like the two German fighters are at polar ends of the spectrum. One flys and fights exceptionally well at low alt and speed, where the other only excelled above 400kph. The mustang seems it lives between the two extremes.

Hey thanks for the link!

Absolutely. At least in climb, acceleration and max speed. Turn is debatable but at lower speeds is bet the 109 would win as well. I don't understand why people are so shocked that the 109 is a dangerous adversary.

AI, a human pilot is far less god like but a good one who sticks to the vertical will still give you a run for your money.

Oh man I think this might be right up JG53's alley...

Really wish they would dump these straight of no-one-cares maps and do a real battlefield. North Afrika, Italy, Northern Europe etc.

Hey so any way to make these B-17's fly in formation?

Well if it's a matter of years then we will have to learn to make due I suppose. The portion of the Black Sea that we have populated could pass for the Adriatic coast of the Balkans I suppose. ETA: ya, I'm not impressed with BoS.

How in the hell did I miss this???!!! Awesome stuff! EDIT: Tried the B-17 and she works great! This is going to make our transition to DCS much much better! Thank you so much! With that said-Heres hoping for a B-26!

Honestly I hope they do not try to compete in the game market as you describe. BoS&M are garbage. 109's that feel like Fokker triplanes and yaks that levitate. It's just not fun. They could throw every aircraft ever flown in we2 into it and it would still be awful. DCS wins with its aircraft fidelity, that is what makes our virtual JG want it so badly. I'd be happy with this plane set, add the spit and thunderbolt and it's going to be wonderful, an AI b-17 would just put it over the moon, but without the map and targets it's going to be lacking regardless of the plane set.

In general I love this mod, however I have a pretty major Hangup that keeps me from using it. All is good until other aircraft get between 300 and 500 meters or so, where they completely vanish unless I zoom way in. Really kills it for my Messerschmitt flying. Perhaps I have done something incorrectly with this mod?

#3 and #5. Our JG is ready and waiting to bring our 30 pilots to DCS, but we need a proper sandbox in which to play. Give us a map and some targets and we will be here en mass