303_Vins

Sorry Guys i have uninstaled M-2 from my DCS for now. Each time i get in to cockpit i got FPS drop or even often DCS crash. In my favourite planes ILS function well and no crashes. So i dont want to waste my time. Have plasure from flying not from fighting witg DCS or Razbam. Maybe should check waypoints locations. Probably the previous waypoint ( landing WPT minus Landing WPT) should be placed on radial not more than 90 degrees from Final radial inbound.

Why You people do not read all with understanding? Screens are from previous mission as i have wroten before. Next I wrote....After editing WPTS in Mission Editor. Than flew new mission with WPT-5 and 6 as i Have mentioned above. some screens... Mission editor https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BIl2kFk86yUFtZbc_2oOFP6UH71Dl0XQ/view?usp=sharing Instrument Settings https://drive.google.com/file/d/16bPvOVEKpwMGn2t6lkjY9zeyHiiKnO3G/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ke5spKNk4QYPfFiZ_mcdgNPqajx4wTje/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/185sGI29XYKqGWzkZQFoiNhDpDR-O19up/view?usp=sharing Effects Incorrect WPT Indication on HUD. (opposite to HSI) https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LjZchk4xylDwStSKzPrpE8UGICe9NxRY/view?usp=sharing runway https://drive.google.com/file/d/1H1jVaesvcsbMfwX6JDETuW1kIyiytjO2/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hrKMPf9dhYagNmGTjMKPJYRDNgRayVqe/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xjnJ2_jngWmJzzXMnKmvZwgzcrCAaPdr/view?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ya0lNTVNmnU43U_4cJ-NM_ZVKbYSZtpV/view?usp=sharing WHERE is WPT ? HERE. Probably drifted because of Alignement done using external power. That may be the problem. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1P-jHB4VS1byblDNyjreAzASiRTgZx4ve/view?usp=sharing As U see instruments are correct. Probably the cause is Alignement executed using external electric source . Probles happens every time i make ILS Alignement that way. Goin to check normal start... ADI shows ILS neddles correctly. By the way. U really funny guy Kercheiz. Troll master

Barren discusion. SeeU. The latest... 2.7.1......last one Waypoints were edited in mission editor. 6- Kobuleti Landing. 5- Kutaisi with correct elevation CP/PD correct in both cases SET.... TY !

Yes. Look at screens above. Without this setting is impossible to use ILS properly. Do You need more ?? The screens says EVERYTHING MUST BE SET CORRECTLY. If i did not mention it is not equal i did not use... Some more brain work PLS. Screens were made before WPT edition. I this case WPT-5 was the Kobuleti. Everithing functioned well. I made tests with WPT-5 Kutaisi and WPT-6 Kobuleti than.... WPT-6 was Landing defined this time. Wghat U do not undestand ?

When ATTH + BALT is set even during level flight, aircraft commence slowly fly nose down. More and more. Do not keep altitude at all. Keeps but just 20 to 30 seconds, than begins to descent... Speed is correct, throttle correct. No any inputs to HOTAS done... after AP engaged... Can anybody fix it PLS ?

Is it possible to add option to completely remoove underwing pylons for F-15 in Mission Editor ? For Dogfight purposes...?

Chuck`s guide says about Declination input in INS. It is not obligatory. Anoug is to put in True heading directly. Than set HSI to NAV/TH mode. As U can see in screens above i fly TH on HUD 070. This is Kobuleti RWY 07 TH. Magnetic is 064. The problem is... Not always ILS fuction correctly. And function only for RWY predefined as Landing WPT in Mission Editor. I`m well prepared to fly any mission at any map.... I did make kneeboards. Caucasus for example: https://drive.google.com/file/d/15UUIVxgW0_27AGLm7et0pMG1P6kNFlua/view?usp=sharing I never use F10 Newbie, unreallistic view. :))

So. The witness is not anough ? Without csreens or tracks U will not check it ? I do not have reason to lie. I`ll give You my last example. Wind DM-060 (240 Nav) 6 kts. I defined center of Kutaisi RWY as WPT-5 with correct ground elevation. Defined Kobuleti as Landing WPT-6. Tryed to land ILS at Kutaisi. TH=074.0 degs. elevation 148 ft. Stored NAV, all staff as should be in cockpit. Slope 3 degs. Only ADI ILS indication appeared. No HUD indications. So tried to land at Kobuleti TH= 070.0, Slope 3 degs. All instruments correct. ILS111.50. TACAN 67X. WPT-6.... And.... No Course line on HUD. Synthetic runway appeared at the top of HUD. Not on the ground. Previously landed at Kobuleti was correct indications. When did not edit WPTs. PLS DO NOT TELL ME I`M NOT ABLE TO SET INSTRUMENTS CORRECTLY.

Yes? Go fly some hours and test !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Plendy BUG aircraft

O Yes. Why not ? Does this combination makes bug ? Bug apeared in this config. I have jetisoned Mk-82 an begun AA fight with 530.... And everything goes wrong in system.... I got another question. Why the hell normal ILS do not function on HUD but on ADI. he? Should I use only runway predefined as landing WPT ? FC-3 is more functional....

I wrote.... There is probably BUG after using Selective jettison.... Look PLS Why people read just piece of text ? Pull from context... What i did. I have deleted bugged mission. It helped. Im affraid problem reappear when i use Selective jettison again.... I suppose there is BUG with Mirage when using Selective stores Jettison. After this, weaponry system do not function properly. RDR do not unlock TGT. Must switch off RDR to clean its memory. Starting mission again and choosing Mirage crashes DCS. Not always but most of cases. Finally, reinstalled Mirage module, deleted bugged mission. Now ILS function well. No DCS Crashes. Im going to test weaponry system. And never use Selective jettison....

1- WPT is defined as Landing WPT. 2- Kobuleti 111.50 ILS 76X TACAN 3- Mirage receive ILS tone audio. 4-everything stored as it should be. 5- No ILS symbology on HUD, no ILS on ADI 6-HSI stored TAC 7- ALT RDR & ALT RDR indication is on. Afer using 530, or checked by button in weaponry panel. U can uncheck. But when return system to 'Neutral" 530 is checked again. After using selective Jettison, for example Mk-82. System do not uncheck it. The S disappear but it is still checked. Try and uncheck, than U will se the difference. Some combinations of check and uncheck on taht panel builds internal bug.

They robbed Mirek with this tear. After using the 530 mode, you cannot uncheck 530. You uncheck and then select Neutral and there is a check again. It is impossible to completely enter APProach mode. Does not find ILS. Second BUG: You will lock an air target and never unlock it anymore. You need to disable RDR. Selective jettison does not automatically deselect. The lamp is not on, but it is marked in the memory ..... AFTER the dump of the tank, the tanker refills endlessly. Bug on bug !!! [01:41] I already felt like Mirek

Syria ILS BUGS update Beirut Hariri -- RWY 16 ILS 111.10 don`t function. ILS RWY 17 is OK Bassel AL Assad -- RWY 17R ILS 109.10 Only Localiser function. Glide slope do not. What is interesting... Opposite 17R direction 35L Localiser function also. Even when downwind.

Correction & adjustement. ILS BUGS All Caucasus ILS function correctly. Persian Gulf: Al Dhafra --- RWY 13 L ILS 111.10 function only when wind is towards runway ( inverted wind-ILS direction relation ) RWY 31 R ILS 109.10 same as above. RWY 13 R ILS 108.70 do not function at all, no matter wind direction. RWY 31 L ILS 108.70 as above. Channels 24 and 48 (probably ICLS do not function at all: Hornet UFC says: ERROR ) Khasab ---- Well done ! RWY 19 ILS 110.30 function well at any wind directions, even downwind. Fujairah ---- works fine, but there are similar obstacles: mountains. ILS shoul be excluded from ILS-wind relation just like Khasab. Dubai --- ILS RWY 12 L & 30 R function well, but... RWY 12 R ILS 109.50 do not function at all. No matter what wind is. same with opposite RWY 30 L ILS 111.30 do not function at all. I will test Syria later

I Noticed ILS BUGS in relation to wind direction. Wind speed setting more than 6 kts and parallel to RWY. For example AL Dhafra. ILS works against wind & Runway in use. RWY 13 L has 128 degs True/126 Magnetic. Wind NAV set to 130 degs. ILS 111.10 works fine. But landing must be against ATC runway in use. 31. Same with RWY 31 R 308T/306M. ILS 109.10 MHz works fine but landing is with wind from my back. 310 degs NAV. Downwind landing. It is the most important to fix. AL Dhafra is important AFB in the region. Should fuction well.

Not certain situations almost all situations! 120C fired from F-15C TWS fly straight, loft and begin endless climb......to space mabe ? No cranking shooter if U wana ask. Same STT. Not guided. Trash. Useless missiles at all. Visual mode sometimes function well. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rJUHHH9ZsPIdmyoh7cFru6A13xxnc0Up/view?usp=sharing In my opinion, problem is not in missiles. Radar and it`s bahavior is guilty. It seems TWS do not function as TWS but "SOFT STT" switches from TGT to TGT when fire. Than "SOFT STT" is Broken.... All is broken. damn. again ... 1 Year of development: difference- Easy kill is now impossible to kill. We are back at february 2020 and worse

Launched AiM-120 From F-15C in TWS mode do not fly any kind of pursuit to TGT. Just Loft and climb continuosly. It happens In multiplayer. Didn`t check SP. When fired to multiple targets, each one fly same way. Lofts itself and than wasted.

Yes . 3m square. Gives Echo. Echo. Echo = contact. Yes or not ?. -1.0-1.0-1 . U need more explanations ? How M square gives T-38 ? similar ? what docs says ? Any elimination problems? Deduction problems ? Is JF-17 Stealth technology versus T-38 ? Is APG- 63 (V) 1 Mig-21 like technology ? Go to cockpit F-15. Check your self... U will see what is going wrong. I guarantee surprise...

Yes. Fix the radar please. Guys above are right. Now Radar is worse. It is not possible to work BVR properly in this circumstances. For Example: instead of detect JF-17 Hi aspect from decent distance. F -15C DCS is able to detect at 37 nm !! When fighting at 400 level JF`s SD-10 allready flights towards me. 37 NM is less than SAR ( safe abort Range ). Even.. it is exactly MAR ( Minimum abort Range at 400 Level). Next... AiM-120 C at 400 level fired from platform flying 1,5 Ma could be launched From 48 Nm. Radar is bottle neck for 120C in this situation. JF-17 is Stealt fighter? To obtain good SA is not possible last times because of broken radar. Sorry I`m not native english.

Last Upadte changelog: There is information about anabling navigation data:Enabled navigation data loading for all existing terrains. Added navigation data for Syria. What is that mean? RSBN, PRMG, Radio Presets? What navigation data? Where could I find data. Is there any documentation?

agree 100%:thumbup:

. OK do`nt forget F-15 nose wheel shimmy after NWS disengage. Pls. & external pisition/nav lights. Night HUD, RDR, RWR, brightness, ability. Pls

. cORRECTION. Alt Hold Function when ATT Hold is ON. No Subject.... Must make some tests. TY