Jump to content

zantron

Members
  • Posts

    125
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by zantron

  1. this is pretty much how i do it too, full flaps and +3 trim, though maybe 1 out of four or five times i find myself veering of the runway for some reason :/ even with tail wheel locked
  2. against any russian aircraft right now (i.e. cold war relics) and the goofy stealth fighter theyre making the f-35 will win, bvr at least lol. so what happens in 2030 or 2035 when it goes up against stealth drones? and thats only 15 years away. the one poster talked about the f-22 sneaking up on an iranian f-4 from behind, so why couldn't theoretical drone stealth fighters or new manned stealth fighters coming out of turkey or asia, whether china, korea, indonesia or japan do the same to the f-35? now its a infrared missile (or more likely some sort of infrared locking future laser pod) dogfight. the most likely scenario is, against a developed enemy, there be a few manned stealth fighters and a whole bunch of drone stealth fighters (unlike the f-16 will be able to pull like 40 gs) it will have to deal with. it just seems to me the f-35 will be either even or obsolete like battleships about 10-15 years into its (full) operation life.
  3. same here, i have zero desire for a sfm plane, never tried any of them that are sfm im for you guys getting f-117 but id rather get a multirole (cough Mitsubishi f-2 cough) or air superiority , i think we need to mix it up with these f-15s owning the day. but we have to wait i imagine for them to finish the mig29 and su33 before that
  4. military surplus fighter jets are actually pretty cheap (i used to go through this monthly planes for sale magazine at my airplane mechanic school and i couldn't believe how cheap i could buy a mig for), its the fuel and especially the maintenance that makes up for it lol
  5. firstly i never fanboy it out and kiss butt and defend companies esp when it comes to software. we all payed money and everyone has an absolute right to opinion, and id love an update too. that said though we're all very anxious to fly the C-101 as its meant to be flown (efm and bombs :pilotfly: ) and im dreaming about hog hunting with it on the 104th. BUT lets put things in perspective here, last update was month ago right? if it was march yeah but a month here. doesn't hawk and half of FC3 still have sfm? people are complaining its "part time" but lets be realistic here, is the non-steam c-101 going to feed kids and pay bills? (hopefully mirage f.1 will :D) im grateful theyre dedicated to make this happen despite having to work for a living and their personal lives. as much as i love aviation and simming/gaming, i wouldnt be able to do a project like this. theres also an unsubstantiated baseless rumor going around that ED is waiting for DCS 2 before next update - so feel free to put me in my place if im spreading lies lol
  6. id rather see the f-16 as a full fledged sim since theres bound to be enough info on it now as a compromise i think the jap F-2 would be an awesome FC3 addition :D DCS is in serious need of some east asian birds
  7. so i noticed blue had a mig-15 (at tbilisi-lochini) on able archer this evening and squee have to take it up for joy ride, however it spawns at whats looks like a helicopter launch area. no prob just gonna taxi but there was a literal tank (well, bmp) and two gents with aks blocking the taxiway! the noob is strong with me so is that normal? i mean dont really see how to get past without doing a little life fire test and see how mig15 cannons do against bmps lol
  8. id take either f-102 or the f-106 :D but f-106 has a gun, either way if it ever happens (i think razbam has made one for fsx) air-to-air nukes is a must
  9. yeah i was going to say, the real thing is a typical regular military plane under the skin.. making it wouldnt any more difficult than any other fighter for dcs, probably easier since it doesnt have a radar. while it would have a cool factor at first the more i think of it it probably get boring carrying two bombs and pretty much baby sitting the autopilot for the entire mission even though retired they still go up occasionally http://intercepts.defensenews.com/2014/11/we-now-know-why-the-f-117-is-still-flying/
  10. im a huge sinophile so any chinese bird would be awesome, i do really like the aesthetics of the f-7. since the info isn't there for full fidelity, i would still be super happy if they could make a FC3 version of the J-10 complete with PFM. apparently somebody has made a fsx sim for it, not up to FC3 standards but still cool http://www.pcaviator.com.au/store/product.php?productid=400600
  11. awesome advice thanks hadwell!! this im thinking seriously this might be my new nightly routine on dcs. !! su-27 kills with the sabres .50 are too cool lol. thanks guys for the advice i learn something new with the 21 every time i read about it. this indeed may be my new goal - to master that thing enough in hopes of getting my first 21 kill before fall
  12. i was thinking similar, only with starights i would assume red would also get su-25, mig-29 and mig-21 (to simulate the f-7). regardless whether nevada or persian gulf im looking forward to driving a red mig-28 or any type of mirage. really though with the typhoon (and f-15 and f-18 and no mountains to hide from them in, no idea how thats going to work for the reds over open ocean, not that im complaining i like fidelity and i like a challenge :D anways with an su-35, i really cant imagine anything like that happening as much as id love it. with the info available dcs would pretty much be making a fictional fighter that at best would approximate what an su-35 can do (or not do)
  13. yes! bwhaha behold the might of proletarian engineered mig-21 you f-15s! srsly hadwell please keep the videos coming not only do i enjoy but i learn a lot. hopefully one day ill be a competent enough 21 driver to try to attempt to fly it on multiplayer lol whaaa really?! how cool! what did you kill? i was looking at it earlier today and wondering how often people manage to pull that off lol
  14. oh just noticed after i posted that the decision has been made :D might be able to provide pm me
  15. id voted for C and would really like the european nato scenario. but personally i like alternate history/fictional scenarios in general (there was much glee on the day i got il2 1946). but perhaps option B would be better to simulate a nato invasion from turkey or black sea thats seized coastal assets? a plus with C (or a revised nato attack B scenario) is that the bf109 can be used with the czechs (and romanians) and nato of course was still flying p51s at the time
  16. this is really good idea
  17. sabreliner pleeaaasseeee first airplane i worked on and i have a soft spot for them
  18. we're going to be taking off from area 51, how could ED not make a black project plane considering all the work theyre putting into nevada? heres hoping at least
  19. they themselves mentioned they were considering it a year ago http://www.belsimtek.com/news/217/
  20. lol literally what happened to me my first Su-27 multiplayer mission, was only flying bf109 before.. so i just did half the training tutorials and jumped in raw on the 104th, took off about 10 km out boopboopboopboop OH GOD nose dive, flares chaff galore, miss a georgian village by 25ft... oh i think thats normal 10 min later hell yeah contact! perfect! what a noob im painting him like hell bastard doesnt see me, a sitting duck, first mission and first kill! prepare to fire!..... why dont i see my little arrows on my hud? ohhhhh i forgot to load out at the base.. uhhhhh i think he sees me BEEPBEEPBEEPBEEP oh shi-
  21. says "can't connect.", this is after about 20 seconds of trying to connect never used peer block, everything is default. maybe uninstall reinstall?
  22. i cant even see it on the list, ive been on dcs since march or april and have never seen it on my server list. but everyone talks about it and the youtube videos i watch all take place there and i want a to have fun there too :( i tried doing a direct connect using this IP i found 208.94.240.34:10308. on this thread http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=136020&page=3, my computer does a bit of thinking but says cant connect what a bummer
  23. sigh i wish, i love those late 40s stuff, both recips and jets. La-9 would be fun too for a korean war match up against the upcoming f8f bearcat - you might want to check that out http://forums.eagle.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=336
  24. i have to wonder too how much further it's "stealth" or rather stealthy characteristics will be compromised by its external payload, and how often it would be equipped with external weapons in combat situations... id imagine it would make sneaking up a little more difficult
  25. not sure what you mean, i was saying my opinion towards the people who you said would complain over low res :(
×
×
  • Create New...