Padonis

I hope that the Hornet gets CBU-97, MK-20 can be used to destroy trucks and nothing more. CBU-97 are even lighter than AGM-154 and I read in different places that Hornet was carrying CBU-97.

However, Hornet was abandoned for the F-16 ... We were assured that this is not the case :( . Similar threads have been closed to silence dissatisfaction. Only should it be this way? I am very sad.

I already thought something was wrong with my eyes. It is good that others also have this problem, because there is a chance that it is not a disease of our eyes.

OK - at the end of summer we were to get more information about the new addition for carriers. We have a week and a half by the end of summer, so it's probably a good time for more information? Unless there's nothing to talk about? I am very interested in this add-on and I must admit that I am very curious and impatient :).

Yes, I use a dedicated server.

For several weeks "MANPADS" have not been shooting at enemy planes, you can fly over airports protected by MANPADS units, just like over your own airport. I thought it was a temporary problem but somehow it doesn't go away. I play mainly in MP.

I play 95% multiplayer.

Insert these values in the LUA file. D:\Eagle Dynamics\DCS World\Mods\aircraft\FA-18C\Cockpit\Scripts\TEWS\indicator\RWR_ALR67_init.lua If you do not care about the RWR view in the F-18 cockpit, because it is located in a poorly accessible place. The RWR view on the additional monitor is more important to you. I suggest such settings: shaderLineParamsUpdatable = true shaderLineDefaultThickness = 0.06 shaderLineDefaultFuzziness = 0.03 shaderLineDrawAsWire = false shaderLineUseSpecularPass = true

I don't expect one Harpoon to destroy a ship, but after testing, I found it was doing similar damage as the AGM-65G, with a 135 kg warhead. And it often happens that they are smaller. AGM-65G is not detected by the ship's defense. I conducted tests on the Grisha Corvette.

I deal with them this way. I don't mind when Maverick caught something strange sometimes, a hot stone in the sun, a bonfire left by partisans. Because it actually adds some realism. However, street lamps are a bit exaggerated, it does not matter the time of day, time of year, whether they are on or off. They attract Maverick's attention like a red canvas for a bull ...

Of course, there is no Maverick what is a vehicle and what is not, but catching a street lamps in broad daylight when a vehicle is driving along the way? Like during the day this lantern is supposed to radiate thermally? I think my friend "NineLine" has not been flying A-10C for a long time and has not seen this problem. During the day, catching a vehicle on the road, where there are streetlights, is very difficult, you need to fly very close. Do the lanterns radiate heat so much when they are off? The problem applies to all street lamps, regardless of the time of day, these are not accidental or rare situations that a colleague describes "Imigrant", only continuous. I suggest you fly A-10C and check it yourself.

Unfortunately, this also applies to A-10C. Maverick and TGP catch street lamps (also during the day). Which is quite a serious mistake and is very annoying. The problem has existed for a long time, it has been described, but unfortunately there is no answer.

Let them do it today, little FIX is enough. :)

Unfortunately, in today's version of DCS World, these tables are not current. For example, mesh radars such as P19 are marked as "S" (formerly "FF"). Now different grid radars, different systems, are marked with the symbol "S". Track radar SA3 S125 is displayed as "3" (previously "LB"). The markings changed many updates ago ...

The Germans had Mig-29. Poles still have them. There is a saying. If you really want something, you can do anything. Mig-23 is created, and Su-17 is not model 4th gen.

Personally I am waiting and many other players on full modules Su-27 or Mig-29, not on those crippled models from FC. Of course, also on Su-17 and Mig-23. The red page is very poor, forgotten by producers of modules. There is nothing complete and more modern to fly.

Diagnosis by type of aircraft, unfortunately, does not work when the same planes fly on both sides. AWACS często brakuje w misjach, więc mamy tylko IFF. This in multiplayer missions works very capriciously, like RWR (has a long delay and is misleading). Range 20kts for IFF? Very often I have no identification with 5kts ...

Going this way, of course, I can land in the local Aero Club or in my wife's garden. However, we are talking about large airports, which are not currently damaged or disaster-stricken. :)

How many airports in the Caucasus has TACAN? ILS has more ... And how is visibility up to 100-200m, fog like milk, fuel is missing?

I know it. The question is: is there a chance for an ICLS system at airports?

As we know, the F-18 has an "ICLS" system. As of today, this system has only an aircraft carrier, which makes it difficult to land in bad weather at ordinary airports. Is there plans to introduce this system at ground airports, maybe at these airports what "ILS" already have? Is there plans to upgrade airports, TACAN, ILS, ICLS?

I confirm, often when you choose the Aim-9X, no sound is heard, sometimes it appears after the target has been caught by the radar.

I have been experiencing braking problems for a long time, I was joking with my friends on our flights that we need to install 4 brake lines, like on an aircraft carrier?

The quantity and quality of amendments to the F-18 in today's update, knocked me down :( . The light in the tunnel is starting to go out. Hope, however, is the mother of fools. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3968521&postcount=62

Small update. I made a SPIN switch, a small test and it will be painted properly.