Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

While I misquoted or mis-stated that QFE is the Altitude above sea level of the Runway, I beg to differ with you Effte.

QFE ...is the Atmospheric pressure at aerodrome elevation (or at runway threshold)

QFE allows us to read height above the runway.

 

In fact, if you will simply refer to the handy links I provided in Post #17, all the mentioned Q Codes are defined and explained in detail.

The last link tells why these different standards can be confusing and solutions some ATC's and Pilots use to reduce of not eliminate confusion.

SnowTiger
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - Zen 4 16-Core 4.5 GHz - Socket AM5 - 170W Desktop Processor
ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI 6E Socket AM5 (LGA 1718) Ryzen 7000 gaming motherboard
Geforce RTX 4090 Gaming Trio X -  24GB GDDR6X + META Quest 3 + Controllers + Warthog Throttle, CH Pro Pedals, VKB Gunfighter MKII MCG Pro
G.SKILL Trident Z5 Neo Series 64 GB RAM (2 x 32GB) 288-Pin PC RAM DDR5 6000 RAM

Posted

 

QFE

 

.

 

No offence taken : ) We take QFE as the highest point of the runway not necessarily the threshold.

InWin S Frame with Asus Z170 | i7-6700K @ 4.5 Water Cooled CPU and Graphics | 16GB DDR4 | GTX1070 | 240GB M.2 SSD | Warthog Hotas | MFG Crosswind | 40" Samsung 4K | CV1 | Replica MB Mk10 Ejection Seat with Gametrix 908

Posted
I beg to differ with you Effte.

QFE ...is the Atmospheric pressure at aerodrome elevation (or at runway threshold)

QFE allows us to read height above the runway.

 

In fact, if you will simply refer to the handy links

 

Exactly which are the facts you contend?

 

It's not me you are disagreeing with, but rather ICAO. The only way you can effectively disagree with ICAO is to live in an exotic place like N Korea or to have your country's regulatory authority file a point of non-compliance in your national regs. ICAO write The Book. While everything you can find on the net is generally true and factually correct, I'd go with the ICAO definition in this case.

Posted
No offence taken : ) We take QFE as the highest point of the runway not necessarily the threshold.

Same here. Unless "we" means "me and my good chums here at the offices in Montreal" it's not something "we" are free to define. If you do work in Montreal, you should be updating your publications to contain that definition rather than spend your time posting in forums... ;)

Posted

I had an incident last night where I requested taxi to runway, I was authorized to taxi to runway 14, when I got there, I requested takeoff, I was authorized to do so, then as I was about halfway down I seen an F15 taxiing out on the opposite end. he obviously did not have his radio on and had no idea someone was taking off, and he was not even taking off from in the correct direction, fortunately I was able to get wheels up prior to impact.

 

Then I heard someone ask about the radio on teamspeak, and someone said dont bother, no one uses it,,, I disagree. Once airborne I turn it off until I RTB

Windows 10 Pro - 64 Bit / ASUS ROG Strix B650E-F Gaming / AMD 7800X3D / G.Skill Trident Z5 NEO 64GB DDR5 6000 Ram / SSD M.2 SK hynix Platinum P41 2TB / MSI Gaming GeForce RTX 4090 SUPRIM Liquid X 24G / SteelSeries Arctis 7 Headset /LG-Ultragear 38" IPS LED Ultrawide HD Monitor (3840 x 1600) / Track IR4 / Thrustmaster TPR Pendular Rudder Pedals / Virpil HOTAS VPC Constellation ALPHA-R & VPC MongoosT-50CM3 Throttle

 

Posted
Finally, there's standard pressure - QNE (not officially defined in ICAO Doc 8400) - which gives you your uncorrected pressure altitude, independent of any geographical location. This is nice when separating traffic by altitude

 

Just to be picky since you picked other guys up ;) - but back when I was a trainee controller we were taught of this mysterious QNE and, of course, have never needed it since...

 

QNE is the altimeter reading when you are on the airfield with altimeter set to 1013/29.92 depending on your IQ ;)

 

Standard Pressure Setting (SPS) is a better title for the definition you gave... Or in laymans terms we use Pressure Altitude or Flight Levels (for separation by altitude)

 

I believe QNE is mostly used in high elevation airfields where your sub scale cannot wind off low enough for the QFE or if you're unfortunate enough to have your altimeter frozen on 1013 on arrival at destination - not that this is relevant at all to the OPs question but that's what happens when someone mentions Q codes

Posted (edited)
QNE is the altimeter reading when you are on the airfield with altimeter set to 1013/29.92 depending on your IQ ;)

 

Standard Pressure Setting (SPS) is a better title for the definition you gave... Or in laymans terms we use Pressure Altitude or Flight Levels (for separation by altitude)

 

Ah, so I should have written something along the lines of:

 

Finally, there's standard pressure - QNE (not officially defined in ICAO Doc 8400) - which gives you your uncorrected pressure altitude, independent of any geographical location. This is nice when separating traffic by altitude.

 

(My boldface.)

 

Gee, I wish I would have thought of that. ;)

 

I believe QNE is mostly used in high elevation airfields where your sub scale cannot wind off low enough for the QFE or if you're unfortunate enough to have your altimeter frozen on 1013 on arrival at destination

 

I do not believe it is ever used for that. If you can't go to QFE when manoeuvering for takeoff/landing, you'd use QNH instead. Using flight levels would mean constantly having to apply a correction to your altimeter reading in order to know your altitude over the ground.

 

If the altimeter is frozen, it is broken. I'd use the backup, present even in most spam cans. :)

 

Cheers,

/Fred

Edited by effte
Posted

Yes you are quite right for using the QNH in that example. 1:30AM isnt the best time for thinking straight

 

Anyway - to try explaining again - the QNE is not a pressure setting it is a figure in ft which gives the airfield elevation above 1013 on the subscale. It is used where you cannot wind off the altimeter low enough in extreme low pressures (Not QFE

Posted
btw 300 means 30.000ft

Im guessin the sky is cleared so that you can keep climbing up to this alt without hitting trafic..? Dont think it means that you have to climb to 30.000ft.

 

Edit: This is just how I understand it from watching youtube videos, reading etc etc.. Please correct me if Im wrong!

 

No, If the ATC meant 30 000 feet it would say "flight level 300".

The ATC in this game is Russian no matter what side you are playing on or what language the ATC actually is talking in. In Russian aviation they use the metric system so when the tower says 300, it means 300 meters (about 1000 feet).

 

Basically, The tower is instructing you to continue on the runways heading until you've reached an altitude of 300 meters QFE (1000 feet above the ground) and then continue on your own navigation.

Posted

@Warthog,

sorry, you can't have an elevation in ft above a Kohlsmann (altimeter subscale) setting of 1013 hPa. For subtraction to work, both terms have to be of the same unit. The hair has now officially been split. ;)

 

I see what you mean though, and you have the right idea.

 

QNE: "What indication will my altimeter give on landing at...(place) at...hours, my subscale being set to 1013.2 millibars (29.925 inches)?"

 

The code QNE is not, however, officially defined in international aviation, unlike QNH and QFE. The Q codes were established to simplify comms with morse code way back and that one hasn't made it into the standards of today.

 

If your altimeter can't cope with the current atmospheric pressure, you don't have an altimeter and are not legal to fly if it is require equipment. It has happened, and aircraft have been grounded... but only due to high pressure, while I've been around.

 

That's a story in itself. The fast jet boys were stuck on the ground but I went flying, as my altimeter had a wider range. In addition, it was one of the coldest days of the year at a high latitude, so the density altitude was way - way - below sea level. Alone and without filling the tanks to the brim I got impressive performance out of the old kite. :)

 

Cheers,

/Fred

Posted

Only thing I hope is that we'll get US ATC with Imperial system with Nevada

Do you think that getting 9 women pregnant will get you a baby in 1 month?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Mobo: Asus P8P67 deluxe Monitor: Lg 22'' 1920*1080

CPU: i7 2600k@ 4.8Ghz +Zalman CNPS9900 max

Keyboard: Logitech G15

GPU:GTX 980 Strix Mouse: Sidewinder X8

PSU: Corsair TX750w Gaming Devices: Saytek X52, TrackIr5

RAM: Mushkin 2x4gb ddr3 9-9-9-24 @1600mhz

Case: 690 SSD: Intel X25m 80gb

 

Posted

If you want to fly with RL ATC, there are servers out there that have 'm.

 

132 virtualwing is one of them, I do ATC/AWACS there :)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Commodore 64 | MOS6510 | VIC-II | SID6581 | DD 1541 | KCS Power Cartridge | 64Kb | 32Kb external | Arcade Turbo

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...