-
Posts
101 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Fynek
-
If it could be done within one year from now, it would be totally awesome.
-
But then it wouldn't be high fidelity would it? I mean if you can do things in the front seat that you are not supposed to have access to unless you are in the back seat in real life. I'd rather have some kind of "Jester" AI to be honest if it is the case. Or are most functions in the back seat available to the front seat pilot in real life?
-
I would prefer the Mirage F1C for reasons of simplicity, as others have pointed out it would be faster to complete and release than a ground attack/multirole variant or two seaters. Also i think it was the most common export version so it makes more sense to have the interceptor instead of the multirole or the rarer two seaters version .
-
Awesome! Can't wait for it, excellent news indeed
-
I think that they are doing their best guys, they are just under staffed and overwhelmed by the amount of work.. We need more 3rd party devs not less so even though we paid for this and every opinion must be respected, lets not discourage Razbam from doing additional modules.. there is a way to let them know we are annoyed by the waiting but recently they pledged to finish their modules before releasing new ones so that is a honest approach towards the community. I mean especially with ED (unfortunately) doing WWII stuffs... that means less time, energy and resources devoted to making truly ambitious and complex projects like modern jets with all their systems simulated... Heatblur and Razbam are our only chance right now of having more of those released (and finished..) at a steadier pace so lets encourage them so that they have more incentives to communicate with us more regularly.
-
Thank you for your reply Jojo, I will replay this mission and try to provide a track. It only happened to me once so far, the first time today actually ( I am new to DCS, since 2 weeks only) but it is nice to hear that it may have been reported before which implies that Razbam are aware of this minor issue. EDIT : I flew this mission again tonight to try to reproduce the problem and post a track but I did not have the huge drop in FPS by switching to D/RLT this time. I only had a small drop. Could be an one off or else i did not reproduce the conditions of my earlier flight when i had this issue. Hmm strange.. but a good news either way, as it means it is not as bad as i thought if i cannot reproduce this issue consistently. If it happens again i'll make sure to save the track.
-
[REPORTED]Nevada 2.0.3-big FPS drop when radar is turn on
Fynek replied to Grafit164DK's topic in Bugs and Problems
Unfortunately it has not been fixed on the Mirage 2000. The only fix is to turn radar altimeter off for now. My apologies, i should have posted in the Mirage section first because i don't own the F5E and it is possible that it was fixed on the Tiger already. -
I have found another issue that can drop my FPS from 60+ to minus 10fps. I was playing the Mirage campaign mission #2 today. I aligned my INS and proceeded to fly the mission but at some point, when i switch to D/RLT on the PCN switch, my fps suddenly dropped like crazy to below 10, slideshow. Moving the knob to any other position fixed it. It is not game breaking since this position is supposed to give you distance to waypoint and heading which i can read on the HSI anyway, but I don't know if it has been reported, i checked right now in bug reports and did not find it. The first issue with radar alt would be more urgent because it is quite useful in low visibilty.. Would be really nice if they look at it.
-
Thank you very much!
-
Hello, I wanted to ask if I am the only one who has a very annoying bug that makes my FPS go from 60+ to below 10fps when i turn my radar on at low altitude in the Mirage 2000c. I dont have this bug with any other module and when i searched on google for a fix, i ended up on this thread :https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=171415&page=6 However it is in the F5E Tiger forum and not in the Mirage one, therefore to increase the chance of eventually fixing this serious bug on my end, I thought it would be useful to first ask if anyone has this bug before i post in the bug report section. When i turn my radar on up high ,i have no issue. When i lock someone i have no issue. But when i fly very close to the ground or at very low altitude and turn my radar on, my fps drop like crazy to below 11fps. As soon as i turn off my radar they go back to normal to 60fps. Anyone experienced this problem? For info, my cpu is AMD Ryzen5 2400g, with Nvidia GTX1060 6gb and RAM is 16gb. Thank you for your help.
-
[REPORTED]Nevada 2.0.3-big FPS drop when radar is turn on
Fynek replied to Grafit164DK's topic in Bugs and Problems
I have the issue as well, whenever i turn my radar on at low altitude with the Mirage 2000C, my fps go from 60-70fps to 5-10fps. Any chance this will ever be fixed? it is almost game breaking for me. I basically can never turn my radar on at low alt. I dont own the F5E but in all other modules that i have i dont have this issue, it only happens with the Mirage 2000c. My cpu is AMD Ryzen5 2400g with 16GB of RAM, GTX1060 6GB with latest drivers and windows 10. -
Yes I agree Vietnam could definitely be awesome, it has everything from sea to land areas, jungle, cities and could integrate many of the modules. Would look very different than any map we have so far.
-
Well it is nice to hear that they are still working on the Mirage and the Harrier, it makes me optimistic suddenly. I thought it was a much smaller team than 16 people but if they only have 3 coders and several projects, it makes sense that they can't progress on all fronts quickly. I wish them well though, hopefully both released modules will get further improvements and bug fixing over time.
-
+10000 This sim is totally fantastic and has absolutely no equal, long live DCS blyat !!!
-
One thing is for sure, in the market of flight simulations, they are number 1 in sales. Though i do not approve of their latest waste of energy and resources on WWII stuffs when you can already have entire historical battles simulated to an at least comparable level of realism and immersion (if not more due to more maps/planes included per purchase) and priced much lower like IL2 Sturmovik BoX. I wish ED would focus on what they do best, which is Cold War and Modern Jet/Heli simulation with all their systems with an amazing level of details... That is unique on the market and they have no equal with that, no competition whatsoever. This is what most of DCS fans want to see, just looking at various indicators. I would rather see ED focus all their talent on what they excel at and let 3rd party devs to take care of simple modules like WWII/WWI. Cause with all the energy they've spent, we'd already have the F16 by now and possibly other exciting high fidelity complex modules that are worth the price. Just my opinion though.
-
It is like comparing the current Mirage 2kC with the F/A 18 Hornet basically, the latter is a 15 years more recent aircraft with newer avionics. Hopefully we can get a Mirage 2000-5 at some point, that would be a good match for the F16 that we will get. Would be nice to have a Panavia Tornado at some point as well, i really like the machines of 1970/1980s, they hit the sweetspot for me since BVR combat was yet to become the norm. What this sim is lacking IMO is a modern high fidelity Russian aircraft of this period :/ MiG 29 or at least a MiG 31 would be amazing and give any plane a run for their money since no plane would be able to fly as high and catch it at Mach 3, could be very interesting.
-
I thought the Persian Gulf map was a smart idea. Pakistan/India/Kashmir would have an interesting potential as well. A map of ex-Yugoslavia would also be nice in terms of topography (sea, mountains, beautiful country sceneries) but yeah maybe it would be too similar to Caucasus in game. Otherwise a map of Greece/Turkey perhaps or an Iraq/Iran map due to the history and potential to field a lot of planes that we have in DCS. Lybia would be too close to the 2 maps we already have with desert areas and Korea/China would need a massive map with a lot of sea area. Having only Korea would be boring IMO, though something in Asia would be original.
-
I care :D I love the airplane and recommend it because for the most part, it is functional and you can do everything it is supposed to do in A2G ( though i did not try to attack ships with it yet, not sure if the missile hits at the floating line when selecting the option, instead of hitting a ship like a normal target). I bought this module last week at full price... hoping that Razbam will continue to work on it and trying to encourage them to do so as this airplane is quite unique. One thing that i liked is that in the latest DCS patch, there were improvements on it so i can only hope that at some point all the functionalities will be modelled and bugs ironed out. I would recommend buying it because as it is, it is a decent module but still unfinished. For people who are knowledgeable about it, i understand their frustration though. What would be nice is if the developers communicate with the people who support them financially by buying the module. This is what i would expect from them as i understand that as a company, they must make money so it is okay if they work on other modules but considering the price and the fact that it was released long ago, I would really appreciate at the very least if they would let us know that they are working on it even if they do not want to commit to deadlines.
-
VULCAN FORGE - A Realistic 10 Mission AV-8B Campaign on NTTR
Fynek replied to Sedlo's topic in User Created Missions General
Ohh so that is the reason for sure! Indeed i do not own this map, i have the Persian Gulf map and Caucasus map. Thank you so much for your work on this campaign and your help Sedlo. Thank you SGT Coyle for your advice but without the map it may be the reason why it doesnt show up. My apologies, i did not know that this campaign was on the Nevada map. I may purchase it in the future and then it will work. -
VULCAN FORGE - A Realistic 10 Mission AV-8B Campaign on NTTR
Fynek replied to Sedlo's topic in User Created Missions General
Thank you very much for your quick reply , i really appreciate it! I have the steam version of the game, 2.5.4.30386 so i think it is the stable one. Maybe this could the issue? I post screenshots below to show where i install and what i see in game in the "Campaigns" then My campaigns or if i go to "Missions" then check in campaigns/en/. Many thanks for your help again -
VULCAN FORGE - A Realistic 10 Mission AV-8B Campaign on NTTR
Fynek replied to Sedlo's topic in User Created Missions General
Hello, I unzipped this campaign into "C:\Users\*yourname*\Saved Games\DCS\Missions\Campaigns\en" as advised but it does not show up in game, whether i check in campaigns or in missions/campaign. I also tried to install it in the root folder like the other free campaign available but it does not show up either, whereas the other one works. Can someone please let me know if this campaign still works as of May 2019 and where they installed this or is there something wrong in my install? I dont have DCS beta but normal DCS 2.5.4 i believe, could that be the issue? Thank you very much for your help, I would love to play it. -
Thank you kindly for taking the time to reply! I use Trackir but wanted to have more height for landing but that is fine, just wanted to check if the seat switch works for everyone or if it was just in my install. Oh so that was the parking brake possibly. Thank you :)
-
Hello, I purchased the Harrier recently and reading this thread has made me a bit depressed to be honest :) This said, I truly hope that Razbam will keep on working on this module (and the Mirage which i also purchased) and eventually finish it as i love this aircraft. I have a simple question please as i do not want to necro old threads : Is it just in my module or does the seat adjust switch in the plane not work? I tried to raise my seat to no avail. Is there a way to make it work please? Another question please : Does INS alignment work everywhere or is it normal that i could not align properly in the training session ( timer kept flashing 0:00 and wouldnt start) or did i do something wrong? Thank you!