plane00

I agree partly ,but promotion is another fun.

Please, search the forum.......

Mine is major as a russian pilot.

At this time and for me, It is really neccessary. I have no track IR. So I needs it ultimately in all close air combat.

I'm a member of party of simulation rather than just shooter game I favor 100% same as real

I absolutley do not agree to first opinion of this thread Of course, I also think much of efficinecy of GPU for reducing loading on GPU. but as a flight simulation gamer, Graphic is not the first. Of course, graphic effects which have influences on game play, for example, identifying splash1,2,3 at far distance, or idetifying ground targets at appropriate diatance most same with in real real world, is important. (and more: altittude, velocity awareness by water, ground texture..............................) But even now, I expensed money much on hardware than software just for playing almost only LOFC. (In addition, I regard flight simulation as improtant than other games) I don't want expense more money on hardware. The better, BS's graphic advace more, considering aspects of graphic level of recent games, so I suggest BS give us broad width of choice in graphic detail, effects. If only Possible!! just my hope at this time.

Vapor formation at high AOA above strake of mig-29, su-27, su-33 disappeared from LOMAC. Why???

I agree. I want logbook data updating with no relation with dead or live In Falcon's updating system, accumulating my score is quite interesting. Espacially by match playing whenever I have some rest time...

Lift line in canopy & moving smoothly toward center view for no-trackir users same as above, trivia wish

Any plan to relieve CPU's burden by using Physics on GPU? Isn't there any new CPU helper like graphic card? I saw news about 'physics on GPU' 'In the games of 2003 and beyond, physics have taken an increasing toll on the CPU. ' Physics of gravity on Ammos, human unit, a burden from transport plane, particles from damaged plane and collision of solid objects will be helped by 'Physics accelerator', won't it? So.. more wainting, outcome better (But, I don't know technical problem)

I liked su-27 Su-27' design is masterpiece, so at first look I'm impressed long time ago. From ED's 'su-27' I 've been curious about flight simulation again. Because no other developers ever made russian main flyable figheter. Obviously it attracts many. From that point of view, A-10 ,Apach is welcome, and I also hope revival of russian machine mainly focused would be considered regardless of any kinds. Don't forget old mania of su-27, please.

Where's my helicopter? Can't I control Heli even downgraded version? and infantry units and more detailed map as mentioned previously, advanced groud AI unit things planned at first, please....

As a su-27 user... (I didn't read all of previous articles, read only some forward part and because I'm not American, I am not as good at English as they are, But I could recognize main subject a little.) I want respect ED's decision about realism level. I also have some complaints (ex.lethality of R-77, R-73) personally. if all users claims his own wishes mindlessly, I think developers will not able to react one by one....... F-15 is sufficiently lethal in LOFC.......

About accumulation of stress of structure,engine I want concept of 'real time virtual world' only to be part of campaign. I need as training simulator of air commbat personally,so I want LO maintain fast mission maker.( BUt I wonder who on the earth want fly his aircraft as degraded? I would rather repair my aircraft right there)

About new AI of units As mentioned by Wags New AI of units will be fine. I expect strategy which commands units would exist.

My answer to the Point of the question in this thread 1st trackIR 6DOF ..and there aren't additional wishes else. I just wanna realease missile and pull G and search visually, drop flares, relock, release missiles again and again and splash 1,2,3 at best!!!

I had some bad day.... I haven't played lockon FC for ages, then I had a chance to play it two days ago. My score was terrible.. I lost almost of all times in air match.... Then I realized one important thing. What is more important is how much we effort to master lock on FC. Almost of us have wish lists in mind, but even in current FC 1.12b version, I am not good at it. Lock on FC asks for continous pratice to master it. 'Master' may be not appropriate. I need practice,practice and practice... (I haven't tried even air refueling till now) No impact on air combat in BS will be fine according to that point of view. Thank you for reading!!

image of ka-50 with two turrets here which was quoted in advance by Alfa_Kilo

Once upon a time I suggested FC should be continued together with BS, but it was just my own opinion among many ways to select. such a way can restrict potency to be top of flight simulation genre that ED aims at. I want not FC to preserve it's value but lock on series to be advaced more.