Jump to content

Jester986

Members
  • Posts

    1676
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

1 Follower

About Jester986

  • Birthday 01/01/1980

Personal Information

  • Location
    United States

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. From big YouTubers sure but I guess no one else from DCS was there? Would have been nice if someone at ASC could have put together a promo video. Maybe Baltic Dragon could film himself flying the supply mission and kind of talk us through it since not much seems to be out there?
  2. I love my honeycomb throttle and yoke I got for the civi sim but it looks like there’s some good ffb options now.
  3. With all due respect to wags, I’m more interested in what the developer says. They have better idea of where they want to take the module in the future.
  4. I put it in the wishlist but the dev “someone” replied not anytime soon but hopefully in the future
  5. Awesome! Thanks for the reply.
  6. Just thought I’d chime in. Was looking to move to this as a primary trainer after messing with it for awhile I’ll stick with the c-101
  7. I just realized I can’t bind the knobs for the heading and course bugs. Would be nice if we could get more key binds.
  8. Silly question but will it be possible to fall to my death as load master? Or will I always have a strap keeping me safe. It’s not an important feature, but it would be kind of amusing.
  9. Title says it all. It’s operational. Can we have rapid dragon?
  10. Makes total sense. I just thinking getting it in front of the airline crowd would be good for the module and DCS.
  11. ASC should get this to some “other” sim YouTubers. Could bring a lot over into DCS.
  12. I 100% agree but there have been clues to some issues at ED for awhile. This will generate a huge amount of cash for them so there’s no stopping it. Probably their answer to avoid a subscription model. The more positive possibilitie is they have a deal with an Airforce to make an F-35 and they got permission to release it to DCS if they tweak a few things off from actual and don’t admit that they’re working for a government customer.
  13. I don’t care about balance. DCS should NOT be balanced because the real world isn’t. But I am highly skeptical an accurate version can be made and lowering the standard of what’s required to make module is disappointing. But I’m sure it will be a cash cow for ED.
  14. Yea. I no longer buy everything that’s comes out just because. We don’t have any better options to take our business elsewhere so we’re stuck with ED but it’s definitely a hostile relationship.
×
×
  • Create New...