Cytt0rak

Can we get AIM-54 too and while we are at it can we get those laser pods from AC7? Thanks.

Well I'm sure one day they will start doing other blocks or variants of same airframe. What are they going to do after all recent airframes come out to DCS? They will have to make those old or newer models in future.

Wags will we see Litening on F-16 like how we will get it earlier for F/A-18C? Though I'm not informed if this spesific block ever carried one.

Are you alive? :lol:

Okay I wasn't expecting this. They already started it. This shows why they were saying this year.

Its been broken for a year you are not doing anything wrong.

Yes. Right now they are using F/A-18E though.

Thanks BoNidle I was using another font that looks similar and using same technique as yours to get them as close as possible to reference pictures. I also would like to know those fonts If someone finds them.

Hello BoNidle nice skin. I'm trying to make one of the line versions. Which font are you using on numbers and words?

Bump with quote

Bump

https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3780711&postcount=72 Stated to come out this weekend. Probably tonight in UK timezone.

Impossible. Not going to stop until =DECOY= bans me. :megalol: Looking forward to both timeline and monthly video I'm expecting more info about Harrier issue there.

There was a missing features post in somewhere in its respective subforum. But realism side it will get as realistic as possible depending on the real owner of plane aka AdA. These are active service planes and the products we have are mostly limited in some ways. Like AoA of F/A-18, A-10's thrust-power or speed ( don't really know the real issue there is a big forum topic about this )

https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3680891&postcount=58 https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3617904&postcount=95 and considering CptSmiley is their only FM guy. I'm not interpreting anything and talking about only known RAZBAM associates and considering Zeus was the main Harrier/Mirage code dev, It seems there has been some change in the background. They might still have another coder in the back but then why did Zeus did all those work? Not to mention they posted this back in the day promising no impact on projects. https://www.facebook.com/RazbamSims/posts/1188489004571069

Wrong Cuban is not related to that team at all and RAZBAM have never stated Mig had their own coders RAZBAM coders aka Zeus and CptSmiley worked on it. Until recently where they hired a new coder for Harrier. Team difference were only at arts side as OverStratos worked on it.

Title. Right now manual waypoint additions are not precise enough because of coordinates type.

Decoy sorry if this is stated in somewhere else what happened to monthly update videos?

AV-8B N/A :megalol:

Yeah Swiss army knife multitool dlc please!

So you went from this to this Tell me why engineers made AN/AAQ-28(V) in a way that it can follow moving contrasts. According to you there is definite no need for it. Tell me why AV-8B N/A has CCIP to AUTO if its irrelevant. Just because you can bomb stuff without need of submodes doesn't make it realistic. What do you mean by adapt and overcome? Armed forces see a need and they request it from the engineers. This is military equipment they are designed according to what armed forces want. You are clearly not using the equipment in a realistic way, contradicting with yourself and trying to deny others with fallacy. I believe you can write better answers without going for ad hominem.

Yes you can't use it how a real life Harrier pilot uses it. This is enough to make it not realistic. Yes you might like to play it casually but don't try to enforce your casual ideas to other hardcore guys.

https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/equip/bru-57.htm I think latter picture is from Greek AF.

You are right. I've been trying to find info about them as they are only way to double load JSOW's and smart cluster munitions.

Yeah but you can find a VX- photo from 2001-2002's of BLU-55 testing in F/A-18. Info is really scarce in this.