Vatikus

It is hard to know without seeing what you actually do... if you post a track, we might see where is the problem. Having said that, make sure that laser code is set correctly...

OK, repair did indeed fix this...

same result in both -25 and -30 in today's patch.

And yet, it has higher G limit than Blackbird ;)

As can be seen on screenshot... I was online and as I rearmed, the bomb shadow only came on for a split second then vanished.

I fully understand that full fair fight cannot happen in DACT, which is simply put - fine & desired. Fighting weight differences however can pose unrealistic advantage in some cases. Since time limited round is prolly not desired as is not too direct active judging, the proposed fuel variable is ok to go with by me and we can see how it will turn out for any tweaks regarding next event... Speaking of F18... have you tested dual rack pylons and their impact on performance?

regarding Microvax's post... no.3 ... I agree that time based fuel index limit is a flawed approach to making things more "fair" as it skews T/W relative performance. It is prone to end with one plane having UFO advantage in a duel. I look forward to read Microvax's suggestion

this is still present in latest OB.

BK90 has inertial system (IMU on attached photo) and it also has radar alt meter and digital computer which uses kalman filtering to keep it on course as best as possible. From my experience, BK90 underperforms (in sense how wind and terrain can influence it) in DCS...

Event: 1v1 Squadron Name: =37.Sqn= Black Squares Teamspeak/Discord: n/a; User ID @=37.Sqn= Vati#0189 Contact person: =37.Sqn= Vati Aircraft Selection: Mig-29 Pilots: SVN - =37.Sqn= Vati

At combat speeds 25 or 31 are flying 4.5g is more than enough. You need to remember to maneuver at high Mach, you are more limited to thrust than G. Mig25 and 31 will outturn most in sustained high speed turning.

That is correct... was about to write this but my mind had its own way :D

9.12 has IFF button on stick, while unlock was on the left side panel (as per attached image) 9.13 has these reversed. You have unlock on stick, while it has IFF switch on that left side panel with option to enable locking either friendly or not.

Tone is present in real life as well. Tone should as well be present in helmet mode, but due the simplified FC3 (among many things), this is not so...

=37.Sqn= Vati ....... f18

Fantastic news! Thank you for taking your time with my questions on this subject.

Yes, I understand fully where it comes from, it might be termin definition problem. "Autotrim" means that stick neutral position changes by the plane. In mig29 this varible is, as you said alt & IAS (as is same for many europian military planes from that time using QFeel system). Lets look the following image: In this image pink donates situation when stick neutral position does not change, elevator gear ratio does change. One can see that Mig29 stick neutral position is very important to the relationship of elevator deflection. If neutral position does not move, elevator is not moving correctly regarding to the gear ratio change! I understand that variable loading was left out even though DCS:MiG21 has it simulated good enough. No problem, I can simulate this with my own FFB driver as I already do (I was forced to write one because of this DCS bug: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=222759 ) However variable loading is not my main issue in my argument. The neutral position change is. That can be simulated for all types of joysticks as same type of movement is already simulated when autopilot is activated. .

Yu MiG29B However here is a collage from Polish and Russian manuals: It shows 27mm stick pull delta from 400 to 870IAS (alt<=1km)

Movement of the stick force neutral position? Xp1 donates the change from where Kp is 1 to Kp max in stick force. Kp ratio is controlled by Q-feel (ARU) system, as you well know.

Is autotrim simulated? It does not feel so, as I need to trim manually in the speed range (ias 400-870) similarly as is shown on drawing.

R77 goes active around 15km... you need to count yourself to get into a ballpark as there is no indication.

Answer to both is: It wont happen for FC3/MAC. I asked Chizh regarding these and navigation at 29 PFM release and he said what we have now is what we will have until FF module happens sometime in future if it happens at all... What we have is what one can have for $15 ...

Yes, 15deg is limit where mig pitch stability starts to become neutral in landing configuration ...

create own campaign with elements you are after

Not sure where you got those numbers from. Final approach 320, treshold 300, td 260 (aoa 11)... add extra speed depending on weight. It is recommended that you trim it for final... it will be much easier that way.