msalama

Works correctly for me. You sure you don't have any easy flight options on?

Bought. This is one module I've been waiting for a long, long time. Wooo-hooo!

Fixed that for you.

Except that some civvie addons actually have it already. https://old.reddit.com/r/flightsim/comments/blvizt/you_shall_not_pass/

You just enable a parameter in the Shark's config LUAs somewhere. Alas, can't remember any particulars since I haven't flown the beast in years...

Yeah, that's the way to get stuff done and changed. Thanks Rel4y, good work and easily understandable :thumbup:

Haven't flown her in months, but coincidentally just happened to take her to an insurgent love-in as a party pooper with bombs and rockets today. No changes whatsoever to the FM that I can notice at least.

I'm only half following this debate, so had no idea there were docs presented. Regardless, if Yo-Yo rejected them, that's his prerogative and he must've had his reasons. But double standards? Where and how? I've seen people whining about the P-51 as well and they're not treated any different. Anyway, not my particular war this here so I've no need to convince anyone of anything, and have no need to continue this discussion either. So bye for now & out.

First, your hunches are worthless unless you provide some unequivocal evidence proving them right. Second, it's not our job to prove ED's sources, conclusions and extrapolations correct or erroneous, but yours, since you're the one complaining. Is that really so hard to understand or accept?

Some people always think a developer borks their planes on purpose because in their opinion said dev has a bias against their side. IMO that amounts to sheer boneheadness, but what can you do? Because nothing will make these folks change their mind anyway. Them's the breaks...

No idea. But I do notice that you like to troll people.

Well I think napalm is a horrible weapon and its use should be prohibited worldwide, but since it isn't and it exists IRL, we should get it too. Because as much as I detest it myself, I still think it should be available because this is a sim, right? Don't like it, don't use it, simple as that.

Shagrat: spot on.

Yeah, a package containing both the civvie and the mil (O-2A) version. Would buy it immediately!

No need, because it's being currently debated right here. And the reason is there's clearly a demand for DCS civvie craft whether you like it or not. Hey, just grin and bear it :D

Yeah, me too, a fully modelled Dak - or any multi-engine transport for that matter - would be a first day buy for me. And for the naysayers: no war without supplies and no supplies without heavies ;)

!!!!!!!!!!!

No difference as far as performance goes. Which, BTW, isn't even nearly enough, taken the current unhistorical competition into account.

Hmmm... well yes, was thinking about accelerated stalls versus those where you go below Vs and kind of got misled. You're right, exceeding critical AoA is always a factor.

What stalls a plane is either too low an airspeed since the wings don't generate enough lift anymore, or too high an AoA because the airflow separates from the wing surfaces. EDIT: Yes, a bad explanation, talking s***e here

Should they be prohibited from trying? Or would the decision be theirs? And how have the civvie craft already in DCS, such as the Eagle and the Yak, done?

I think they've changed it a bit recently. Could be it's just me, but I think I'm getting bounced around more now in a turbulent weather, at least near the ground. Have you guys noticed anything?

Ach, I should've said "yes, I wouldn't draw..." etc. because we're in agreement, but did not. Woe is me :unsure: EDIT: OP, get the plane, it's great.

I never said the FM has no affect on this, so you're not following anything, you're just putting words in my mouth. But that's your problem and yours only.

So I'm saying nothing of the sort, actually. Take your strawmen elsewhere, please.