Omega Oska

If you look at the down right corner you see that I have used 348K out of 964K, and the fact is ...I should have 768MB RAM. I have been experiencing very unstable usage, even just browsing with IE, not to mention gaming....someone has an experience like this?

I have no comments on nor knowledge about missile behaviour in RL. But I do think slightly decreasing the missiles' effectiveness increases the fun factor since it encourages players to make wise shots rather than spamming missiles.

Beautiful videos. OT: LOMAC really needs some work on its cloud and fog settings, they just look like toys floating in the air.

oh... so I have no choic but to stick to the World Cup for these two weeks...

Thanks, so I guess the screenshot posted by Acgaen is too small so I couldn't see clearly, it looks much better now. Thoug I would be happierif they can model some of the panel lines onto the model instead of just skinning it. Since I suppose flying a civilian jet would consume much less computation power, I think more resources could be used on the eye candy.

This is a great idea. But...I dunno if it's the problem of the skin or what...it doesn't look so good. Can we have a shot on the clay model (without skin)?

If they can get all that flight model, avionics stuff right, then I suppose it's worth the long wait. But I would like to add a point that maybe a year or two later the graphics tech could have advanced much, the models and terrain that they are showing now could be outdated.

I used to check the site http://www.fighterops.com/ pretty often, but looks like it's been dead for about a year. Any one knows a thing about it? I have high hopes on the sim...well..I did.

You are the man, TT.

I do agree that flight sim graphic needs to be improved, but I don't find armedassault anything special, maybe it's because my screen is too low rez so I can't see the deatils. It seems that everyone is talking about next gen graphics ever since we knew about XBox360 and PS3, I am really looking forward to a serious combat flight sim (not arcade) which can utilize such technologies. (The next title of Microsof flight sim looks promising, but hey, it's not a combat flight sim)

Finally watched the film, it's a good one. For those who have seen it, I would like to ask if that 3D imaging system seen on the AWACS is real or not? I would be very impressed if they can do that. (sorry but I couldn't find a screenshot of that) http://www.fighterpilotfilm.com/

there were two main problems that are troubling me: 1. the crazily drifting mouse 2. being unable to set up the "win" button But I still have to wait for some time before I can tru out the new drivers, so any review from the community is welcome.

It seems that they are finally doing something. http://www.saitekforum.com/showthread.php?t=8486

I think it would be cool if someone simply develop a visor with hight rezolution, and let trackir do the headtracking. This could keep the whole set at a lower cost. Although the 3d visor looks cool, I don't think the price is reasonable.

http://www.emagin.com/html/consumer_products_product.htm have anyone ever tried it with any flight simulator?

Nice job, bug2!!

I have left the community for quite some time. Now I remember that Strikemax was working on a high poly model of Su-27. Anyone knows how is it going?

OT but just want to share this on my best favorite forum.This is going to be my first model. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v307/OmegaOska/stridenttheshadowfront5.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v307/OmegaOska/stridenttheshadowfront4.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v307/OmegaOska/shot1.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v307/OmegaOska/shot2.jpg I am having a hard time undestanding this 3dmax stuff, and I wonder if I ever will. I am looking forward to see if the finished model can be used to replace a tank or maybe a RPG carrying guy, just for fun. Any advice or resources for newbies are appreciated.

I remember I once downloaded a video demonstrating modelling a M-4 assault rifle, using 3dsMax6. Can't remember if I found it in this forum? Anyone have a clue?

Nicely done!! Been away from LOMAC for about a month, and your work is bringing me back!! I have just installed 3dsmax7 on my PC, but it's VERY slow. My spec is GeForceMX400, is this the problem?

Thanks for the link.

Very nice movie indeed, would be great if he use guns instead of missile. Orao, I cannot agree with you. If they don't make the F-22, we won't have a F-22 sim in the future.:P

Does anybody know some active Quake III forums? I played the game some years ago, but stopped ever since I started my flight simming hobby. But since I saw some news on an upcoming Quake IV to the series, it reminds me of the old love.

As the AIM-54 close in, the RWR shows a steadily increasing signal power, barrel roll around its axis ~5 secs before it reaches full power. Works almost every time. But to add more realism, I prefer doing the F-pole+beaming approach. But the idea is the same, use the RWR to estimate the time of impact.

I wonder if europe or the eastern world has the similar ROEs. If yes, then I suppose it's not too big a problem. Are the rules somehow being consulted with the UN of something?