Axel40

Yea, thanks for that. I figured as much but much better to hear it from the horses mouth as they say :) Might wait for further BETA's..

Guys, how does it run when compared to Black Shark? Example, I can run BS with all bells and whistles and get a low of 30 fps and a high of 100+ when looking at sky and so on. This is at 1600x1050 and all settings on the high side. So, compared to BS, how does this run please? Are the fps comparable, broadly speaking of course? (and a rough estimate will be fine)

If you're in American Aircraft you have to bind a separate key/button to fire missiles. Your cannon button will not fire your Mav's, Sidewinder's etc.

Hi Fusion, Vis range is set to High in the options screen.

Thanks Boberro, I'll give that a try :)

I'm kinda just training with some of the weps in the SU-25T and on one of the missions it's about dropping a TV guided bomb on a structure. Problem is, even on full zoom the structure is not visible until I'm pretty close, it kinda fades in (on the monitor) so it's pretty hard to lock onto the building from far enough out and it's all kind of a last minute rush to get lined up etc.:megalol: So, what I need is a fix to increase the draw distance of objects in the monitor, thus enabling me to see them quicker, is that possible via one of the config files? AS far as I'm aware I don't remember changing anything so not to sure if this is default viewing distance or not but as I say, I need to increase it. Cheers gents :helpsmilie:

I think they "tripled" development time because they shoved it on the back burner while they worked on more lucrative military simulation type stuff:music_whistling: What, I'm wrong about that as well? Look, I just call it as I see it, it's not working properly, my machine is well up to spec (I'm a flight simmer fer god's sake :thumbup:) and guys, get this: A guy here gets 80 fps and turns on and gets 15 :megalol: Yea, it's not borked at all, my mistake.

Yea whatever, it still runs bad and it's only a small monotone screen. It should have been fixed before release but ED just shove things out and fix em later. (If we're really lucky) I love BS and I prefer FC 2 but that does not make it right that things are released like this. It's poorly implemented, the fact modern systems have problems says that clearly! You guys can all jump on the band wagon and trumpet ED all you like, I'm not happy with it.

Lower this, lower that, try this etc. It's borked OK. They have to fix it, I can run it fine with Black Shark and FC 1 with zero problems so stop making excuses about not being able to replicate it in house and fix your damn mistakes. ED get cut to much slack round here at times. We wait for stuff that should be done for far to long and tbh I'm quite fed up with them but as they are one of very few devs who are still making this sort of sim we are expected to put up with it. Someone has to say it:thumbup:

But you could check the allow recover button in the options and respawn. Kinda pointless as it starts you back at base but at least the dead guys will still be dead. Not an option I use though :music_whistling:

That's a good idea. A little bump here in case anyone has an answer.

That's what I mean :lol:

No idea but it bugs me when it yells at me to use it when it's already on. BUG?

Thanks man, Also, you've nailed the reason in a nutshell. It's simply easier to commit them to memory like this and god knows, there's enough of them to commit :)

We'll be waiting:)

Thanks for posting the track link mate.

Well it's not here in this thread now. Anyone care to link it or is it a state secret?

YES!! First thing I noticed when I started BS for the first time. Went to click some keys, found only the tool tip and not the key press. It was disappointing. This would be great

You know guys. I just received my TrackIR 4 through the post this very morning. It's working all lovely and fluffy in BS right now and it's IMPRESSIVE!! Seriously so. Thing that really bothers me is I was one of the very early adopters of Track IR 1. They brought out TIR2 and I didn't need it as it wasn't a vast improvement over 1. Not in IL-2 and LOMAC and not at UK prices. Then they brought out 3 with the vector but then certain games/sims would no longer support TIR1 and I was VERY pi$$ed. So, I swore off Natural point for good and said I would NEVER buy another product as I hated the way they dropped support for the early versions. Upshot is, I need TIR for BS so I had to go the route of Freetrak or TIR4. I went with the best. It pains me to say it:megalol: but they are. One thing, if they ever drop support for this version they will never get another penny from me.... ...unless they bring out a high res, virtual helmet/tracker...:music_whistling:

Here's a Video tut http://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com Just go to the Files/video section, producers note 10, page 1 I believe :)

Seriously, if you're not over clocking then cheap RAM is just as good as the expensive stuff. Still stay away from certain no name brands though. It just has to do it's job and it will. Your main criteria is just to make sure you get enough of the stuff ;)

I sense a bit of trepidation in your comments? No offence. I to have a few worries about seeing this great work any time soon now ED are involved. I'm thinking they will keep it behind closed doors until BS is ready to go. Grandsurf had already commented on a sample release, (I think it was one airfield maybe?) "next week" and that was a while ago. (can't find the post now) The guy worked hard (thank you GS) and it's his mod and I'm sure he will let us know when this sample might be ready, I hope..:megalol: Not trying to offend anyone although it probably sounds like it :helpsmilie: