GrmlZ

I dont think it would be necessary to split them. If you see it as a "vietnam era" server but with F-86 Sabres and Mig-15s too. (and maybe UH-1s and MI-8s also? ) As i said, at the very least they could take ground attack roles, like A-4s and the like did in Vietnam. And, in the right situation they can take on F-5s/mig-21s as well.

Hi Would it be possible to just add the Mig-15 and F-86 (with Gar-8 ) to the Mig-21/F-5 server mission? While they arnt really "vietnam" planes, neither is the Mig-21 Bis and would add some variety and you dont have to rotate. At the very least they can be used for ground attack, P-51 in a Korea Server.

Funny, i was just thinking about those two fictional factions and this pops up. :D I think fictional factions may play a bigger role in MP in the future, with lots of European and US aircraft modules on the roadmap, but sadly few or no new Russian planes. Having two big fictional countries with planes manufactured in many differnt countries (like the indian air force in RL for example) would help make MP scenarios with a lineup that provides both sides a similar number of aircraft to choose from while avoiding mirror matchups that requier IFF, which some planes dont have. Also Northeria and Southeria skins look cool.

I tested the P and P-5 on both the F-5E and F-15C. The Aim-9P and P-5 have problems, they have a much shorter range than the Atoll (all of them) and lose speed MUCH faster than an Atoll. Why would a Aim-9P/P-5 after rocket burnout in the same situation and speed lose speed and energy this much faster? You can easily test this in the editor both on the F-15C and F-5E.

Did a few tests with the P/P-5, all the IR Atoll variants on you can hang on the Mig-21 and r-60/r-60m. The P/P-5 perform worse than all Atolls and the R 60 and have a significantly shorter range than the Atolls and R60s. The P and P-5 lose speed way faster after engine burnout than the Atolls to such a degree that they have trouble even catching up to a Mig-21 flying at a decent speed (700 kph for most tests). (while the atolls still can without problem) So, i would say there are a few Fm issues with the missile, but its not just on the F-5 of course, but made worse by the low missile count and more difficult lockon. ATM i would say the P and P-5s performance is about comparable to the GAR-8. Everything else is much better.

Making it rain.

And so it begins. :D

Thx Q: Can a player that does not own the Gazelle take the gunner position? I know this has been asked bevore. But maybe there is some new info about the topic by now. :) I think the ability for people to use the second seat without owing the module would not just be a great feature for the players but also a financially a sound decision. (for all modules with multi seat aircraft) As it both increases the desirability of the module as well as give the community a great tool to get new players into DCS and grow the player base as a whole. So, if that would be technically possible.... :)

That looks really impressive.

May i have some more? :P

Only one? :( But i got so many.

[ame] [/ame]

Fun with Bridges. Some Precision Training. :)

Since it looks there isnt a dedicated Gazelle video thread yet, i make my own. Feel free to post your videos. :) My first Gazelle Video. First look at the Heli and mission to liberate Cactus springs. [ame] [/ame]

A few from me.

Great Work. I love it. Screenshots. http://imgur.com/a/8thE2

Maybe someday, but its not ready for a public release yet. It needs a lot of polish for that and i am still somewhat new to the editor, so i am still learning as i do those.

Taking a look at the Mi-8. :) [ame] [/ame]

Got the Uh-1 Module a few days ago. Video with it. [ame] [/ame]