Jump to content

Brk195

Members
  • Posts

    37
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I’ll take 3 just for myself!!
  2. I'll join in on this, you have a guranteed purchase in me and at least 4 other people I know! The EQ is a dream, but I'll settle for an EDA as well
  3. This 100% I feel like the F-35 announcement opens us up to having a bit more flexibility with older modules even though I would argue that was already the case with the Ka-50 and it’s extra pilons.
  4. Hello are there no changes for this patch ?
  5. I actually refunded it and bought it back after a few months, the refunding ultimately was a knee jerk reaction after the first few issues and bugs popped up. in the end it's a functional jet with radar modelling superseding ED's own offerings (that by itself speaks volumes) so I'll keep it and enjoy it for as long as I can. Originally I thought to get the Chinook instead, but looking at the current state of that Module I'll stick to my F-15 and hope for the best going forward.
  6. I’ll just add my voice here in support of someday (hopefully soon) getting this version, we really need what I like to call a proper E version (no disrespect to the EE lol). This version is second only to the EQ in my F1 variant wishlist, I believe in you Aerges !
  7. I'm not going to jump to conclusions here and point fingers since OnReTech have not stated by name the party behind the reasons for their decision, but logic points towards one specific party especially since ED have stated they were not aware of any of this. What I'm hoping for is for Ugra to reverse course if they are the ones behind this dispute and if not to refute this whole thing and point us towards who's responsible. Wether it's Ugra or someone else, this sort of thing should happen before money has exchanged hands, I can understand looking out for your interest (even if ill advised and done in poor taste) but not like this, and not by depriving paying customers of what they paid for.
  8. Oh I see, since I saw some of the other devs put in their change logs I thought this was the main patch, thank you for the info !
  9. Hello ! any word on Aerges skipping this last update ? maybe holding off for something big I hope.
  10. It honestly feels like every other patch has to by law ! introduce some drama and turn into a crapshow. I seriously hope this was an oversight or mistake, there is literally no reason for this.
  11. Hello. can you point me towards where to find an older version of simapppro mine updated and it just crashes after start
  12. Hello. I encountered this bahvior for trhe first time on a flight yesterday wasn't doing anything particularly out of the ordinary (15k feet 500kts) when suddenly had all sorts of warnings turn on lost my hud and radar. Is this really fixed and how do you mitigate this when it occurs ?
  13. Would just like to add that I also noticed this issue. I am using the very latest open beta
  14. Hello. I have a question about the F-18 profile for dcsflightpanels, on the radio panel the small inner knob changes the volume just fine but the bigger outer one doesn't change the radio channels can I fix this somehow ? Thanks.
  15. Yes everything is indeed on the same network. Tried contacting the developer through their website but got nothing
×
×
  • Create New...