whaaw Posted May 12, 2017 Posted May 12, 2017 im using a simple joystick as a Radarstick when i bind the axis to the stick i noticed that either the Radar screen or the RB75 controlls are inverted in the vertikal axis. Horizontal is fine. so it doesent matter if the axis is inverted or not in the settings, one of them will always be inverted. SFMBE
Home Fries Posted May 12, 2017 Posted May 12, 2017 Concur. I was under the impression this was fixed i the first Viggen update, but it appears to be back. -Home Fries My DCS Files and Skins My DCS TARGET Profile for Cougar or Warthog and MFDs F-14B LANTIRN Guide
Dave62ndFF Posted September 10, 2021 Posted September 10, 2021 I have recently found this is still a problem. When buttons are used for the Radarstick vertical axis the radar cursor or EP13 sight respond in the same direction. However if the Radarstick is bound to an axis, the vertical response is reversed between the radar & EP13 sight. The horizontal axis works fine.
LazyBoot Posted September 10, 2021 Posted September 10, 2021 SPA mode is also inverted relative to the normal radar fix mode (or possibly the radar fix mode is inverted relative to everything else)
Bagpipe Posted September 18, 2021 Posted September 18, 2021 is there evidence somewhere to show that this is indeed incorrect? I mean it could function this way irl maybe?
LazyBoot Posted September 19, 2021 Posted September 19, 2021 10 hours ago, Bagpipe said: is there evidence somewhere to show that this is indeed incorrect? I mean it could function this way irl maybe? If it is this way IRL I'd like evidence of that. Because I find it unlikely that it's push up to move the cursor up while in nav/anf and then push down to move the cursor up while in spa (or vice versa)
Bagpipe Posted September 19, 2021 Posted September 19, 2021 3 hours ago, LazyBoot said: If it is this way IRL I'd like evidence of that. Because I find it unlikely that it's push up to move the cursor up while in nav/anf and then push down to move the cursor up while in spa (or vice versa) I agree, evidence of either would be grand
IronMike Posted September 20, 2021 Posted September 20, 2021 I highly doubt that this would be correct irl. I am adding it to our tracker. Thank you for your reports! 1 Heatblur Simulations Please feel free to contact me anytime, either via PM here, on the forums, or via email through the contact form on our homepage. http://www.heatblur.com/ https://www.facebook.com/heatblur/
Machalot Posted September 20, 2021 Posted September 20, 2021 15 minutes ago, IronMike said: I highly doubt that this would be correct irl. I am adding it to our tracker. Thank you for your reports! @IronMikeThese short little acknowledgements go a really long way to make us feel heard! 2 "Subsonic is below Mach 1, supersonic is up to Mach 5. Above Mach 5 is hypersonic. And reentry from space, well, that's like Mach a lot."
IronMike Posted September 20, 2021 Posted September 20, 2021 Just now, Machalot said: @IronMikeThese short little acknowledgements go a really long way to make us feel heard! Glad to hear. I will not always be able to give you guys the top attention you deserve, but I feel really bad how neglected you all felt, also due to my absence here. I will continue to do my best to let you know: we do hear you, and you do matter to us, more than you all can imagine. 1 Heatblur Simulations Please feel free to contact me anytime, either via PM here, on the forums, or via email through the contact form on our homepage. http://www.heatblur.com/ https://www.facebook.com/heatblur/
Recommended Posts