Udat

Just wich improvements are you referring to, white? it's been stated repeatedly that only IFF and missile/fligh performance have been fixed. This goes for the russian planes as well (except they have had IFF all along..)

Aaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahaaha

Crunch, ever the calm, unbiased voice in the theese threads <3 I agree with you, realism is more important than balance. I think that avionics, aerodynamic perfomance of both missiles and planes, as well as radar/ecm/rwr effectiveness should be as real as ED can possibly make them with the resources they have. I would, however, love the opportunity to fly a flanker version capable of carrying R-77s for instance, despite the fact the current russian operational version(s) could'nt do so at the time the sim was developed, even if it ws intended to do so in the future. Trough giving the arguably technologically inferior side this smallest of conscessions (in my mind,) we could get a much more dynamically varied and, well, balanced tactical environment to fly in. I wouldn't mind if we'd need 2-3 RuFor fighters to bring down an eagle, if that was the "price" of performance realism. At the same time I wouldn't mind facing a Fox 3-loaded flanker in my eagle, if that would be the "price" of overlooking the fact that the missiles, avionics and aircraft that's been in LO from the start, weren't initially all in the same plane.. I know this is a slippery slope indeed, but it might be food for thought.. I play lockon for fun, and I think having flankers with AR missiles in the game would be fun :smilewink:

When light on fuel you can reach well over 100,000 feet in the f-15. Even higher with the mig. Just don't rush it.

Brilliant; maybe we could get the links for all the mods and include the last version of Modman and LOCFG in the OP? Edit: sorry, I¨'m halfway into my second beer and allready I'm not looking properly trough stuff before replying.. Great thread :)

Vulching with a fully loaded A-10 might just be the most fulfilling thing you can possibly DO in multiplayer.. 6 AGM-65K's, 6+ rockeyes, some rockets and that big Avenger can seriously ruin the day of a bustling enemy airbase :) Just don't expect getting there to be a walk in the park, even with fighter escort and SEAD-equipped T-frogs on your wing.

Wow, I seriously missed my mark there I guess :doh: Dunno why I was convinced he's sweedish..

Hey hey; I'm from Norway. Never knew we were quite so many.. I think 51st Case is sweedish, so there's another one. It might be cool to fly a bit together when FC 2.0 comes out..

:worthy:

Keep up the incredible work, guys! And someone with the skills and time for it join them and get something for the RU birds pleeeease.. Edit: ED, why don't you hire theese guys :P

It would be really cool if FC 2.0 owners that bought future DCS modules would get FC updated to the level of the last module they paid for. This is offcourse just wishful thinking from a guy that don't know the first thing about programming (or legal stuff,) but I think it'd be win-win (it would make us buy new modules for sure, and keep us happy with FC constantly up to date) if at all possible.

Damn that was fast Kuky! I forgot to thank you for the fix, by the way.. So thanks mate, really appreciate the help :)

extract everything in the procaff.zip directly into the windows folder, or just procaff.exe? And should my bat file look like this? @echo off rem regsvr32 /s msxml.dll regsvr32 /s MOM.dll change.com C:\Ubisoft\Eagle Dynamics\Lock On\Config\graphics.cfg "aspect = 1.333333373" "aspect = 1.6" Del /f/q Config\TrackIR Del /f/q Input\TrackIR.ini start C:\WINDOWS\Procaff.exe /run 2 "C:\Ubisoft\Eagle Dynamics\Lock On\LockOn.exe" exit

Congrats to all top pilots; X-man, breakshot, but most of all my wingman Sana..Kan! I'd loe to see the tracks!

Another question; will FC 2.0 be affected by Black Shark patches, given that they'll share units, terrain and graphics, and be multiplayer compatible? Once again, thank you from the bottom of my heart, I was close to tears when I discovered this thread yesterday.. Edit: Oh, it would also be insanely cool if you could put together a complete "Eagle Dynamics Pack" that includes the original FC (patched to 1.12,) FC 2.0 and Black Shark, maybe in a good-looking package with hardcopy manuals included (aaand maybe even a A2-ish format of the entire map area (to have on the wall above my screen) with all airfields maked out.. I sure know I'd dish out pretty much whatever you asked for it!

Thank you so much, ED! This is better news than anyone dared dream of..

Those skins are just jaw-dropping amazing! Especially the mig-29 and the first F-16. Wow!

I'm honored! Great work, brother!

Well then I guess I was misinformed about the 120; I heard it was made much less effective after version 1.02 I think it was, presumably to balance multiplay. I don't really know, though, so I stand corrected, my bad. What I do know is that one of the F-15c training tracks isn't working properly after FC release because the AIM 120 miss it's target. As for the EA, you make a valid point; it's a slippery slope indeed. But to me there is a big difference between taking something OUT of the game that was ready for production at the time it first came out, and adding planned weapon systems that is ready for production a decade later.. I kind of half-way agree with you though, it really is a slippery slope.

Yes, to a degree. As an example I think they shouldn't have excluded the R-27EA just because the russian airfirce don't use them.. The missile exist, and is compatible with the flanker in the game (correct me if I'm wrong here btw..) If they'd kept it, maybe they wouldn't have "had to" ruin the AIM-120 to balance out things.

Or just add ctrl to everytime E is pressed.. :D

I have no idea, allthough I'm guessing it will mostly be bugfixing and such. I just think it would be a shame if the worst came to happen; that you released one of the best mods in simming history and then a month later it becomes unusable..

Ricardo you should get in touch with ED (or vice versa) to ensure that the 1.13 patch doesn't render this mod uncompatible..

I completely agree with Crunch (and the 51st guys and GG,) all the unfounded accusations of cheating is a much bigger problem than cheating itself.

Maybe you can paint the 9 or the 1 on the actual skin, so that it'll alway be there.. Might offset the numbers too much to the left or right though.