czarnyolek

My one said: "30, i thought you said 15?" Can i ask ED directors to provide their e-mail for my wife, so she can ask them for reasons? Trust me, she wont put up with "amount of time spent on developement" :megalol:

You got very good point there. I hate to see titles like FIFA 2009, or ProEvoSoccer 10 wich are nothing else that previous release with just minor changes. I just hope ED wont go this way. With Flight Sims we dont have much choice anyway. Its just a few titles on market. Once and for all, im not that tight to not pay 30 bucks for something i admire to have. I just hope it will be what ED states it will. Then i will happily cough up my money, but firstly i need to know its gonna get me glued to my computer as first FC did. Greeting to everyone who condemn people with less money to spend (i'm fortunately able to afford any new ED release so far ).

Read with understanding matey :joystick:

I'm just stating that increasing price of, what it is called, an add on, to level of twice the price of original game ( i know it is few years now ), will make some "not hard core" players, like myself to think twice before buying it. I know that some people will go for it whatever it cost, but ED suppose to make profit from this release, and addresing it just to few people will not bring them too much benefit. I'm not saying i wont buy it for 30 bucks, just stating that if it would be 15, i would not think, just get it. Price strategy is an important part of marketing. I'm a customer and i want to get as much as i can for as little as possible, so i condemn people going : just put whatever price on it, even 60 bucks!" For me its simple, if its worth it i pay, if not, though, im happy with 1.12 enough, for now.

I don't understand you people. ED goes: "it will be available early 2010 for 15 dolars". And everyone goes "yey" Than ED goes: "it will be out later and will be twice as much expensive". And people go "yey, yey" My true opinino as a customer: I'm not happy with that change. Its not like i can't afford it. I could, even if it was 130 dollars but it is not the point. People go: " Iwould get it even for 60 bucks". Well, ED wont make their money from few maniacs, product gotta sell a lot of copies to make reasonable profit. I bought basic LO in a shop for something like 5-7 dollars. Then i bought FC for some 15 bucks, but improvement was huge, so did'nt hesitate. If i'm to pay another 30 green ones, FC 2.0 its gotta be trully FC 2.0 not just FC 1.13 just called 2.0. What will happened, its a lot of people, including myself, will not buy it at start. I will wait for opinions to decide if its worth its price. To get more revenue ED should drop price to 15 bucks and sell 2-3, maybe 4 times more copies of it. I will wait... Hope i will have to eat my own words ;)

Pilot is great, but how about plane itself? Good job

Looks much better now, but if You went this far, why stop? Please take care of other elements that need improvement, as mentioned earlie pylons, and tail. Wings look pretty neat. Good job. Go for f-16 D block 52 ;)

Sorry, already said, NO.

Thats right. Considering ED stated it will be last update for LO i want it good, not neceseirly quick. Been waiting for it long enough to be sure that few weeks wont make much difference, as long as it will bring as much improvement as ED states.

You know, electronical stuff...

You keep making those bonuses... Looks great. Any pods planned?

Cant see belly from shot provided. I think AJ is also little bit shorter than JA. Hope to see little link in PM soon ;)

Interesting that ED presents two new 3d models as advanced WIP - F-16 and F-15, when they stated that FC2.0 will only get new su-25 model. Teasing, teasing, teasing.... ;)

It still have JA vertical tail. How is AJ going then? I could try this skin out, for any bugs... you know ;) Its beautiful, do You do it Yourself or have anyone on the books?

Yeah, it flies like a truck. Makes so much difference to LO A-10 witch is arcade really. Wish fast jets would have AFM. Gotta wait few years for DCS fast moving module. Su-25 uses so little fuel that it will be easier just to go full throttle and trying to slow it down while diving, than trying to maintain speed.

John X nobody knows when ED F-16 will be released. Not with FC 2.0 for sure and i'm doubtful it will happened with next DCS module so we are probably talking years, so my anwser is YES keep going mate. And if You make double seater version of late F-16s, like block 52 for Poland and Greece i would give You a big kiss ;)

Never touched it, and thats makes me think now. To make it more realistic, should i move it left or right? If there was never an option, it would'nt bring this thoughts to my confused brains ;) Get rid of it!

Fantastic teaser before AdA 2. Great job ;)

You are right just up to the moment when You go " There is nothing quite like a tech-battle BVR encounter turning into a high speed furball over a hostile battlefield to get the blood pounding". As You stated earlier "The perceived role of military aviation now is primarily CAS & precision strikes". So what we need its GBU dropping fast jet, more than anything else. For now i gotta "please myself" with MODs such as F-15E, F-16 and Gripen for LO:FC. Hope FC2.0 will give more possibilities for "community developement."

looks like a great battle. Fantastic stuff.

Out of what? See if Tomcatz model is more FPS friendly than 3go, as i never stated anything about stock model.

Exactly. Hom many combat helicopters are used by air forces? They're usualy used by army and cooperation on battle field with Air Forces is usualy limited to IFF identification, the most.

My laptop is doing well with all stock and third party models, no worries. Its Tomcatz idea to cut down polycount. I would like to see models as smooth as Tigrous gripen all the time ;)

I cant really imagine mixed heli/jet missions as they dont happen in real life eighter. Time jump idea is pointless as there are limitations of helis or a-10s such as low speed, witch every tactician planning an operation gotta take in consideration. Cant use time jump in real life so what would be the point of getting it in LO/DCS. These games aspiration is to be real simulators and trend is to get as realistic as possible. Thats main point of FC2.0 if i remember right. Big NO from me.

Point is as with other Tomcatz models, to reduce machine stress by dropping down polycount. 3go model is nice and smooth, and eats a lot of FPS. IMO most (99,99percent) machines can easily cope with this kind of models, especially as LOD was introduced. However Tomcatz is still trying to get as good as possible look, with as low poly count as possible. And being such kind person as he is, we can only thank him as we get his models for free ;) Wont be DL thi su anyway, as im not very interested in 3go model either. This plane just does'nt do it for me ;)