

sylkhan
Members-
Posts
668 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by sylkhan
-
ah ok, i see, thx @AeriaGloria
-
SPO is designed to not react to friendly radar (SAMs, Fighters...), but in DCS all friendly radar are a threat ? I know that SPO can sometime do mistake (friendly as a threat) but it's all the time. In fact for me this SPO has no utility, or i am missing something. If at least it can do the difference between enemy or friend radar emission, i think it's a minimum. It's for the 2 modes (automatic & stock WP)
-
any news from ED? It's 1 year old bug ...
-
Sure, you should do the same with F-16, F-18 and so on, with metric sytem, because imperial system is so .... well, obsolete, outdated, it would be more confortable for me, but for now i try to avoid all planes with imperial system.
-
I already asked for this 1 year ago : but no news.
-
We can hope for KA-50 IV......
-
Yes, it's better, but always too much instability on the yaw axis. Lol, why these changes about FMs then, docs and proofs have change since last year ? Docs and proofs don't do a FM, it's just a basis, but FMs are so much more than that, and yes, the feeling is part of how good a FM is, or not.
-
It wasn't by "choice", but imposed by ED. This is not a viable situation for DEKA and its customers. We were used to fast, and great support, and this will have a negative impact on DEKA and its modules. ED have already a lot of work with theirs modules. @uboats should be able to at least, work on the weapons bugs, and this does not prevent ED from making weapon's changes, if they wish.
-
Whatever the release altitude (2000, 3000, 5000, ..) and dive angle, the cansiter opens at 1.2s and CCIP/CCRP are way off. jf17 mk-20 bug.trk
-
Thanks for confirming the bug. It seems that the canister opening time must vary according to release altitude and dive angle. someone has made an interesting table, take a look https://flyandwire.com/2022/08/05/the-mk-20-rockeye-cluster-bomb-observations/ I will made a bug report to ED but they don't seem to be very reactive to treat the bugs, then i am afraid that we will have to wait a long time.
-
and since then, nothing has been done by ED ?
-
Here is the track jf17 mk-20 bug.trk
-
I don't miss anything, i was asking about release parameter (if any, never use this bomb). But it's seems to be a bug. Whatever the release altitude (2000, 3000, 5000, ..) the cansiter opens immediately and bomblets are released. In my post, I specified, "they don't seem to work properly. " so the minimum a person should do before replying would be to check if the mk-20s work properly and the method used (CCRP, CCIP, Dive angle,speed, and so on). Then perhaps someone can confirm it's a bug or there is a special procedure to use them ?
-
Can someone explain how to use the mk-20s, they don't seem to work properly. Thanks
-
Expectation on Air to Air missiles of the MiG-29A?
sylkhan replied to pepin1234's topic in DCS: MiG-29A Fulcrum
@Chizh do you think, it's necessarry to add propaganda to propaganda ? Do you think that people are stupid enough to trust these type of articles...ok.. yes... a lot :), but not all. This one make me laugh "It's widely believed that superior pilot training was the main reason why American F-86 Sabres consistently gained air superiority over technically superior Russian MiG-15s in the Korean War." -
Yes, if your speed is > mach 0.8, it's near 100%
-
Expectation on Air to Air missiles of the MiG-29A?
sylkhan replied to pepin1234's topic in DCS: MiG-29A Fulcrum
^ This. DCS is just an hollywood Game, then don't expect realism. Actually, the mig29 flies like a sausage, no stability on the yaw axis, do some slight rudders inputs and see what happens, even a simple roll input causes an over-reaction of the yaw axis. And the drag coefficient, lol, with an AOA angle>12° the MIG is a lot more draggy than a delta wing jet like the Mirage 2000, just hilarious FM. In DCS the MIG-29 is not a competitor in Dogfight, funny isn't it. -
@Karon your (translation) manual is very well done, very useful, many thanks.
-
jf17 ls6100 bug.trk
-
-
Chinese manual ..., ok thanks @tekwoj, i will translate the relevant part, but @Napillo seems to be refering to another manual ?, since he give me the advice to read it once, otherwise his remark would be just .... well ....plain stupid.
-
Manual ? What manual ? I have a quick guide (from DEKA) and and the thunder guide from (Chuck) In the thunder guide i can read : "2. If RWS or VS mode is selected: a) Slew the TDC (Target Designator Controller) over a desired target and press the TDC (ENTER) to transfer from RWS to SAM mode. This is NOT a radar lock; you have merely set a target as the HPT (High Priority Target), which is represented as a circle. Other SPTs (Secondary Priority Targets) will be displayed as well without a circle. b) Press the TDC (ENTER) a second time to radar lock the desired target to STT (Single Target Track) mode. c) You can unlock target by using the S2 Sensor Control Switch DEPRESS" That means : for RWS or VS mode selected : first DTC press-->SAM mode, second DTC press-->STT mode
-
Locking a target in VS mode go directly to STT (not SAM), Bug ? jf-17 vs stt.trk
-
@Dr_Pavelheer good point.