Krippz

That's a good PS job.

Wow

I spent some piggy bank money on FSX so yes I would pay for commercial add ons lol.

Hah; guys you know what that means, we have bested Topol-m. This rounds' on me.

Wags has come out of protective custody :D. Good to see you sir!

:doh:Oh noooo Topol is here. We are all doomed

Queue in x-files music

Topol will be in here shortly to rain on your parade Lucas :music_whistling:

Thank you for the thoughtful and well balanced response.

;) indeed.

We found something that we agree on; if only world peace was that easy :lol:

With all due respect Falcon's dynamic campaign is the holy grail of campaigns. It appears that you we're playing the campaign on "Rookie difficulty"...:D. Some people have the false impression that you need to let the ATO (Air Tasking Order) do everything which is false, you need to provide SOME minute tasking at times (e.g. task recon flights, JSTARs, tankers, AWACS, etc).

I'll give it a shot: 1). I would LOVE to see a dynamic campaign right now in DCS Black shark however a lot of other things need to be worked out first. The engine needs more optimization, ground vehicles need better AI (they don't disperse when fired upon),etc. You recall how in the Falcon series your able to listen to radio calls for every flight; that adds so much more immersion and increases your situational awareness tremendously I would love to see this worked into the DCS series. 2). This can be attributed to a number of things but the possibilities include: Lack of adequate funds. No desire to include a dynamic campaign. Or lack of manpower (I believe the ED team numbers around 50). 3). Who knows, ED has been mum on this. I speak to a lot of gentlemen who have purchased BlackShark and some of these same gentleman have uninstalled BlackShark and the problems that I've listed in my first answer are why. Their are existing threads about this topic and you will surely be scolded for not searching but don't fret it happens to the best of us.

Can we have a patch that allows your singleplayer logbook to carry over to multiplayer a la Falcon 4.0 Allied force?? Puuuurrrrty please ;):D

-2,-3, -4 and -5 should be sufficient. One down three to go.

Sooooo we should be expecting DCS Eurofighter?:D:joystick::pilotfly:

I'm unable to download the files aswell. Can someone re-up it.

I just want more IMMERSION. ATC vectors,running ground troops. I want intel reports and a dynamic campaign. I could care less about graphics.

lol what you rather the classic battles of Vietnam and before?

The biggest challenge with formation flying in Black Shark is frame rates. I cannot maintain FPS =>30.

Indeed it is; bring it on :joystick::pilotfly:. I expect the T-50 OVER TIME to be comparable to the F-22. The biggest challenge Sukhoi is going to have is keeping the price down while retaining 5th gen fighter qualities. This is their first VLO project so I doubt the cost of the aircraft will be <$100.00 million US dollars; but Sukhoi may surprise me.

Here you are wrong my friend; the Su-30MKI does not have a AESA radar while the F-16 block 60 does ;). So in a BVR fight the F-16 SHOULD be able to see the Su-30MKI a lot sooner and be able to dictate the terms of the engagement. WVR is a different story.

I don't want to digress from the topic but in a realistic scenario a lot of enemy aircraft will be taken out with cruise missiles and JDAM's at standoff ranges. The F-22 and the F-35 will have a clear advantage over any 4th gen fighter and enemy ground based radars. So a numerical advantage is negated by technology.

The fact remains that the Su-27/Su-30 family of aircraft will not have any other advantage over the Mirage-2000 or F-16 that the F-22 faced.

Great video. It has me salivating for DCS F:15 :D