sylkhan

Unfortunately No, Fm & trimming in the Hind bugged or bad design, but some seems to be happy with that. They have always good reason to explain why things are like they are :)., even if there is no logic. Trimming means stabilization. For the Hind trimming means jumping, diving, rolling left or right, just a joke. It's impossible that the Real Hind has this trim mechanic. Trimming the Mi8 is perfect and it seems that it's not the same team who devellop the FMs/trim for the hind & the Mi8 I don't fly the Hind anymore, waiting for correction (eventually).

Mmmh,not really, 2.5 would be more accurate

I confirm

I confirm If it's true, that's really sad., but not surprising from ED

Interesting,but if it's the correct behavior in RL, it makes the pilot life a little harder Will try that, thx Aeriagloria

Unplayable, who said unplayable ? There are some conflict with AP (pich, roll), after trimming the mi-24, go up or go down or go up and roll etc, depending of your initial position. Trimming doesn't give a neutral, stable position (like Mi-8 for example). Even if the trimming systems of mi-8 and mi-24 are differents, it should give the Mi-24 the same stability.

Pitch occiliation and Poor trimming implementation are irratating. It's sad because Mi24 module could be really great

Great, many thanks @SL PAK

@SL PAK Can you please take a look at this old and very frustrating ccrp bug. Thanks.

After EA, can we expect a rework of the internal cockpit engine sound to match up the current standard ?

hello, i am interested too.

unfortunately we have to deal with this crappy, obsolete, and stupid imperial system.

5 years and this important bug is always present. That's not serious, really.

Totally agree

I can confirm, laser stop working after firing some BRM-1.

A video is better than thousand of words/graphs/test or whatever you want, and confirm what i am saying since a long time "Mig-29 FM is way off reality" Some viewer's comments : "Amazing video again. Quite surprised the Mig-29 isn't a lot better. Always thought the 29 would be a lot better then the Tomcat in a dogfight." "For some reason I would've assumed that in a turn-and-burn within-visual-range dogfight the MiG-29 would be more nimble and dominate the F-14 with its higher thrust-to-weight ratio..." "I didn't expect that F-14 could beat Mig-29 ! " "Why is the F14 so dominant in the rate fight ?" "Currently in DCS the 29 feels kinda underpowered...Also it gets pretty wobbly when slow ... " " mig-29" "Dogfight mig29 and f14, mig lose, really?!? ;

delete : bad topic

+1 Viper seems correct, but hornet and tomcat are really too OP. Mirage or other jets can't compete in PvP dogfights vs Hornet and tomcat. That's not realistic at all. it's not even fun to do PvP dogfights vs Hornet.

Same here no pb with LS-6 and GB-6, ld-10, sd-10 are ok too

I never said that we need a 2000-5/9 :), i just said that, IF RAZBAM can do a 2000-5 in the futur, then a 2000-9 would be a better option (IMO). For the rest i agree with all you have said

Never too late to do things right Will the engine sounds inside the cockpit be reworked? Thanks

Are you ok ? I have said absolutely nothing But from what stuff are you talking about ? Are you sure you are refering to my post. falcon_120 said "Hopefully we'll get a m 2000-5 at some points as a new module, it would be awesome as it is the current M2000C " and i said " Mirage 2000-9 would be (IMO) a better option. (because of the multi role capacities)" Nothing more... nothing less. We were talking about a possible future module. Is it more clear for you ?

Mirage 2000-9 would be (IMO) a better option. https://www.dassault-aviation.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2012/08/Mirage_2000-9_special_issue1.pdf - Nav/attack system: Modular avionics, new RDY-2 multimode radar, digitally terrain following system, new IMEWS countermeasures, Thomrad radio with frequency evasion and enhanced encoding, glass cockpit with new LCD visualisation plus night vision goggles com- patibility, data-link, gyro-laser inertial navi-gation system, navigation Forward Looking Infra-Red system (NAHAR). In-flight refuelling and autothrottle (automatic speed control). - Air-air strike: Mica IR and EM. - Air-ground strike: Conventional bombs, video and laser-guided bombs, Black Shaheen cruise missile, recce pod and SHEHAB laser designation pod.

Nothing, except it's a big heavy ugly plane In DCS world, ...yes, in real world, no way. i know very well your rhetorical arguments. it reminds me of an article I read recently. https://www.portail-aviation.com/blog/2012/07/03/typhoon-vs-rafale-en-dogfight-le-f22/ I translate a little part because it's in french. "We learn that there have been at least six mock fights, and of the six, the Raptor has only been credited with one win, and five draws. The American embarrassment was such at a score well below that expected, that they even claimed that the Raptor was crippled by external tanks, which an OSF capture of the Rafale belies. Bad players the Anglo-Saxons? We are now used to it" Then like you said, perhaps F-14 had stores, or perhaps they were flying with the left hand, who knows :), or perhaps the F-14 is a very bad dogfihter, like our pilots have said. I tend to trust our french pilots, a lot more

триммер лучше, но до конца не отремонтирован. @PilotMi8когда можно ожидать полной коррекции триммера? Спасибо google translation