Jump to content

despinoza

Members
  • Posts

    123
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by despinoza

  1. Yup, they're a lot of aircraft that needs a little love
  2. Duh. My bad
  3. It can be attach anywhere
  4. you can use simshaker for aviators with the sound module.
  5. I give a bump cause it would be a massive upgrade in vr be able to click things and not fail in the attempt
  6. All temporal AA create some ghosting, that includes DLSS/DLAA. But imo with some sharpening is good enough especially in VR cause it removes the shimering
  7. i'll do a clean install. But it's weird causee it only affects when i use motion blur,
  8. noBe, i did it now to try the msaa thing. But i don't. Maybe is a thing with quadsview or something. i'll do more test later
  9. That didn´t work. i´m using DLSS at the moment but either way i tried msaax4 on the options.lua
  10. uploaded. like i said, it`s only when i enable MB. really weird
  11. I was trying some settings and when i enable motion blur DCS crash. Maybe there`s something i don`t know and MB is not compatible with VR? I use the pimax crystal on PIMAXXRdcs.log-20231113-230221.zip
  12. Yes but it takes me some time. So i votes no
  13. second that. dlss or taa (or both) is a must for any vr sim imo, otherwise is a shimmering fest.
  14. are u sure you are not GPU bounded?
  15. like always depend entirely in what was your bottleneck. OP owns a 4090. I have the same system 4090 5800x3d and i see the upgrade in heavy scripted situations.
  16. DLSS already manage shimmering very well cause like TAA it uses motion vectors.
  17. i feel you have an AMD mobo, a PCIe USB 3.0 or up card will resolve your issue. That´s what i did before HP send me the new cable.
  18. Also DLSS, at least in other titles, manage shimmering better than MSAA. Looking forward to test it
  19. AFAIK DLSS uses motion vector like TAA so it would be easier to implement TAA along DLSS
  20. Would be a dream come true... For now just a dream i just saw the 2023 and beyond... i eat my words. Thanks ED
  21. The module is not even finished as it is.
  22. Warping in the G2 for me at least is minimal and only appears in the far edges, The P4 in other hand is really present and start aroung midway to the edge making it really anoying and for me, it gave me headaches. I also bought the P4 searching for an alternative to G2, but belive me that the P4 is not the budget replacement, the lack of DP buries it.
  23. owner of a G2 and a P4 here. In summary. the G2 is still the king in a budget for DCS P4 lenses are amazing and it has a little more fov than the G2 but.. has some warping when i move my head around giving me a headache also latency is too notizable and the compression is there ruining the hi res panels. Performance is maybe 20% worse than the G2 with openxr also and the G2, cause it uses DP, looks better. can´t compare to the Q2 cause i don´t have one
  24. for me is like it has delay. adjusting the curves doesn't help for me
  25. you can totally bind left and right mouse click to your hotas and use your head to select the switch. In my opinion it`s not great, especially with switches too far behind in the cockpit
×
×
  • Create New...