sylkhan

Lol, so true, and friendly radar jets lock, who is who ?

На сервере Dogfight все зависит от комнаты, в которой вы находитесь. В некоторых комнатах играют «многие против многих», и вы можете набрать много очков за сбитые самолеты, но я говорю о режиме «1 на 1», и могу вас заверить, что даже хороший пилот DCS mig-29 будет с трудом побеждать других истребителей. ----- In dogfight server, it depends on the room you are in. Some rooms are "many vs many", and you can have a lot of kill, But i am talking "1 VS 1", and i can assure you that a good DCS mig-29 pilot, will have a hard time to beat other fighters.

Я провел много тестов против людей (Online Dogfight server) F-18>Mig-29 F-16>Mig-29 F-15>Mig-29 Big F-14>Mig-29 Lol Mirage2000>Mig-29 (FC3) Su-27>Mig-29 Mig-29 — худший боец в «Dogfight».:( It's because the DCS Mig-29 has a very poor "sustained turn rate" "translate with Deepl"

@Lixma 06 Clean, Alt 1000m, 13000 kg, It's 7.0/7.1G not 7.5G да

Same result as my tests

@AeriaGloria test done 100m, they are identical. sustained turn rate. Clean, Alt 100m, 13000 kg mach 0.55, 378 knots, 700 kmh, 6.5G SHOULD BE 7G (your chart "sustained G turn capability, max AB") mach 0.6, 400 knots, 740 kmh, 7G SHOULD BE 7.5G (your chart "sustained G turn capability, max AB") mach 0.63, 420 knots, 780 Kmh, 7.2G SHOULD BE 8G (your chart "sustained G turn capability, max AB") mach 0.68, 453 knots, 840 kmh, 7.9G SHOULD BE 9G (your chart "sustained G turn capability, max AB") .

0.5G to 1G, that's big. Ah, 0 was too low :), then i took 500m to do my tests without crashing on the ground, it was arbitrary.

@AeriaGloria I have done some tests on sustained turn rate. Clean, Alt 500m, 13000 kg mach 0.55, 378 knots, 700 kmh, 6.5G SHOULD BE 7G (your chart "sustained G turn capability, max AB") mach 0.6, 400 knots, 740 kmh, 7G SHOULD BE 7.5G (your chart "sustained G turn capability, max AB") mach 0.63, 420 knots, 780 Kmh, 7.2G SHOULD BE 8G (your chart "sustained G turn capability, max AB") mach 0.68, 453 knots, 840 kmh, 8G SHOULD BE 9G (your chart "sustained G turn capability, max AB") There is a big difference ! Can you confirm. Thx

This confirms my tests. I have done numerous online tests (dogfighters servers), and it turns out that the Mig-29 is the worst dogfighter. At speeds < 800/850 km, the Mig-29 turns really badly, and performance is poor, with a lot of drag. The F-18, F-16, F-15, and M2k, JF-17 all outperform the Mig-29, even the F-14 turns better at low/medium speeds, lol. I win all the time vs Mig-29, i Lost all the time vs other fighters. Is the real Mig-29 really that bad?

Static objects do not appear on the DTC Map, so we can't set a building as target point.

Have you tried BetAB-500ShP because i can't hit anything.

Doesn't seems to work that way, i did some test with su-27 and spo-15 behave the same way, friend or foe.

ah ok, i see, thx @AeriaGloria

SPO is designed to not react to friendly radar (SAMs, Fighters...), but in DCS all friendly radar are a threat ? I know that SPO can sometime do mistake (friendly as a threat) but it's all the time. In fact for me this SPO has no utility, or i am missing something. If at least it can do the difference between enemy or friend radar emission, i think it's a minimum. It's for the 2 modes (automatic & stock WP)

^ This.

any news from ED? It's 1 year old bug ...

Sure, you should do the same with F-16, F-18 and so on, with metric sytem, because imperial system is so .... well, obsolete, outdated, it would be more confortable for me, but for now i try to avoid all planes with imperial system.

I already asked for this 1 year ago : but no news.

We can hope for KA-50 IV......

Yes, it's better, but always too much instability on the yaw axis. Lol, why these changes about FMs then, docs and proofs have change since last year ? Docs and proofs don't do a FM, it's just a basis, but FMs are so much more than that, and yes, the feeling is part of how good a FM is, or not.

It wasn't by "choice", but imposed by ED. This is not a viable situation for DEKA and its customers. We were used to fast, and great support, and this will have a negative impact on DEKA and its modules. ED have already a lot of work with theirs modules. @uboats should be able to at least, work on the weapons bugs, and this does not prevent ED from making weapon's changes, if they wish.

Whatever the release altitude (2000, 3000, 5000, ..) and dive angle, the cansiter opens at 1.2s and CCIP/CCRP are way off. jf17 mk-20 bug.trk

Thanks for confirming the bug. It seems that the canister opening time must vary according to release altitude and dive angle. someone has made an interesting table, take a look https://flyandwire.com/2022/08/05/the-mk-20-rockeye-cluster-bomb-observations/ I will made a bug report to ED but they don't seem to be very reactive to treat the bugs, then i am afraid that we will have to wait a long time.

and since then, nothing has been done by ED ?

Here is the track jf17 mk-20 bug.trk