Кош

Looks lively. Just a little recommendation - now weathering seems to be evenly distributed almost everywhere, while real cockpits have paint wear and chipped places worn to the metal only where actual WEAR - takes place. While other places keep being intact. Just take a non-worn cockpit an imagine where would your body touch it the most - floor, left board of the pit where you step over it from the ladder, places your wrists slide near the throttle.. So most of the pit is intact even after 10+ years of service, and some places get paintless in two months. Same with the grime - how come the rear panel behind the seat is evenly covered in it - yep there is oxygen bottle there but no oil or hydro filling caps. Otherwise, thanks for your efforts and good luck with the progress. PS - again we have a "tank armor with thick layer of paint" feel, while real cocpit panels are like a cofee/tea tin can - thin sheet aluminum with semi-gloss single layer of very thin spray paint. Those evenly distributed chips and dents in the bump map are just not needed at all.

Мои, выходные убил помнится. Для начала хорошо бы проверить взлетно-посадочные характеристики заявленным, макс скорость у земли и на высоте, что будет при превышении; полёт на разгон и потолок, скороподъемность. Если получится проверить дальность полета по документу - тоже было бы хорошо. Штопор... Тут бы узнать правильно ли он летает блинчиком для начала....

Приборы?!! - Триста!!! https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3576512&postcount=369 - вот так можно?

Вы можете в цифрах расписать в каком?

:megalol::thumbup::doh:

Там одинаковое крыло с одинаковой механизацией и оперение. Отличается развесовка(незначительно) и воздухозаборник. Оно не должно отличаться сильнее чем реальный Су-27 от ЕДшного. Хотя я конечно всё понимаю, посидеть пару вечеров настроить условия, полетать выдерживая параметры, пошаманить в Tacview, это конечно тяжело и лень. ЗЫ - разработчики признались что модель делали на основе данных по С, подтянув ПМ до его известных характеристик. Так что документы по С в нашем случае вполне валидны.

Сравните для начала с С. С тем что с таким же хвостом.

Вот читаю тред и пока не вижу ни одного сравнения графиков реала и модели. "Кажется, я думаю, должен, так а не так" - гуманитарии... При том что аж Чиж выложил РТЭ с характеристиками, испытывай не хочу.

Can mods please delete this?

Here's how its supposed to work and be used.

It shows a weather forecast for Mars. Completely useless. The piper even does not move on the bullet drop axis with the manual distance setting. You can still train with the fixed net.

Yep, we want a time travel machine:smilewink: Komsomol Warranty and all :smilewink:

Would send the devs a drink after my first radar autoranged guns kill. Really hope for a properly sized, aligned, calibrated and working ASP.

MiG-27K would cost a good separate 60 bucks, no less. Will eagerly throw them into the screen. Damn, it even has brrrrrt

Analog systems made of vacuum tubes and mechanics have a constant refresh rate equaling infinity. RP-5 radar refresh rate is based on dish rotation speed. If you see anything not synchronized with it - than its not complete yet. RP-22 of the MiG-21bis has much more work to do to pass its scan pattern, something like an s inside of S, while RP-5 has two opposite dishes which just rotate in one plane like an old police flash.

ПРИЦЕЛ!

Is afterburner on? Flying head on towards the missile is better since you keep your exhaust hidden with the rest of the aircraft.

Разрабы заикались о радикально новой кабине, так как оказалось что нынешняя - кривая геометрически и её не спасти. Может сделают и прицел, как знать... Пока вон Разбамы смогли, ждем релиза...

Never saw a photo of a PKI in a 25. Thanks!

MiG-21bis had that in real life. DCS implementation of ASP-PFD-21 is sadly a placeholder. As for "how could they abandon technologies" - its a good example of doctrine change during the generations of fighter aircraft. The first serial MiG-21F13 of the late 50s early 60s had an internal gun and a computing gunsight. Then it was decided that who would ever need a gun if you have guided missiles, and that nobody will ever merge because constant mach 2. PF, PFM migs didnt have a gun and had the same sight you can see now in DCS Mi-8 just to aim the missiles. Vietnam, Israel and other hotspots proved that wrong. Later 21s(1964 MiG-21S and on) had a gun and a computing gunsight returned. Still, dedicated interceptors like Su-15 still had that simple crosshair, and MiG-25 didnt have any sight or HUD at all.

Judging from the technical manual that is present online the only major difference between MiG-19 models is all-moving stabilizer or non-all-moving elevator that led to discrepancy in hi speed hi altitude controllability. So if we have an all moving tail aircraft made by an all moving tail manual it seems legit.

The cover is pure gold! But is it possible to see the original real world manual?

Отсканировать живого и обдуть. Как Хитблюры Феникс.

+1 for RU pit

В английской конфе признают что неправильно, и будет как надо. Земля вообще текстурой была а теперь рисуется проходами луча.