Padonis

They wrote that the pre-sale price will be -30%. For the owners of F-18 they promised a big discount, but we still do not know what.

Everyone says what is missing until World War II, of course they are right, because much is missing. Of course, you can exchange endlessly, but I'm struck by the disproportion in anti-aircraft defense. Germany has various anti-aircraft guns, allies only have one Bofors 40mm gun. I realize that ED is waiting a lot of work and it is not as easy as it might seem, but when can we expect at least such alignment in anti-aircraft armament?

I wonder when we'll find out exactly what their plans are. I hope soon. Thanks to this, we will avoid unnecessary discussions and irritations.

I think the old version will remain, those who bought it have the right to use it in its current form. Everyone who wants to have a new version will buy it and will have the choice whether to recommend the current or the new A-10. It will be similar with K-50. There is nothing to panic. Personally, I can't wait and I wonder very much what we will get in the new version?

I have the same, MP with TWS enabled, IFF almost never works.

Thank you very much.

Can anyone describe which switch (which switch in HOTAS) is responsible and what it is used for in TWS mode?

This has been the case since the beginning of the TGP in F-18. I thought it was a mistake and then read that AGM-65 is taking over FOV. However, regaining control of FOV in TGP from the outset is troublesome. The question is, do others have the same problem, or can they have another method I don't know about?

Unfortunately, even after switching to a different weapon, I can't regain control over FOV and Cam TGP. I need to take over A / A combat mode and return to A / G mode to regain control of FOV TGP. Is there another method?

I'm doing everything right. Everything works well in the single player mission. Today I will check if the reason is not a change of weapons at the airport, whether the mission itself can be damaged.

I have a problem with AGM-65E. During the mission, when I am armed with TGP, AGM-65E and AGM-65F. If I use AGM-65F first, then after selecting AGM-65E later, I can't find the target illuminated by the laser. It can be found using TGP, but not using AGM-65E. Multiplayer mission. Of course, the laser code was entered correctly.

Does the Harpoon still have too low explosive power? For this reason, I prefer to use AGM-65F, although the range is smaller, but it does more damage. In addition, ships do not defend against them.

Sometimes I get nervous easily and often say what I think too quickly. Unfortunately, because of my comments and nervous statements, I already have 60% of warnings in this forum. :( I know that sometimes you have to bite your tongue before you say something, but sometimes I just can't help myself. I'm sorry. "Viper" will receive TWS before "Hornet". I feel a little disappointed because I've been waiting for him since the release of Hornet. This seems a bit unfair to the owners of F-18. "Hornet" jumped to the background and it is rather difficult to deny it. It's hard, I don't understand it, but somehow I have to survive. I love playing DCS, but I won't buy an F-16 so that I don't have more nerves and disappointments of this kind. It's a simple solution that will bring relief not only to me :). But what will happen when such a solution is chosen by many of us?

All topics about the F-18 update are closing. They send us to an the news letter. Dear Mr. BIGNEWY, as a customer I am more interested in the results than the information letter, which contains information on what you want to do now. Unfortunately, I am not comforted by the Weekend news, because the effects are not very visible.

I paid a lot of money for various modules, I can't imagine paying for the subscription yet. Subscribing or buying modules are two different rules. But what about people who have already bought modules? Will you tell them that they bought something under certain conditions and now they have to pay again? It's not that simple, two systems would have to exist simultaneously. That a new customer will have a choice and not hurt old customers. Without it, there will be processes.

I hope. Otherwise, I will not consider buying a new DCS module, especially early access.

If someone were waiting for the F-16, and there are those who did not wait ... I might as well say that if they finished the F-18, the F-16 would look better after the premiere. Next year, ED will have another great project, I'm afraid the F-16 will be in a situation where the F-18 is now. I have several years behind me, I hope I will live to the end :) .

With the current needs of AGM-62, Walleye are now as useful as a hole in a bridge. If I could choose armament, I would definitely like MK-77. And of course the TGP pod, which actually shows its position in "HUD". Unfortunately, we have no influence on what and when will be done.

Two months from the release of TGP and basic things are still missing. The "Target Designation Cue" on "HUD" is still missing. This is very troublesome, as it is not known where TGP is directed at the moment. ED can do what he thinks is right, but it should not be at the expense of other modules. I knew I would have to wait for the F-18, but it doesn't look encouraging.

Are there any progress on the MK-77?

Theoretically, CBU-99 is more recommended, it should be more effective on armored targets. However, the damage model is not very good.

I know it's just a substitute, but you can charge and drop it on target. The fact that ED does not simulate an atomic mushroom is completely understandable and I do not regret it.

And Mig-21 has it and how you explain it to me ?

The hornets carried CBU-78 Gator and B57 and B61. I didn't hear anything that they were supposed to be.

How many MK-20? I can't destroy a BTR with a central hit.