

Brk195
Members-
Posts
35 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
This 100% I feel like the F-35 announcement opens us up to having a bit more flexibility with older modules even though I would argue that was already the case with the Ka-50 and it’s extra pilons.
-
Hello are there no changes for this patch ?
-
I actually refunded it and bought it back after a few months, the refunding ultimately was a knee jerk reaction after the first few issues and bugs popped up. in the end it's a functional jet with radar modelling superseding ED's own offerings (that by itself speaks volumes) so I'll keep it and enjoy it for as long as I can. Originally I thought to get the Chinook instead, but looking at the current state of that Module I'll stick to my F-15 and hope for the best going forward.
-
Mike Force Team started following Brk195
-
I’ll just add my voice here in support of someday (hopefully soon) getting this version, we really need what I like to call a proper E version (no disrespect to the EE lol). This version is second only to the EQ in my F1 variant wishlist, I believe in you Aerges !
-
Northern Israel / Southern Lebanon detail removed
Brk195 replied to Flying Toaster's topic in Bugs and Problems
I'm not going to jump to conclusions here and point fingers since OnReTech have not stated by name the party behind the reasons for their decision, but logic points towards one specific party especially since ED have stated they were not aware of any of this. What I'm hoping for is for Ugra to reverse course if they are the ones behind this dispute and if not to refute this whole thing and point us towards who's responsible. Wether it's Ugra or someone else, this sort of thing should happen before money has exchanged hands, I can understand looking out for your interest (even if ill advised and done in poor taste) but not like this, and not by depriving paying customers of what they paid for. -
Oh I see, since I saw some of the other devs put in their change logs I thought this was the main patch, thank you for the info !
-
Hello ! any word on Aerges skipping this last update ? maybe holding off for something big I hope.
-
Northern Israel / Southern Lebanon detail removed
Brk195 replied to Flying Toaster's topic in Bugs and Problems
It honestly feels like every other patch has to by law ! introduce some drama and turn into a crapshow. I seriously hope this was an oversight or mistake, there is literally no reason for this. -
Remove/Reinstall Device Driver for Winwing (or USB device in general)?
Brk195 replied to ESzczesniak's topic in Winwing
Hello. can you point me towards where to find an older version of simapppro mine updated and it just crashes after start -
fixed [FIXED] Help Me, Alternators failing!
Brk195 replied to dudeman17's topic in Bugs and Problems
Hello. I encountered this bahvior for trhe first time on a flight yesterday wasn't doing anything particularly out of the ordinary (15k feet 500kts) when suddenly had all sorts of warnings turn on lost my hud and radar. Is this really fixed and how do you mitigate this when it occurs ? -
DCSFlightpanels (DCSFP) thread. Saitek Pro Flight Panels & DCS
Brk195 replied to a topic in DCS Modding
Hello. I have a question about the F-18 profile for dcsflightpanels, on the radio panel the small inner knob changes the volume just fine but the bigger outer one doesn't change the radio channels can I fix this somehow ? Thanks. -
Yes everything is indeed on the same network. Tried contacting the developer through their website but got nothing
-
Searching for serve Hello. I've recently been having this issue where the app just says searching for server and can't detect the server. any ideas on how to fix this ? I tried opening ports and checking my firewall stuff but nothing seems to work. Thank you in advance.
-
With all due respect and while I think that you and the few people critical of the reaction of many in the user base have some good points about excessive hype, you are very much mistaken if you think that being silent about this decision would have changed people's reactions. You seem to be missing the main point which is that people think this is a bad move regardless of what their expectations were, I don't personally have any strong feelings about this and I wasn't expecting anything from FC4 but even I was quite perplexed with this. Saying FC4 would have been a great opportunity to add new airframes or upgrade older ones with newer features etc doesn't necessarily mean that that's what I expected or that's what I thought I was promised that's my and many others' opinion and I think it's very clear that even on this forum which is usually very understanding and tolerant of ED's moves a majority of people have felt that this is not the best decision. Besides as paying customers people have the right to give feedback no matter what they thought they were or were not getting. So instead of concentrating on why or how people are being critical concentrate on the feedback and criticism itself and take it into account.