Angel101 Posted May 11, 2016 Posted May 11, 2016 External model not showing properly: Also I´m unable to make it track any laser. Suggestion: Maybe you can change that bomb from loadout for the GBU-27 I don´t know if this one is going to work with a Laser, but at least seems better.
Rlaxoxo Posted May 11, 2016 Posted May 11, 2016 Pretty sure these textures are defined by ED and since no aircraft use these there wasnt really any effort put into this. Mirage then just loads these weapons from the game but i could be wrong We've ween ED retexturing missiles and bombs and rocket racks lately so I'm guessing they're working on this [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Youtube Reddit
Angel101 Posted May 11, 2016 Author Posted May 11, 2016 The problem is that now we don´t have any 1.000Kg LGB working, and it will be great to have one to destroy buildings and bridges that other planes can´t destroy or they need lots of amunitions.
Zeus67 Posted May 11, 2016 Posted May 11, 2016 The problem is that now we don´t have any 1.000Kg LGB working, and it will be great to have one to destroy buildings and bridges that other planes can´t destroy or they need lots of amunitions. Unfortunately the M-2000C RDI is not rated to carry bombs larger than 500Kgs. "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." "The three most dangerous things in the world are a programmer with a soldering iron, a hardware type with a program patch and a user with an idea."
Angel101 Posted May 11, 2016 Author Posted May 11, 2016 whoops! then allow to carry the GBU-24 it´s also wrong, isn´t it?
ZHeN Posted May 11, 2016 Posted May 11, 2016 would be cool if they allowed 2xGBU-12's on AUF-2's on wing pylons instead of this useless GBU-24! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Zeus67 Posted May 11, 2016 Posted May 11, 2016 Please stop with the PMs. I acknowledge that I was wrong. The GBU-24 is a MK-84 (2000 pounds - 984 Kg) with guidance package. So, yes. The M-2000C RDI can carry 1000 Kg bombs in the centerline pylon. "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." "The three most dangerous things in the world are a programmer with a soldering iron, a hardware type with a program patch and a user with an idea."
Azrayen Posted May 11, 2016 Posted May 11, 2016 would be cool if they allowed 2xGBU-12's on AUF-2's on wing pylons instead of this useless GBU-24! Under the wings it would be "dumb" bombs, not GBUs. ;) And the 24 is not useless AFAIK.
ZHeN Posted May 11, 2016 Posted May 11, 2016 Under the wings it would be "dumb" bombs, not GBUs. ;) but why ? those are "smart" pylons :) they can launch '530s! And the 24 is not useless AFAIK. at it's current state in DCS, it is [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Azrayen Posted May 11, 2016 Posted May 11, 2016 but why ? those are "smart" pylons :) they can launch '530s! I don't know why. I note those are not the same pylons, just the same place under the wing ;) at it's current state in DCS, it is OK, didn't test it.
jojo Posted May 11, 2016 Posted May 11, 2016 would be cool if they allowed 2xGBU-12's on AUF-2's on wing pylons instead of this useless GBU-24! IRL twin GBU-12 on wing pylon would conflict with landing gear. Mirage fanatic ! I7-7700K/ MSI RTX3080/ RAM 64 Go/ SSD / TM Hornet stick-Virpil WarBRD + Virpil CM3 Throttle + MFG Crosswind + Reverb G2. Flickr gallery: https://www.flickr.com/gp/71068385@N02/728Hbi
jojo Posted May 11, 2016 Posted May 11, 2016 but why ? those are "smart" pylons :) they can launch '530s! The thing is it's supposed to be a simulation and reflect the real aircraft capacities and payload. So GBU capacity came late in M-2000C life, and in current world, AG missions need a lot of fuel. CAS (GBU-12) need playtime, so 2 wing tanks. GBU-24 are used for hardened target, so often far range = 2 wing tanks. In the end, load out configuration test are expensive, so FAF don't certify load out they won't use, even if it's technically possible. What is planned by Razbam is realistic. Mirage fanatic ! I7-7700K/ MSI RTX3080/ RAM 64 Go/ SSD / TM Hornet stick-Virpil WarBRD + Virpil CM3 Throttle + MFG Crosswind + Reverb G2. Flickr gallery: https://www.flickr.com/gp/71068385@N02/728Hbi
tombeckett2285 Posted May 11, 2016 Posted May 11, 2016 Theoretically, Laser guided bombs can be dropped from any aircraft capable of dropping unguided ordnance, airframe interference and flight test clearance notwithstanding. The Paveway kit is entirely self contained and requires no electrical or avionics interface with the carrying aircraft. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk "The only replacement for a Buccaneer is a Buccaneer".
ZHeN Posted May 11, 2016 Posted May 11, 2016 Theoretically, Laser guided bombs can be dropped from any aircraft capable of dropping unguided ordnance, airframe interference and flight test clearance notwithstanding. The Paveway kit is entirely self contained and requires no electrical or avionics interface with the carrying aircraft. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk dunno why, but after I've read your message, I imagined two guys in a biplane dropping GBU-12 manually ... [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Angel101 Posted May 11, 2016 Author Posted May 11, 2016 Ok, then If is correct to carry a GBU-24 but actually doesn´t work and also have an horrible model, what is the better and faster solution? Can Razbam change the loadout for the GBU-27? or I report that in the "DCS World » 1.5 Open Beta Bugs and Problems »Object Errors" and pray for ED to fix that bug in two weeks??
Glimmer Posted August 24, 2018 Posted August 24, 2018 (edited) GBU-24 won't be repair? Right? :( Edited August 24, 2018 by Glimmer Су-27 Flanker | Су-30 Flanker-C | Су-33 Flanker-D | Су-34 Fullback | Су-24 Fencer | МиГ-29 Fulcrum | F-14A/B/D Tomcat | F/A-18C/D Hornet | F/A-18E/F Super Hornet | F-16C Fighting Falcon | F-15C Eagle | Eurofighter Typhoon | Tornado IDS | JAS-39 Gripen | AJ/JA(S)-37 Viggen | Rafale | M-2000 Mirage | Mirage F1 Ka-52 Hokum | Mi-28N Havoc | Mi-35M Hind | Mi-24P Hind | AH-64D Apache | AH-1W SuperCobra
Silver_Dragon Posted August 24, 2018 Posted August 24, 2018 If by "repair" has a new 3D model, that need ED build them. For Work/Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / MDF
Glimmer Posted August 24, 2018 Posted August 24, 2018 If by "repair" has a new 3D model, that need ED build them. Its seeker doesn't find any laser. Су-27 Flanker | Су-30 Flanker-C | Су-33 Flanker-D | Су-34 Fullback | Су-24 Fencer | МиГ-29 Fulcrum | F-14A/B/D Tomcat | F/A-18C/D Hornet | F/A-18E/F Super Hornet | F-16C Fighting Falcon | F-15C Eagle | Eurofighter Typhoon | Tornado IDS | JAS-39 Gripen | AJ/JA(S)-37 Viggen | Rafale | M-2000 Mirage | Mirage F1 Ka-52 Hokum | Mi-28N Havoc | Mi-35M Hind | Mi-24P Hind | AH-64D Apache | AH-1W SuperCobra
Britchot Posted August 27, 2018 Posted August 27, 2018 Its seeker doesn't find any laser. Are you releasing the weapon while in a 25°+/- dive? Please take a look at this thread for what I once thought was a bug: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=208695&highlight=gbu [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] CPU - Intel 8088 @ 4.77 MHz; Memory - 128KB; 360KB double-sided 5 1/4" full-height floppy disk drive; 10MB Seagate ST-412 hard drive JG-1 MiG-21bis Checklist
catt42 Posted September 9, 2018 Posted September 9, 2018 (edited) Are you releasing the weapon while in a 25°+/- dive? Please take a look at this thread for what I once thought was a bug: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=208695&highlight=gbu The GBU-24 won't track anyway. The in-game Mirage is fully capable of level-flight or toss bombing, all you have to do is designate a point in front of the actual target, because all LGBs tend to glide a lot. If you accurately designate the target position, the bomb could glide past it without picking up the laser. Depending on your release altitude and speed, you can designate 3nm in front of the target and still hit it, probably not super-realistic, but it works. If you want to use the gbu-24 with the Mirage, paste this code at the end of the \DCS World OpenBeta\Scripts\Database\Weapons\bombs_table.lua file (before 'end'): declare_paveway_2("GBU_24", _("GBU-24"), "GBU-24", wsType_Bomb_Guided, "bomb-paveway-II-afm", { fm = { mass = 1050.0, caliber = 0.457000, cx_coeff = {1.000000, 0.390000, 0.60000, 0.1680000, 1.310000}, L = 4.368, wind_sigma = windCoeff * 220.0, Sw = 2 * 1.75 * math.pow(24 * 2.45 * 0.01 / math.sin(2 * math.pi / 6), 2) / 2.5, A = 0.6, maxAoa = math.rad(7), finsTau = 0.1 }, bang_bang_autopilot = { omegaDumpingK = 0.30 }, warhead = warheads["Mk_84"], }, { char_time = 20.34 }, "wAmmunitionLaserHoming" ); Or, if you want to use a GBU-24 with BLU-109 penetration bomb for hardened targets, paste this code declare_paveway_2("GBU_24", _("GBU-24"), "GBU-24", wsType_Bomb_Guided, "bomb-paveway-II-afm", { fm = { mass = 944.0, caliber = 0.457000, cx_coeff = {1.000000, 0.390000, 0.60000, 0.1680000, 1.310000}, L = 4.368, wind_sigma = windCoeff * 220.0, Sw = 2 * 1.75 * math.pow(24 * 2.45 * 0.01 / math.sin(2 * math.pi / 6), 2) / 2.5, A = 0.6, maxAoa = math.rad(7), finsTau = 0.1 }, bang_bang_autopilot = { omegaDumpingK = 0.30 }, warhead = warheads["BLU_109"], }, { char_time = 20.34 }, "wAmmunitionLaserHoming" ); The GBU-24 is not already present in the file, I guess this is why it won't work. I wrote the code using info from GBU-16, GBU-10 and MK-84 in bombs_table.lua, plus some open source info on the mass (which are probably not accurate). Edited September 9, 2018 by catt42
Recommended Posts