Search the Community
Showing results for tags '4090'.
-
Just starting a thread to post my results. Old Build: 5900x Water Cooled (liquid arctic cooler) Asus Hero MB w/ 64GB DDR4 3090 (not liquid cooled) 2 x 2TB Gen 3 NVME EVGA 1200 watt PSU New Build: AMD 7900x3D Water Cooled (Arctic liquid 360mm rad) Asus ROG Crosshair X670E Hero 64GB DC DDR5 6400 Ram MSI Suprim RTX 4090 Liquid X (Liquid Cooled) 4TB Gen 4 NVME (Kingston Fury) 2x2TB Gen 3 NVME Corsair HX1500i PSU NZXT H7 Flow I'll do some tests on the old system and post a screenshot of my settings so I can attempt a similar setup in the new system. All results are in VR on the HP G2 Reverb (Gen 1) Just waiting on the arctic liquid cooler before I can start my build, will run older system tests in the meantime. Not attempting a perfect scientific method comparison but will be as thorough as I have the patience to be to offer the community some semblance of comparison. For context, my 3090 build is severely CPU bound which is why I didn't attempt to get a 4090 for it. Most of the time the 3090 is not over 89% usage and many times is in the 60% usage area while the CPU is full tilt (20% OC'd) Not sure if the 7900x3D was the perfect buy over the 7950 but we'll see. Initial results show the two of them almost head to head, less than 1% difference (7950 edging it by a bit) but no DCS tests I've seen. The reason for the 7900x3D over the 7950x3D is the higher base clock speeds which should result in better single core performance and because its a 6+6 chiplet design over an 8+8 design there should be some extra headroom (in regards to heat) in the 6 chip design to squeeze more Over Clocking out of it as the 8 chip design will generate more heat and DCS won't use them anyway. Is my thinking correct on this, who knows, we'll find out soon enough. In the 5900x vs 5950x (I've run both) the 5900x was faster in my builds. Same was true in the 3900x generation. Either way, the difference would probably be insignificant. The real gains for me will be the extra CPU headroom over the 5900x for more draw calls to the 4090 which I'm hoping I can take much more advantage of than the 5900x did with the 3090. Excited to build this, but not sure when I'll be able to get around to it. Too many projects on the go and this build requires me to build 4 pcs essentially as I have a rotation of parts as I build new machines. (my old machine some parts to my son, and my sons old machine 3900x back to me for the office and my office machine back to one of my daughters etc.. etc..) I love upgrade time, but it will be busy on the workbench for a bit. Some parts sleeping under my desk until the cooler arrives.null
-
I have done several performance tests of my newest hardware and compared them with each other. I have used DCS World 2.8.3.38090 Open Beta with Single Thread ST and Multiple Threads MT with an Instant Mission: AH-64D, map "Marianas" - Battle for Saipan: Dawn Invasion" After starting the mission, I have pressed OK, then [Right-STRG + Break/Pause] for two times (for displaying the frame rate) and then I have pressed the space bar. Directly after that I have checked the frame rate. I know that my graphic settings are very hard.....: null All CPUs as well as GPUs are slightly overclocked, except the CPU Intel I5-13500. Here are the results, including the fps / framerates in DCS World with ST and MT: Here as a table: 4K performance comparison between four of my computers Type Description CPU GPU RAM DCS World Battle for Saipan – Dawn Invasion Time Spy Time Spy Extreme Port Royal ST MT Total Graphics Score CPU Score PC Self build Intel i7-12700KF (12 Cores, 25MB Cache) RTX 4090 24GB GDDR6X 64 DDR5-6000 84 98 („GPU-Bound“) 31977 37570 17394 16227 27128 PC Self build Intel i5-13500 (14 Cores, 24 MB Cache) RTX 3080 LHR 10GB GDDR6 32 DDR5-4800 48 58 („GPU-Bound“) 17325 17624 15810 8406 11529 PC Self build Intel i7-2600k @ 4.5 Ghz (4 Cores, 8MB Cache) RTX 2080 Ti 11GB GDDR6 16 DDR3-1600 21 38 (fast changes between „CPU-“ and „GPU-bound“) 9996 14096 3775 4506 8941 Notebook Alienware 17 R5 Intel i7-8750H (6 Cores, 8MB Cache, up to 3.9GHz with Turbo Boost) GTX 1070 OC 8GB GDDR5 32 DDR4-2666 6 7 („GPU-Bound“) 4404 4459 4118 1815 1030
-
- 6
-
- multithread
- hardware
- (and 16 more)