Vatikus

Here are few photos which show A8 from july 44 onward with indication of "erhöhter Notleistung":

After some distance from the camera the external model gets a hole at some LOD level where the engine should be which creates m2k much harder too see as well.

Yes, I've proven how silly your point is :)

@NineLine I got that from ww2 luftwaffe ace Meimberg who is unfortunately now deciesed.. so I cannot give you a definite confirmation you look for. You might have more luck checking book like: http://users.skynet.be/Emmanuel.Gustin/index.html

But dont you see how silly that idea is? Fact is that button size and position is to not be able to trigger it if you are not really trying hard to get finger into a hole... it's as silly as my nail comment. Safety function should work as intended -> to not activate guns by mistake. We can not do that now, and that is wrong.

I agree with Wulf. The excuse written above is laughable... it's like saying, we should be able to shoot 20mm with safety on, because you can use finger nail to push it...

MG/FF - yellow (late blue) MG151 - blue MG131 - blue MK108 - yellow MG17 - orange

I am sure I speak for many when I am proposing that it would be a great improvement in simulation if more real forward view thru the windshield is simulated. Refraction effect can be easily simulated by simply 3d modeller faking the end result inside cockpit view. The deviation from reality via such decision will be smaller than what we currently have. This blocking frame while correctly drawn from blueprints unfortunately works against the desired simulation.

As seen on screenshot, reticle is not aligned correctly...

I am very disappointed with how cockpit view turned out on A8... D9 and A8 should be pretty much the same, however in DCS A8 is like someone feed it with cheese.... propotions are off. The first thing one notices is that huge bar, colored revi, then not being able to read top instruments... also instruments themselves are not the same... doesnt ED share resources between the projects? Shees... a big let down :( I really hope that this will be redone for the sake of quality it has for the non grfx side of the module...

It was super fun to fly Red flag again... I've quite missed these skirmishes! Thx to all who flew and 104th for organizing it...

This bug is still present. What is more if you do ingame ream the plane will not get correct fuel load nor correct fuel gauge reset when 3 tanks are used.

This is still not fixed... any news M3?

=37.Sqn= Vati MiG21

Then wait with the release until they can. Simple as that if you are decided to go on the path of payable DLC. You already managed to shoot yourself in the foot with WW2 asset pack dividing WW2 DCS MP community, so please do not try to repeat this. When it comes to such kind of DLC, it is never about that it is not free, but that MP experience should be as transparent as possible or else force everyone to upgrade, as such fragmentation of the community is not in your and our best interest.

https://forums.vrsimulations.com/support/index.php/Air-To-Air_Systems#Azimuth.2FElevation_.28Az.2FEl.29_Format

How TWS mode is nonfunctional in presence of jammer the way it is done in DCS 29/27 is simply madeup for various reasons known only to ED. And since there is no interest nor plans from ED to do all these more realistically, it is pointless to wonder why and how...

WCS in FC3 is simplified and thus one should not expect proper simulation as that's not the ED's goal with these planes. Sad but true, but once you go over this, you learn to compensate for such quirks in fight.

"Jolt" only happens if you are physically already passed the commanded G with your joystick once you activate override. If you are holding the override all the way, there is no jolt.. if it happens, check your joystick settings/curves.

I have tested this and also made it so that target a/c made a hard turn at launch... I've turned the radar off... missile did not correct itself until going active. If we look at the HB manual: "[...]when the missile is within range of its seeker’s ARH mode the AN/AWG-9 commands the missile to switch to ARH. Absence of this command via the AN/AWG-9 radar means that the missile won’t switch to the ARH mode." This indicates we have a bug! The next question. In another try, I've lunched aim54, this time to support it with radar all the way. However as target made a hard turn, my selected TWS track has dropped, and then after the turn was complete I received another TWS track and did not select it but aim54 kept smooth tracking as if midcourse updates to the target were not interrupted at all. What should happen in this situation is not clear from HB manual. Any takes?

If you use the FFB stick in both positions, pilot settings (trimmer position, forces) are carried over from pilot to rio position. And even when in MP, as multicrew, I am able to feel trim changes as RIO :) tested with g940

Quite a let down... at first I had thought that some settings got corrupted... While it is welcome to see that the engine sound is being worked on, currently it sounds as I am watching the mig from 5km... not immersive at all. As others have suggested, there are plenty videos from various sides and distances (as well as other dcs modules to hear the character and what can be done) to be used as a reference...

Please note that currently if stick is not on physical center, autopilot will not engage. Autopilot should engage when stick is at trim position (virtual/FFB center).

I confirm this bug... was wondering why my line is offset as there was no wind. It looks like INS is running instead of being on pause as well.

It is not that simple... wing of aim7 is aerodynamically worse than r27 reverse tapered... and since missiles maneuver, aim7 is taking more penalty in a comparisson to r27... now what is the net result, we do not know without a proper research. However DCS r27 is quite underperforming overall, that is obvious from how stupid it flies. Might as well be it is all related to DCS oxymoronic guidance &eccm...