Jump to content

Rockrend

Members
  • Posts

    93
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rockrend

  1. Thanks very much, I’d appreciate it if you could check and let me know your findings.
  2. I'm running DCS 2.5.6.52437 and have a question regarding the operation of the ground spoilers. In previous versions...with flaps up, the anti skid/spoiler brake switch set to either BOTH or SPOILER BK and the throttle at idle with WoW, the inboard spoilers would deploy and the outboard spoilers would remain down. I have been told this is the correct behaviour but as of now the ground spoilers will not deploy until the flaps have been lowered and then both the inboard and outboard ground spoilers deploy. Is this a bug or the correct behaviour? Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
  3. I'd really like to see that script. I've been thinking about how to do this for a while now.
  4. Viking 1-1 is using the scenario which is the subject of this thread. “Undesignate” is a required part of the procedure, although there are significantly fewer times you need to do it now.
  5. Check to see if the elevation of the waypoint is at ground level. If not, then set its elevation at ground level and try again.
  6. Thanks very much for all of your work. Your guides are really an excellent way to learn a new module.
  7. Hi, Can someone please help me to identify what information I’ve failed to provide in the post. I don’t seem to be getting any acknowledgement from either NineLine or BIGNEWY, that they are willing to reconsider the initial “correct as is” statement. Any assistance to point me in the right direction is appreciated.
  8. Hi, Any chance this can be looked into again please? Thanks in advance.
  9. I'm seeing the change in flight profile as well. It is definitely different from recent updates. I've included a track from the default AGM-88 mission in the Caucasus where you can see the missile begin to track straight, then loft and pitch down to the target. Can the devs please acknowledge this change and confirm it is now the correct flight profile. Thanks in advance. AGM-88 Lofting.trk
  10. I think this has now been fixed in the most recent update. Can anyone else confirm please. Thanks in advance.
  11. Hi Nineline Thanks for the reply. I get this module is EA and that things must change over time to improve the accuracy etc. What I was trying to do (perhaps very badly), was confirm that this aspect actually had changed its operation...and when that change occurred. Thanks again
  12. Any ideas when this changed? I recall it previously working like the OP described...pickling the weapon at the start of a line of vehicles or runway for example, rather than waiting until the + on the BFL is in the middle of the target objects. After looking at a variety of YT video on this topic, it seems to confirm that it used to work differently before. Thanks in advance.
  13. Hi, Following the last stable update (27/08/19) I noticed the Camera View Angle Limits line in the Views.lua file had changed from 180 to 140. I personally find the effect of this on my default cockpit view, is too zoomed in now. Will there be any detrimental effect in me editing the file and changing back to 180 for the Camera View Angle Limits. Thanks in advance.
  14. This has been a problem for some time. See - https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=238829
  15. I’m not sure if this bug has been fixed or not... See the following thread - https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=238829
  16. No problem. Happy to help out. I had exactly the same problem before I figured it out.
  17. Have you checked to make sure the elevation of the target WP is set to ground elevation. It hasn’t been mentioned so I thought it might be worth a try. Not relevant for AGM-65E but necessary for delivering GBU’s in CCRP. Hope it helps.
  18. Thanks very much #Grimes. Appreciate your reply.
  19. Thanks for the input #AnimalMother711 and #Elysian Angel. Can a dev please look into this and let me know if this problem will be addressed in future. Thanks...
  20. I've noticed that now the AGM-88C works very well for the F/A-18C, its use by AI has gotten progressively worse. I suspect this may be due to the removal of lofting for SP and TOO delivery modes and the AI not being "tuned-in" for these changes in the missile. The AI used to use the AGM-88C very successfully previously. I've added a very small mission to demonstrate what I'm seeing using the F/A-18C, but I've also tried it in the other AI aircraft that can use the AGM-88C. The missile simply doesn't reach the target. Grateful if ED can confirm what I'm seeing and then make the necessary changes to allow the AI to use the AGM-88C successfully again. Also grateful if other users can confirm they are seeing the same as me. Thanks in advance. FA18C SEAD test.miz
  21. If you mean at the beginning of the video when the pilot is using the AIM-7, then yes.
×
×
  • Create New...