mobua

Sorry to say but issue still prayers for me. Is there something specific I can do to reset? I get the logging in notice when starting DCS, it fails resulting in an error code 502 specifying that my modules will be deactivated.

Thank you, appreciate the clarification albeit a bit disappointing. Just for my piece of mind, is the following by Jacobs true for the mirage?

Bumping this thread as I’ve received no response. @Kercheiz?

Hi, Enquiring as to if there are any plans as part of the B33 roadmap to add an in-cockpit pilot body? Thanks!

Will the M2k be getting any switchology/clickable button for arming the ejection seat?

Is "Get DCS Coords" still functional in 2.8? Mine seems to have stopped working...

Lol, it was supposed to read the JHMCS.

Well it seems like the powers that be marked it as correct. I find the logic odd but I have nothing to refute the current functionality. It’s just that I always thought the JHMCS was a repeater of the HUD information.

When switching the speed to display GND speed I noticed that the JHMCS display only shows CAS and is not repeating the ground speed indication shown on the HUD. Can someone confirm this behavior? Is it correct or is it a bug? Thanks! Edit: I would like to add, I noticed the issue while taxing on the ground. The HUD was showing the ground speed while DJ hammocks was set at 48 kn suggesting that it was displaying the CAS speed.

Any news on this issue? The F-16 is severely crippled in MP as of late. I also suspect there is a connection to the HSD/L16 as the abnormalities appear to effect the FCR and offboard systems concurrently.

Any news on this issue? I'm still having the same problem as of the latest open beta and vaicom/voice attack versions.

@BIGNEWY Bumping the thread as I'm concerned with it falling into oblivion in the wishlist section. Is there any update on this that you can share? I fail to see how the FCR and the AIM-120B/C can be correctly modeled without the aforementioned modes. Thanks!

I'm also under the impression it was functional in previous versions. Also, could you please send me the thread where ED has taken a stance on the matter. I failed to find one prior to posting. Thanks!

Hi, With the HP Reverb G2 I'm getting a blue/white light on the edge of the screen. It's more profound during maneuvering and seems connected to the face mask setting. The blue/white light matches the projected mask area as seen on the monitor. When MSAA is active the same area is colored black leading me to believe that the face mask is the culprit. Is this a known bug or is it working as intended? Thanks!

Hi Frederf, How does one utilize this in the Viper, I'm familiar with CATA and intercepts so my question is more "put the thing on the thing and voila". Basically, what do I need to do with the cross to run the intercept if that makes more sense? Thanks!

As per the title, I noticed that while in RWS we are able to change the azimuth setting (30/60 deg) by slewing the TDC cursor to either edge of the FCR page. I was pleasantly surprised as the setting also seems to be persistent and doesnt reset after returning from another radar mode or MFD page. This however does not seem to apply to the FCR in TWS mode, as such my question pertains to wether or not this is an upcoming feature or is the behavior working as intended. It would seem a strange design choice to offer the function for RWS only while omitting it for TWS, especially since one is able to change the azimuth with persistance through the OSB buttons. Thankful for any insights offered!

I understand that you might be reluctant to share a date, could you however shed some light on the reasons for the revised/delayed timeline? Any particular bumps in the road you can share with the community? I believe the original FM was slated for 2021 Q3 (October/November)? Thanks!

Not sure how to interpret the post being moved to the wishlist but it does not bode well in my book. The entire TIME page and the DELTA TOS is a feature that IMHO should be on the planned roadmap. Just my two cents, do what you will with it.

Thanks for the clarification Frederf. Title should be changed to: "AIM 120B/C - Is Husky/Pitbull WIP?"

There are those better qualified than me to answer that question. What I can say for sure is that there are approximations of M-pole (MPRF) and F-pole in other sims. Furthermore, I would assume that if they are able to implement A-pole, M-pole should be similarly sensitive. TLDR: No I'm not certain.

Shame, seems as if it should be reasonably simple to implement. Here's hoping for a push in a timely manner, pun intended . Thanks for your reply!

Indeed the M2000C is a very potent foe! However if you can force him slow while you stay fast, the tide turns in the Vipers favour and quite handsomely so. How you go about doing this I leave to each his own. But I'm quite certain that if you succeed in executing said gameplay you ought to be coming out on top more times than not versus the Mirage.

As per the title, is the DELTA TOS on the ICP TIME page functional? I tried inputing the DELTA TOS as I usually do in that other sim, however I'm unable to get it to accept my inputs. Has anyone been succesful in utilizing DELTA TOS, if so please share your insights. If not, hopfully ED might shine some light as to wheter or not this is a planned feature for the DCS: F-16C. Thanks! @BIGNEWY@NineLine

Hi, Not really sure wich section this question belongs as it partly pertains to the F/A-18C, F-16C and F-15C. I was wondering if with the ongoing updates to the AMRAAM the Husky MPRF mode is under consideration or on the way? Currently in the Viper for instance, I believe we are lacking the M-pole indication wich does carry a tactical significance. Furthermore, I do believe we are also lacking F-pole indication as the Viper currently only shows A-pole and time to impact. Any clarification or update on the matter would be much appreciated. @BIGNEWY@Wags@NineLine Thanks!

I second this. When it comes to the mirage I find that generally if you can get them below 380 kts while you stay fast and above 420 you can kill them in the vertical. In particular what you want to do is a climbing helix turn and they will fall right off and you can prosecute them from there on. Alternativley (and even better!) would be if you can get them slow on the deck. This opens up the rate fight to the Vipers favour aswell as limiting the M2K in the vertical. What surprises me alot in DCS is how certain jets, in particular the F/A-18C, is able to go toe to toe with the Viper in the vertical while maintaining a tighter turn. Take the climbing helix turn for instance. I would assume that a persuer on the inside of that turn given the same intial speed would burn off knots at a higher rate. This often seems not to be tha case where the Hornet in particular will climb on the inside while maintaing an equal distance (i.e. not falling off). As things stand, and assuming the Hornet FM is correct, it is a hell of a beast and doing much more with less Gs. From a pilot perspective, why would you ever choose to suffer through 9G when 7.5G will get the job done? I'm hoping the updated Viper FM will prove my statements to be foolish.