panzerd18

Seems like a bug. It also may occur when the IFF bug of the radar falls to work also.

From the cockpit it still looks good. But with external views and now with Combined Arms, being able to see much more detail due to being closer, the special effects are showing their age.

DCS 2.0 surely needs better effects, such as explosions, fires and general damage animations of damaged/crippled vehicles.

pls Mig-23

Yes, Mig-17, F-5, A-4, F-100, SkyRaider

F-5 was also in Vietnam so would fit into many different eras.

Would love a flyable module of the F-5E. Such a nice looking aircraft!

F-14 vs Mig-23 please.

Came here for answers, seems like the A/A sight is broken. Kind of ruins A/A dog fighting for me.

Would love to fly an Iraqi or Syrian Mig-23 up against F-16 or Mirage.

Would love the MIG-23, F-5

I had a X-52 Pro and went to an all CH HOTAS setup. I just love the CH Fighterstick it is amazing compared to the X-52 Pro. The range of motion is very big allowing you to delicately control your aircraft with precise movements. Although I have not tried the X-55, any CH products gets a big tick from me.

Is there any aileron and rudder trim in the mig?

A lack of visual damage on all DCS aircraft is a big drawback I have noticed coming from other flight games/simulators. In IL-2 1946 if you hit an aileron enough, the aileron would come off etc...

You can turn up the illumination in the sim.

Perfect landing!

I think its easier to release older fighters as their technology is not as well protected.

And F-5 Freedom Fighter and A-4 Skyhawk!!

Mig-23 and Mig-25 please!

Fw-190 had the mk103 gunpods

The problem is, the heavy jets are too complicated and multi-crew. I say give me a Su-31

I voted for the F-16. I mean who wouldn't want it!!!!

Yep, would love it.

Would love both the Mig-23 and Mig-25 to fly in DCS. Would love some cold war fighters to go up against each other.