hein22

Still unrealistic ICLS? A super module must have this system correctly modeled.

ED: this system cannot be in this state for a super module. Any news?

Any plans to get this done guys? I'm starting to get frustrated after paying so much for the module considering this is not a bug but a lack of simulation.

Thanks for the update. I'll continue to watch this closely and report back if I find something odd so we can see if it needs a tweak.

What I'm seeing is much much more than 50ft. And if 50ft is what you see, then your statement comes down, because 50ft will give you fire and forget capabilities.

So the bug you mentioned was fixed but got broken again, confirmed by BN.

Correct as is. So the GPS is useless then? Come on ED. Can you at least write something here so we can learn if this is not a bug? It's quite rude to tag without saying anything.

Any word from ED? Bug is: if launched from more than aprox 10nm accuracy is perfect, if launched from more than that accuracy is very reduced.

But it's not a matter of reproducing the issue, that's easy, just install the game and play and everyone will see the FLIR is wrong.

Thanks Ramsay. Sounds like a very basic and solvable bug. Hope ED can raise to the occasion.

I didn't catch the procedure to get it to work properly. Can you expand? Thanks

Ok, the bug you refer to appears to be broken again... But it's definitely not related to this one. This bug I created months ago was about the MAV F not matching the TGT point in 3D space.

Guys, this issue is still present and kills the nature of LTWS.

This issue is worse than before. Now the midcourse guidance shuts off and comes back on every time I switch L&S and DT2 back and forth. Track attached, very easy to reproduce. ltws midcourse DT2 no notch2.trk

I'm sure why ED marks things as fixed but I hope I can help by letting you know that this issue is still present. Attached a track, plane starts popping chaff as soon as I fire. tws launch warning4.trk

Yes, NATOPS has that as well and if very useful. But this time I did want to get more in deph.

Issue is still present in current OB.

It doesn't have inverter. But yeah, the picture in NATOPS wasn't very clear IMO.

Issue is still present in current OB.

Issue is still present in current OB

Bump

That's the case! NATOPS shows the DC buses powered by the U battery. But your question made me look a bit deeper and it seems that there are two DC buses that the battery doesn't power, so there lays the answer I think. Thanks Rain.

No, that bug was fixed months ago and it is still fixed. Here we have a miss match between TGP and MAV F LOS. So the seeker head does not reach its final destination, it wont lock on anything either.

No, I know how electrical systems work on airplanes. You need to understand that some systems cannot work on AC, like MC, DDI, INS, GPS, etc. So the question is not how power is converted in life but how the hornet manages to have those systems working if the generators power, of course, the AC buses. The DC buses that appear on NATOPS are all powered by battery (when GENs are off) and battery won't energize any of the systems I mentioned above (in DCS at least).

Hi rain! Maybe I keep messing my posts up, I wasn't talking about that at all, sorry. My question was how does the system provide the needed DC power for the system that require DC (like MC, DDI, INS, GPS, etc) if the generators are only providing AC power. Remember that these systems cannot work with AC; And the DC buses that appear on NATOPS are all powered by battery and battery won't energize any of the systems I mentioned above. Did I make it more clear now?