Vatikus

I am sure I speak for many when I am proposing that it would be a great improvement in simulation if more real forward view thru the windshield is simulated. Refraction effect can be easily simulated by simply 3d modeller faking the end result inside cockpit view. The deviation from reality via such decision will be smaller than what we currently have. This blocking frame while correctly drawn from blueprints unfortunately works against the desired simulation.

As seen on screenshot, reticle is not aligned correctly...

I am very disappointed with how cockpit view turned out on A8... D9 and A8 should be pretty much the same, however in DCS A8 is like someone feed it with cheese.... propotions are off. The first thing one notices is that huge bar, colored revi, then not being able to read top instruments... also instruments themselves are not the same... doesnt ED share resources between the projects? Shees... a big let down :( I really hope that this will be redone for the sake of quality it has for the non grfx side of the module...

It was super fun to fly Red flag again... I've quite missed these skirmishes! Thx to all who flew and 104th for organizing it...

This bug is still present. What is more if you do ingame ream the plane will not get correct fuel load nor correct fuel gauge reset when 3 tanks are used.

This is still not fixed... any news M3?

=37.Sqn= Vati MiG21

Then wait with the release until they can. Simple as that if you are decided to go on the path of payable DLC. You already managed to shoot yourself in the foot with WW2 asset pack dividing WW2 DCS MP community, so please do not try to repeat this. When it comes to such kind of DLC, it is never about that it is not free, but that MP experience should be as transparent as possible or else force everyone to upgrade, as such fragmentation of the community is not in your and our best interest.

https://forums.vrsimulations.com/support/index.php/Air-To-Air_Systems#Azimuth.2FElevation_.28Az.2FEl.29_Format

How TWS mode is nonfunctional in presence of jammer the way it is done in DCS 29/27 is simply madeup for various reasons known only to ED. And since there is no interest nor plans from ED to do all these more realistically, it is pointless to wonder why and how...

WCS in FC3 is simplified and thus one should not expect proper simulation as that's not the ED's goal with these planes. Sad but true, but once you go over this, you learn to compensate for such quirks in fight.

"Jolt" only happens if you are physically already passed the commanded G with your joystick once you activate override. If you are holding the override all the way, there is no jolt.. if it happens, check your joystick settings/curves.

I have tested this and also made it so that target a/c made a hard turn at launch... I've turned the radar off... missile did not correct itself until going active. If we look at the HB manual: "[...]when the missile is within range of its seeker’s ARH mode the AN/AWG-9 commands the missile to switch to ARH. Absence of this command via the AN/AWG-9 radar means that the missile won’t switch to the ARH mode." This indicates we have a bug! The next question. In another try, I've lunched aim54, this time to support it with radar all the way. However as target made a hard turn, my selected TWS track has dropped, and then after the turn was complete I received another TWS track and did not select it but aim54 kept smooth tracking as if midcourse updates to the target were not interrupted at all. What should happen in this situation is not clear from HB manual. Any takes?

If you use the FFB stick in both positions, pilot settings (trimmer position, forces) are carried over from pilot to rio position. And even when in MP, as multicrew, I am able to feel trim changes as RIO :) tested with g940

Quite a let down... at first I had thought that some settings got corrupted... While it is welcome to see that the engine sound is being worked on, currently it sounds as I am watching the mig from 5km... not immersive at all. As others have suggested, there are plenty videos from various sides and distances (as well as other dcs modules to hear the character and what can be done) to be used as a reference...

Please note that currently if stick is not on physical center, autopilot will not engage. Autopilot should engage when stick is at trim position (virtual/FFB center).

I confirm this bug... was wondering why my line is offset as there was no wind. It looks like INS is running instead of being on pause as well.

It is not that simple... wing of aim7 is aerodynamically worse than r27 reverse tapered... and since missiles maneuver, aim7 is taking more penalty in a comparisson to r27... now what is the net result, we do not know without a proper research. However DCS r27 is quite underperforming overall, that is obvious from how stupid it flies. Might as well be it is all related to DCS oxymoronic guidance &eccm...

GGTharos you fail to see the difference between max g of a missile and max g of its target (R33 example). Quoting max g of a missile w/o any reference to its speed where this is possible is useless information. edit: as you have mentioned r24 and it's 24g limit... I will add its max target limit: 7g

The R33 (410) figures you wrote are what is max target's G not missile's. But indeed it shows that when missile is flying super fast, it has problem pulling enough G.

Thank you for the report... it's good to see these being worked on... I hope adverse yaw and dutch rolling will be also worked upon as from videos these are still missing and are very important for slow speed/high aoa behaviour

Ok, I have tested more... if plane is set to hot start, if rio joins on ground there will be desync as described in post above if plane is set to hot start, and pilot tooks off and is in air.. rio joins in as 14 is in air, there will not be desync

If you spawn in a running jet, RIO and Pilot will not be synced... radar will not work (does not show any contacts, neither ground return) at all.

Too much smoke for nothing... FFB sdk&docs are readily available via DX... some of the HB guys have already worked with mig21 (which has it) when they were still a one team. So the issue is really only time/priority on their time table.

+1