Jump to content

john_X

Members
  • Posts

    668
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by john_X

  1. Here: http://www.****************/files/file/2068-f-16-amluadf-final/ http://www.****************/files/file/1970-f-16a-adf-beta/ https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=77210 If you need more, i can give you wireframes, or dated "work in progress" screenshots, dated 3d max scenes or anything you need... What pisses me off is that someone publishes some modified work that doesn't belong to him, under his name(thing that already happened to me in the past with some skins i made for a mig-21 mod) . This practice i don't agree. The right thing to do is to ask the author for permission. Now i don't really mind that my mod gets updated for current version of DCS, but saying is VSN's is wrong and i don't allow that. The reason why i don't update it myself is that i have in my plans a more detailed and accurate project for the F-16, including a cockpit, started from scratch, much better than this old one. Regarding this mod you want to upgrade/update, i believe it doesn't worth the effort but if you insist i am going to be the author mentioned for the original mod(with the download link from above added). You can add your name near mine as the person who modified it and specify the modifications. Best thing to do is to show your modifications to me before you post them, if they are anything else than simply skins.
  2. this is my F-16, not VSN's. It is the one i made for FC2. All the private teams have it from me, for their own use, not for the public release or selling. I believe these conditions remain available for any other user who wants to release it(even for free) under their own names or other's. In fact, if this mod will be made public, it is going to be done under my name and my approval. But nobody asked me anything about this.
  3. what do you mean it didn't get ed license? maybe it'll get it anytime soon...
  4. i don't know what technique you use, but it seems there are too many polys here...
  5. @ OverStratos - it'll get the modification :smilewink:
  6. without trying to be subversive, if you ever want to rework the external model, for any of them, you can count on me.
  7. only Lancer C cockpit. My wish is the next one: MF(only exterior model), Lancer C(including cockpit), Bison(including cockpit, but this one is not a certainty yet).
  8. bulgarian MF, still wip
  9. Lancer version, mapping ...
  10. can you make a cockpit functional?
  11. Hi, does anyone have a functional an-24 or an-26, including cockpit to share? Thank you!
  12. I'm not aware of photogrammetry, isn't the result also a 3d model like the one based on scanning? Or are there differencies?
  13. You guys did this to use it as refference or to use it ingame? Because there are other methods of 3D scanning better than this one. This one based on photography is getting too much noise. Other methods are cleaner, i'll post 1 or 2 of them later...
  14. F-16A tail
  15. Thank you guys! :)
  16. slow working
  17. Thank you! Instead of using the composite map, is it possible to use the mix map?
  18. anyone?? nobody knows how the answer for my question from above?
  19. Hi, i am having a very big curiosity: Is it possible to add in the diffuse slot a mix of two maps? I want to add a painting map separately from the dirt map. What i mean is a two-textures material, both having different channels, like in the picture below:
  20. @Derbysieger - i really need this mod! Can you give some details please?
  21. @Derbysieger - what textures are those? They are incredible real !!!
  22. you can probably scan external model too for small jets... it provides you textures as well. In time it saves alot of money and hard work..
  23. NRG-Vampire, is that terrain the map of California?
  24. @NRG-Vampire, this water has deepness. I'd like to see that implemented in DCS. What terrain is that?
  25. @Blaze - cockpit glass is very realistic, is it real or photoshoped?
×
×
  • Create New...