Igor4U Posted September 9, 2014 Posted September 9, 2014 (edited) I was just trying to narrow down which F-86F we are enjoying here. Looking at our F-86F, I don't see any leading edge Slats, and I would assume that we're not Nuclear capable, so we're probably looking at an earlier Block Production Run (Korean war era). *** Leading Edge Slats (reduce landing speeds, unknow if they were also "Maneuvering Slats" for ACM enhancement ?) F-86 Leading Edge Slats http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=129670 North American F-86 Sabre http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_F-86_Sabre F-86F Model-Blocks: The F-86 Sabre incorporated the F-86E's "All-Flying-Tail"; I'm guessing this was to overcome high speed pitch control problems of earlier model F-86s (equiped with more conventional "elevator" style empenage) which may have had trouble with Mach Tuck at transonic speeds. Stabilator http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stabilator Tailplane http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tailplane Mach Tuck http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach_tuck Uprated engine and larger "6–3" wing without leading edge slats, 2,239 built... Sabre Fs had much improved high-speed agility, coupled with a higher landing speed of over 145 mph (233 km/h). North American model(s): NA-172 (F-86F-1 through F-15 blocks), NA-176 (F-86F-20 and -25 blocks), NA-191 (F-86F-30 and -35 blocks), NA-193 (F-86F-26 block), The F-35 block had provisions for a new task: the nuclear tactical attack with one of the new small "nukes" ("second generation" nuclear ordnance). NA-202 (F-86F-35 block), The F-40 had a new slatted wing, with a slight decrease of speed, but also a much better agility at high and low speed with a landing speed reduced to 124 mph (200 km/h). The USAF upgraded many of previous F versions to the F-40 standard. NA-227 (first two orders of F-86F-40 blocks comprising 280 aircraft which reverted to leading edge wing slats of an improved design), NA-231 (70 in third F-40 block order), NA-238 (110 in fourth F-40 block order), and NA-256 (120 in final F-40 block order); 300 additional airframes in this series assembled by Mitsubishi in Japan for Japanese Air Self-Defense Force. Edited September 11, 2014 by Igor4U Cross Reference Thread
mjmorrow Posted September 9, 2014 Posted September 9, 2014 I believe that we are using a F-86F- 35 Block, that is in fact nuke capable, though I am pretty sure we do not use nukes in DCS World, at least yet. I will have to have the community verify whether I am right or wrong on these accounts, as I don't have time to double check myself, right now. :thumbup: [sIGPIC]http://i688.photobucket.com/albums/vv250/mjmorrow76/SPAD%20of%20a%20new%20generation_zpshcbftpce.png[/sIGPIC]
SkateZilla Posted September 9, 2014 Posted September 9, 2014 F-86F-35. Nukes are currently not modeled in DCS. Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2), ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9) 3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs
Art-J Posted September 9, 2014 Posted September 9, 2014 I got an impression it was announced even before release we were getting an F-35 (and it's clearly written in F-86 info section DCS site) so there's not much to "narrow down" :D, maybe with exception of details of systems modelling... these however will evolve with further development of this beta module. i7 9700K @ stock speed, single GTX1070, 32 gigs of RAM, TH Warthog, MFG Crosswind, Win10.
Igor4U Posted September 10, 2014 Author Posted September 10, 2014 Thank Gentlemen ! Copy all - Block 35 Sabre it is !
Revan Posted September 10, 2014 Posted September 10, 2014 F-86F-35. Nukes are currently not modeled in DCS. umm, what about the 2 nukes that the MiG-21 has? DCS: F-4E really needs to be a thing!!!!!! Aircraft: A-10C, Ka-50, UH-1H, MiG-21, F-15C, Su-27, MiG-29, A-10A, Su-25, Su-25T, TF-51
Recommended Posts