-
Posts
69 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by headbreaker_ger
-
correct as-is MARK point disappear when rearm
headbreaker_ger replied to flankerjun's topic in DCS: F/A-18C
Well the "System" for Markpoint is no dedicated System, its part of the NavSystem. The only thing that change is, that with Weight off Weels the Option is initialized and that even if you had former Selected MK3 for example you would be back at MK1 there is no word, that the whole Markpoints will be unavailable with WOW or something like that. The Second Point, I don't know where this comes from but Rearm, Refuel, Takeoff again is not just a simple DCS-Thing, correct me if I'm wrong but its called "Quick Turnaround" and even I admit, its mostly uncommon today, remember the Hornet is no young lady, the initial design derive from a different situation. I really hope someone with first hand experience can say something about that because for me the NATOPS do not state how it behaves. -
Addon Tents, Watchtower, UH-1-Cargo
headbreaker_ger replied to upuaut's topic in Static/AI Mods for DCS World
+1 Would be much appreciated -
correct as-is MARK point disappear when rearm
headbreaker_ger replied to flankerjun's topic in DCS: F/A-18C
Are you sure about that? The NATOPS clearly stated: So, if I understand the system correctly, you can't mark any points while you have WOW, but it would be not really useful to just erase data? The NATOPS explicitly says the OPTION need WOW. Is there any source-material that states that the points get erased? -
Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 312 Du suchst nach Leuten zum gemeinsamen Fliegen? VMFA-312 ist eine kleine deutsche Community mit Fokus auf die F/A-18C und Spaß. Wir fliegen in einer entspannten aber professionellen Atmosphäre und trainieren die realen Prozeduren so weit wie möglich, um ein authentisches aber trotzdem spaßiges Erlebnis zu erzeugen. Mit Simple Radio (SRS), Gameserver, LotATC und Discord stellen wir eine gute Basis, die wir mit Dokumenten und Hilfen erweitern, um dieses großartige Flugzeug zu erlernen. Dazu bieten wir neben spontanen Flügen, auch jeden Sonntag ein gemeinsames Training mit unterschiedlichen Schwerpunkten an. Missionen fallen in der Regel auf den Samstag, diese Umfassen gemeinsame Liberation-Abende, eigene gescriptete Missionen oder auch der gemeinsame Besuch eines Public-Servers. Auch unter der Woche ist bei uns immer was los, ob nun entspannte Ausflüge oder gemeinsamen Gesprächsrunden, Unterhaltung gibt es genug. Jeder ist herzlich willkommen, unabhängig von seiner DCS-Erfahrung. Mit unserem Ausbildungskonzept bringen wir Neulinge in DCS schnell und sicher ins Cockpit, können aber auch den ein oder anderen alten Hasen nochmal überraschen. Wir freuen uns auf alle Piloten, die Lust haben, tiefer in die F/A-18C und die mit ihr verbundenen Abläufe einzutauchen. Noch Fragen? Schau Doch einfach auf unserem Discord vorbei, dort findest Du weitere Informationen und Mitglieder, die Dir gerne weiterhelfen. Fight´s on! Homepage: vmfa312.com Discord: https://discord.gg/carJZrK Sprache: Deutsch Funksprache: Deutsch & Englisch Aktivität: Missionen, Events oder Public Server Raids jeden Samstag 20:00 - 23:00 Trainings mit Theorie und Praxis immer Sonntags 19:00 - 21:00 Dazu häufige spontane Flüge unter der Woche Struktur: Entspannte Atmosphäre mit flexibler Planung Gemeinsames Lernen in angenehmen Tempo Simple funktionsbezogene Rollenverteilung Aufnahme: Jeder ist willkommen
-
Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 312 Are you looking for some guys to fly with? VMFA-312 is a little German Community with focus on the F/A 18C and fun. We fly in a relaxed but professional ambience and practice the real procedures as far as possible, to create an authentic but still joyful experience. With a Simple Radio, LotATC, Gameserver and Discord we offer a good basis for flying as addition to that we provide documents and help, to learn this great Plane. Everyone is welcome regardless of their level of experience. Got questions? On our Discord you can find further information and people to ask. https://discord.gg/carJZrK Fight's on!
-
reported TK PRES LO above 20k feet with empty centerline tank
headbreaker_ger replied to Nealius's topic in Bugs and Problems
The Error ist still existing, it can be fixed with cycling the bleed air knob and pull the bleed air aug knob but thats not how it should work,... The official FA 18 C Pocket Checklist statet " INFLIGHT 1. Bleed air switches – CYCLE If caution remains or reappears - 2. Do not exceed 0.9 Mach in dive " And how the horet bleedair system is build it dont makes much sense, to pull the aug knob. If you look up the NATOPS, you will find a diagram of the Air-System, the Aug Pull switch should only open a valve to a ( in midair ) non or low pressurized system thats used from the APU und Ground Air -
I will give it a try later, maybe its broken after the last patch,...
-
I havent tried the newest patch but normaly Lasing with a JATC or FAC should work, have used it a couple of Times. DO you have hav Track of that? Have you used the proper Radio-Communication?
-
+1
-
I can tell you that's a classic German adage and it's maybe a bit exaggerate. But there's nothing strange about it,... sure I say often Thx and also I said also thx to ED a few days ago but here the case lays a bit different and yes as I said Im also frustrated about the situation but now because of delay
-
I think you miss read what some people here meaning, many people have no problem with the delay. The Discussion is about ED want to call the Hornet out of Early Access and rename Features, they promised to deliver in EA as "Improvements" and that the problem for many here. It's not that we can't wait,... as I said days ago, just let the FA18 in EA as long features are missing or not full implemented. And Im sry but if now a Mod says "But the INS/GPS is working" and try to define Early Access, say the use the specs from Steam and on Steam the FAQ says ~After EA comes the Release-Version,..... yeah than sry but something here is fishy. And ED has a reputation-problem,... Im sry but so it is,... and even I dont know Wags, Kate, Nine, or or or,... Im sure they are nice people and nobody wants to attack them and yes now comes the BUT.... ED did promises, they take the Money THEY set the Price! And I didn't Buy the Hornet in Sale, I nearly bought all Modules even I only really fly 2,... because that's a Way you can support and got something,.... And yes now some people and also me are frustrated, because we're getting excuses, but they don't tell us WHY they want to do this, so we have to speculate and maybe the reasons they have are others but as long they don't tell us and try to find excuses,... they just rake the frustration,... They say " we hear ya" but where is the Poll about the EA release by the end of the year, with missing features, sure,... most of the Improvements come later BUT as I said so often by now, you never can be sure,... If ED don't implement a simple thing like a beacon for a plane or at least 3 full Modules,... how can I be sure they will bring the full INS/GPS system or the ATFLIR and so on, these things are FAR more complicated than a beacon,... and you can defend ED, and to a certain point that okay,... but also critic is right and important, because you don't get better by strokes on your Back you're getting better by show your critics that you can improve. Nobody says thank you because you did your job. That's where you get your Money for ;)
-
The Throttle is sold
-
Greetings, I'm selling my around one-year old Virpil Mongoost-50 Throttle. It's in good Condition, works fine, and I am happy with it. I just selling it because I order the WinWing Hotas. Price : ~ 150 € + Shipping. With best regards
-
Sure things have prices, nothing wrong with that so far, so but know let us think why did ED put this price to the module?mhhh maybe a higher price wouldn sell better? Maybe with a higher price the over all money would be far less? What you are suggested is not only really really short minded at all it also doesn't make sense, so you put a price for the EA and also for the Release, so less people come in EA and less people disagree with the ED behavior,... but ED also makes less Money and at the end of the day Money runs ED. Not your strokes, not this debates, money. So ED, calculated and said "79$ is the way to go" with that they put a list of features and a promise, because without trust, EA dont work and without EA no money while developing. And this whole argument would be much more calm, if ED final would tell us why they think "Features" are just "Improvements", why they want to deliver a not-feature ready Product as final,... or at least as "Not EA" and on Steam that is Release-Version! So ED puts the Hornet out of EA,... great WTF do you guys think what happen at Steam? You think everybody will be that happy as you are? "Oh great the most realistic FA18 by far ( because no competition ) but mhhhh something not quite right ,... oh maybe nothing" And after the Shitstorm a Steam begins,... who is calm the new player and prevent bad Reviews? Because puppy protection is gone after EA,... And even 79$ my be not much money for you and hell yeah nothing for me,... for some people its a lot,... and they want to get what was promised and not a kind of shady businessman "the rules can change anytime" So if ED needs money, find other way,.. heck do a fundraiser what so ever,... I for myself really fly 2 modules but nearly bought all, because thats my way of support, but I'm a point I will not longer support ED as I did before. Don't get me wrong, its total okay, that you are happy and you want to support ED but criticism is also a form of support, because many people here try to prevent problems and tell why they see that in that way,... and if something happen you disagree with, its better to call it our instead of backstrokes and best hopes,... after a disaster everyone known it before ;)
-
Even if I think 3rd party devs are on another hand its EDs responsibility And as he said it isnt all, go to the Anton-Forum and read the discussions
-
You are aware, that ED never has implemented the beacons for the German ww2 birds, i guess? There was a Post from someone with a whole list of incomplete things. Its not just a label, its a statement, new players will buy it and think its a release version, but it isnt, its not fair to the customer and not fair to the community. You simply cannot sell features as Improvements and that's the point ED already changing the course,.... now core-features are Improvements and maybe some day,... the features will be get lost with the next project And after the last situations, the trust has already a crack to be honest,... bad communication and doubtful decisions, and this is only the next one and there are much to come,...
-
We have 33 Pages in this discussion ~ 1/2 of the post addressing the "out of early access" soooooo the poll is easy. " Put F/A out of EA at the end of 20 or Let the F/A-18 in EA as long all features on the list are missing and only bugfixes and not announced are in planning? or I don't care " If the decision on that isn't final, the announcement sounded definitive on that point, I'm sorry but I guess if someone reads the discussion, he comes to the same conclusion, the community don't want the F/A18 out of EA as long features are missing. Maybe I'm wrong but that's my impression. But for my understanding, at the moment its more sugarcoating "Its complete, we just bring IMPROVEMENTS later" Sure,... ATFLIR is an "Improvement" not one of the original features, working S/A and AUTO mode for the Countermeasures also Improvements not part of the System,... and the list goes so on,... If I repair a car,... I change the brake fluid but the brake pads I put in later as "Improvement" sure thats no problem at all. Who needs brakes if he has A/C right?
-
So you get the overall frustration, acknowledged the wants of the bigger part of the community and,... just goes and ignore that? Because, if you stayed by your current plan, you will do exact that. And you don't meet the customer, you scam him, because you say "Hey our Hornet is not early access" but I guess you also don't say on the Shop site *half of the features are not here yet, performance is like on your Atari 2600 and maybe we never finish the model like the ww2 war birds and other stuff,... but hey maybe we bring F/A18-2 next year and sure that one will be finished ..... Sry for the hard words but I am so angry right now really,... I really dont get it,... you have such a great playerbase, streamer, content-creator,... the only thing I can say,... Maybe it is like so many dudes sayd before,.... ED just scam people and finish nothing,... it is to cry for,...
-
@Wags @NineLine @BIGNEWY my question is simply, why putting the F/A18 out of EA? There must be a logical reason why you guys have that plan and please dont say the state, because as you see most user disagree on that point. Because you guys bought up steam So even the steam FAQ says after early access -> release-version! release-version=feature complete I guess most of us agree ED is doing a great job but, at the moment, there a so much decisions where you can see the shitstorm coming every time. For example the SC Delay gets communicated at release-day and now this announcement. And guess what's happen if a player buys the FA18 because he thinks is "released" and find out its not done,.... just because the EA list is shorter? Because maybe some more people buying the module? Core-Stuff is not finished, and don't give me that "The INS/GPS is working,... bull****" we can't use GRIT, there's no Alignment, we can't Re-Align, Navigation is a core-experince in flight sims and its by far away from ready,... Bring new toys like the GBU later,... finish the core systems ( ALL, now half*** stuff ) It was the ED promise to bring the "most realistic" Model of the F/A 18, and sure there's no competition but as my old teacher always said, do it right or not at all.
-
Sorry to say that but his Post is totaly on topic because how can we discuss a Roadmap without discuss the credibility of the old "promisses" How can we be confident that after the Hornet is out of early access the "improvements" are made and Not been Set forever as might be imptovements? Im not really sure if I can suggest a new player to buy a Modul after all this.
-
Im sry but the existing system is FAR FAR FAR away from complete, existing or how ever you call it, its an simply button on everything is running system and nothing more,... it is not worth to call it a simulation of anything,...
-
Greetings, First of all, I got one major issue with the roadmap and to be honest my fist thinking was "What the **** is wrong with you?" "DCS: F/A-18C Out of Early Access Features" I'm sorry but for me that's simple not right. Out of EA is in my understanding, the Time the model is nearly feature finished. I don't understand, why ED always chose the way, where you can see the Shitstorm coming. I mean there are announced features and improvements with are core-systems in my understanding, the only reason to say its out of EA is, so they can say it's no more EA. And with that many players will fear they never complete the work, like in the German WW2 Warbirds with the still missing Radio-Navigation-Beacon ,..... Let the F/A18 in EA for 21 and make the Module Feature-Complete, to the last System, don't put it half ready in the store like it's a finished module. And Yes I know Out of Early is not the definition of "Finished" but that's how many players understand that. In the Improvements-List are so many teased things we are waiting for,... for me also the ATFLIR is a thing,... I think its important, to make one step at a time, but do it right,.. let the FA18 in EA and complete the work,... and after the Module is Complete, you can bring "Improvements" but Improvements ≠ Features. One thing I really want much higher on the List and for me is a CORE-System = INS / GPS full simulation and alignment (carrier and ground) & Possibility to use Grid-Coords. There are no hard feelings on my side but I'm true disappointed I have to say,
-
A big thank you for the hard work tonight
headbreaker_ger replied to Larkis's topic in DCS: Supercarrier
AFAIK ist not clear at this moment, at least I have no idea but that didnt change, the great work of the devs and especially I think after the other Topic was a partly toxic, a "thank you" is the least we can do. -
A big thank you for the hard work tonight
headbreaker_ger replied to Larkis's topic in DCS: Supercarrier
absolutely on point :thumbup: