Nero.ger Posted December 26, 2018 Posted December 26, 2018 as Topic, but to my knowledge the Aim9m is an all aspect missle. 'controlling' the Ka50 feels like a discussion with the Autopilot and trim system about the flight direction.
Rex854Warrior Posted December 29, 2018 Posted December 29, 2018 (edited) Same thing with the Magic II, also I see the Magic being used is the ED version of that missile which is horrible compared to the more realistic Magic II being used on the M-2000C, could AvioDev get in touch with Razbam ? Edited December 29, 2018 by Rex854Warrior [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Nero.ger Posted December 30, 2018 Author Posted December 30, 2018 (edited) isnt the MagicMissile on the C101 an older model? also can we get a Bug.Subforum? Edited December 30, 2018 by Nero.ger 'controlling' the Ka50 feels like a discussion with the Autopilot and trim system about the flight direction.
Vibora Posted December 30, 2018 Posted December 30, 2018 The Sidewinder is not used in the C-101CC of the Chilean Airforce IRL. The C-101CC doesn't have a HUD, just a gunsight, so we have modelled the basic functions of old Sidewinders since all AIM-9 have backward capability with old systems, just send growling signal and wiring for power. Roberto "Vibora" Seoane Alas Rojas [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Nero.ger Posted December 30, 2018 Author Posted December 30, 2018 (edited) :mad:that i very tragic...cause i bought this plane partly because of its abilitys to carry and fire aim9m (as an all aspect missle) but the missile should growl and lock itself without the ability of the plane, so it should be an all aspect even in the c101 Edited December 30, 2018 by Nero.ger 'controlling' the Ka50 feels like a discussion with the Autopilot and trim system about the flight direction.
Rex854Warrior Posted December 30, 2018 Posted December 30, 2018 (edited) isnt the MagicMissile on the C101 an older model? also can we get a Bug.Subforum? The R.550 Magic II is the only Magic variant modelled in game, both by ED and Razbam. Although the ED developped missile is really underperforming, barely hitting anything further then 2 miles head on. I'd have to do more tests to give you some accurate numbers but compared to the Razbam missile that can hit targets 8-9nm away when the closure speed is high and at high altitude, there is definitely a massive gap. I couldn't find data on what Magic variant the C-101 carries, but like the sidewinder I suspect the MkII is backwards compatible with MkI launchers and hardware. Edited December 30, 2018 by Rex854Warrior [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
RED Posted December 30, 2018 Posted December 30, 2018 the missile should growl and lock itself without the ability of the plane, so it should be an all aspect even in the c101 That's what I thought, too. Is the CC modeled primarily after the Chilean licensed version? If they didn't carry the AIM-9, did they carry other missiles?
Rudel_chw Posted December 30, 2018 Posted December 30, 2018 Is the CC modeled primarily after the Chilean licensed version? If they didn't carry the AIM-9, did they carry other missiles? On chilean service they used the Rafael Shafrir 2, as they were less expensive and not subjected to US embargoes. For work: iMac mid-2010 of 27" - Core i7 870 - 6 GB DDR3 1333 MHz - ATI HD5670 - SSD 256 GB - HDD 2 TB - macOS High Sierra For Gaming: 34" Monitor - Ryzen 3600 - 32 GB DDR4 2400 - nVidia RTX2080 - SSD 1.25 TB - HDD 10 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Cougar Mobile: iPad Pro 12.9" of 256 GB
Recommended Posts