 
         
					
                
                
            sylkhan
Members- 
                Posts677
- 
                Joined
- 
                Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by sylkhan
- 
	@Lixma 06 Clean, Alt 1000m, 13000 kg, It's 7.0/7.1G not 7.5G да
- 
	Same result as my tests
- 
	@AeriaGloria test done 100m, they are identical. sustained turn rate. Clean, Alt 100m, 13000 kg mach 0.55, 378 knots, 700 kmh, 6.5G SHOULD BE 7G (your chart "sustained G turn capability, max AB") mach 0.6, 400 knots, 740 kmh, 7G SHOULD BE 7.5G (your chart "sustained G turn capability, max AB") mach 0.63, 420 knots, 780 Kmh, 7.2G SHOULD BE 8G (your chart "sustained G turn capability, max AB") mach 0.68, 453 knots, 840 kmh, 7.9G SHOULD BE 9G (your chart "sustained G turn capability, max AB") .
- 
	0.5G to 1G, that's big. Ah, 0 was too low :), then i took 500m to do my tests without crashing on the ground, it was arbitrary.
- 
	@AeriaGloria I have done some tests on sustained turn rate. Clean, Alt 500m, 13000 kg mach 0.55, 378 knots, 700 kmh, 6.5G SHOULD BE 7G (your chart "sustained G turn capability, max AB") mach 0.6, 400 knots, 740 kmh, 7G SHOULD BE 7.5G (your chart "sustained G turn capability, max AB") mach 0.63, 420 knots, 780 Kmh, 7.2G SHOULD BE 8G (your chart "sustained G turn capability, max AB") mach 0.68, 453 knots, 840 kmh, 8G SHOULD BE 9G (your chart "sustained G turn capability, max AB") There is a big difference ! Can you confirm. Thx
- 
	This confirms my tests. I have done numerous online tests (dogfighters servers), and it turns out that the Mig-29 is the worst dogfighter. At speeds < 800/850 km, the Mig-29 turns really badly, and performance is poor, with a lot of drag. The F-18, F-16, F-15, and M2k, JF-17 all outperform the Mig-29, even the F-14 turns better at low/medium speeds, lol. I win all the time vs Mig-29, i Lost all the time vs other fighters. Is the real Mig-29 really that bad?
- 
	Static objects do not appear on the DTC Map, so we can't set a building as target point.
- 
	Have you tried BetAB-500ShP because i can't hit anything.
- 
	Doesn't seems to work that way, i did some test with su-27 and spo-15 behave the same way, friend or foe.
- 
	ah ok, i see, thx @AeriaGloria
- 
	SPO is designed to not react to friendly radar (SAMs, Fighters...), but in DCS all friendly radar are a threat ? I know that SPO can sometime do mistake (friendly as a threat) but it's all the time. In fact for me this SPO has no utility, or i am missing something. If at least it can do the difference between enemy or friend radar emission, i think it's a minimum. It's for the 2 modes (automatic & stock WP)
- 
	any news from ED? It's 1 year old bug ...
- 
	Sure, you should do the same with F-16, F-18 and so on, with metric sytem, because imperial system is so .... well, obsolete, outdated, it would be more confortable for me, but for now i try to avoid all planes with imperial system.
- 
	I already asked for this 1 year ago : but no news.
- 
	We can hope for KA-50 IV......
- 
	Yes, it's better, but always too much instability on the yaw axis. Lol, why these changes about FMs then, docs and proofs have change since last year ? Docs and proofs don't do a FM, it's just a basis, but FMs are so much more than that, and yes, the feeling is part of how good a FM is, or not.
- 
	It wasn't by "choice", but imposed by ED. This is not a viable situation for DEKA and its customers. We were used to fast, and great support, and this will have a negative impact on DEKA and its modules. ED have already a lot of work with theirs modules. @uboats should be able to at least, work on the weapons bugs, and this does not prevent ED from making weapon's changes, if they wish.
- 
	Whatever the release altitude (2000, 3000, 5000, ..) and dive angle, the cansiter opens at 1.2s and CCIP/CCRP are way off. jf17 mk-20 bug.trk
- 
	Thanks for confirming the bug. It seems that the canister opening time must vary according to release altitude and dive angle. someone has made an interesting table, take a look https://flyandwire.com/2022/08/05/the-mk-20-rockeye-cluster-bomb-observations/ I will made a bug report to ED but they don't seem to be very reactive to treat the bugs, then i am afraid that we will have to wait a long time.
- 
	and since then, nothing has been done by ED ?
- 
	Here is the track jf17 mk-20 bug.trk
- 
	I don't miss anything, i was asking about release parameter (if any, never use this bomb). But it's seems to be a bug. Whatever the release altitude (2000, 3000, 5000, ..) the cansiter opens immediately and bomblets are released. In my post, I specified, "they don't seem to work properly. " so the minimum a person should do before replying would be to check if the mk-20s work properly and the method used (CCRP, CCIP, Dive angle,speed, and so on). Then perhaps someone can confirm it's a bug or there is a special procedure to use them ?
- 
	Can someone explain how to use the mk-20s, they don't seem to work properly. Thanks
- 
	  Expectation on Air to Air missiles of the MiG-29A?sylkhan replied to pepin1234's topic in DCS: MiG-29A Fulcrum @Chizh do you think, it's necessarry to add propaganda to propaganda ? Do you think that people are stupid enough to trust these type of articles...ok.. yes... a lot :), but not all. This one make me laugh "It's widely believed that superior pilot training was the main reason why American F-86 Sabres consistently gained air superiority over technically superior Russian MiG-15s in the Korean War."

 
					
						