Biga42 Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 Although the target was assigned via TGP the AGM 65F is hitting other nearby target, any one experienced this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arturojgt Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Yes, I think that we see the target trough TGP but is too far away and close together at the maximum range that maybe the IR head is picking the wrong but it seems ok to us because we are seeing the correct one in the TGP. Dream Commodore 64C, 1530 datasette, 1541 floppy disk drive, DCS cartridge, competition pro joystick, 14” Tv with VCR. Arturo "Chaco" Gonzalez Thomas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harker Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Depressing the TDC with the TGP simply designates a point and the Maverick seeker is slaved to that point. That is all. After that, the missile seeker is free to lock whatever it sees. It's your job to verify the target via the IMAV page and make manual adjustments if needed. The vCVW-17 is looking for Hornet and Tomcat pilots and RIOs. Join the vCVW-17 Discord. F/A-18C, F-15E, AV-8B, F-16C, JF-17, A-10C/CII, M-2000C, F-14, AH-64D, BS2, UH-1H, P-51D, Sptifire, FC3 - i9-13900K, 64GB @6400MHz RAM, 4090 Strix OC, Samsung 990 Pro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biga42 Posted November 20, 2019 Author Share Posted November 20, 2019 (edited) See the picture, although the TGP is locking the target, the AGM seeker head is point to the point were the the TGP's TDC depress was push, the seeker head does not slaved to TGP track target...what am I doing wrong? Edited November 20, 2019 by Biga42 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Team NineLine Posted November 20, 2019 ED Team Share Posted November 20, 2019 DO you have a track you can share of the issue? Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biga42 Posted November 20, 2019 Author Share Posted November 20, 2019 Same with A100 the same with A10C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zarma Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 See the picture, although the TGP is locking the target, the AGM seeker head is point to the point were the the TGP's TDC depress was push, the seeker head does not slaved to TGP track target...what am I doing wrong? Because in the Hornet the "weapon designate point" isnt moving like the SPI in the A10C. If the target of the point mode is moving you have to re-designate from time to time. i9 9900k, 64 Go RAM, RTX 4090, Warthog HOTAS Throttle & Stick, Virpil AH64 collective, Saitek Combat Rudder, MFD Cougar, Trackir 5 Pro, Multipurpose UFC, Alain Dufour's TEDAC and Oculus Rift S (when I want some VR), http://www.twitch.tv/zarma4074 / https://www.youtube.com/user/Zarma4074 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biga42 Posted November 20, 2019 Author Share Posted November 20, 2019 Zarma, please explain... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramsay Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Zarma, please explain... In the A-10C when the TGP is set as the SPI generator, the TGP constantly updates the SPI (sensor point of interest) and any sensors slaved to the SPI i.e. the maverick, also track the updated SPI. That doesn't happen in the Hornet. TDC designate creates a Target Point (you can think of it as special kind of mark point that has fields for weapon data). So using the TGP, to lock a moving vehicle, TDC creates a 'fixed' Target Point that isn't updated automatically. Hence the need to slew the Maverick's IR seeker onto the target. When the TGP is point tracking a moving vehicle, it won't update/create the target point until TDC depress is used. i9 9900K @4.8GHz, 64GB DDR4, RTX4070 12GB, 1+2TB NVMe, 6+4TB HD, 4+1TB SSD, Winwing Orion 2 F-15EX Throttle + F-16EX Stick, TPR Pedals, TIR5, Win 10 Pro x64, 1920X1080 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biga42 Posted November 21, 2019 Author Share Posted November 21, 2019 ok, I got it and worked!! thanks! But..is this a bug or it's the way hornet does it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harker Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 ok, I got it and worked!! thanks! But..is this a bug or it's the way hornet does it?AFAIK, the Hornet doesn't use SPI logic, like the A-10C does, so you can't create "movable" target points slaved to the TGP. Might be different with the AG radar, I don't know. The vCVW-17 is looking for Hornet and Tomcat pilots and RIOs. Join the vCVW-17 Discord. F/A-18C, F-15E, AV-8B, F-16C, JF-17, A-10C/CII, M-2000C, F-14, AH-64D, BS2, UH-1H, P-51D, Sptifire, FC3 - i9-13900K, 64GB @6400MHz RAM, 4090 Strix OC, Samsung 990 Pro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamilton Posted November 22, 2019 Share Posted November 22, 2019 See the picture, although the TGP is locking the target, the AGM seeker head is point to the point were the the TGP's TDC depress was push, the seeker head does not slaved to TGP track target...what am I doing wrong? the same with A10C I´m also having exactly the same problem described with both F-18C and A-10C. Thanks. _________________________________ Aorus Z390 Extreme MB | i9 9900k CPU @ 5.0 GHz | EVGA RTX 2080 Ti FTW3 Ultra | 32 GB G Skill Trident Z 3600 MHz CL14 DDR4 Ram | Corsair H150i Pro Cooler | Corsair TX 850M PS | Samsung 970 Evo Plus M.2 NVMe SSD 1TB |TMWH Hotas with VPC WarBRD Base| Corsair Gamer 570x Crystal Case | HP Reverb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harker Posted November 23, 2019 Share Posted November 23, 2019 I just tested the A-10C and it works fine. I set up a moving vehicle, used the TGP in point track, TMS Up Long and now the TGP is generating the SPI. I then slaved the Maverick seeker to the SPI with China Hat Fwd Long and the seeker followed the SPI along its path. Maybe you missed a step in the procedure. The reason the Hornet cannot do that is that, as mentioned above, it can't use the TGP to continuously update the target point. I see no bug here, at least according to the capabilities of the DCS Hornet. And the A-10C is fine too. The vCVW-17 is looking for Hornet and Tomcat pilots and RIOs. Join the vCVW-17 Discord. F/A-18C, F-15E, AV-8B, F-16C, JF-17, A-10C/CII, M-2000C, F-14, AH-64D, BS2, UH-1H, P-51D, Sptifire, FC3 - i9-13900K, 64GB @6400MHz RAM, 4090 Strix OC, Samsung 990 Pro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biga42 Posted November 24, 2019 Author Share Posted November 24, 2019 Yes...in A10 it works perfectly!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
discwalker Posted November 26, 2019 Share Posted November 26, 2019 (edited) In Hornet not perfect Lock can permamently jump after 1 sec from the tank to the nearby lightpole for example. (I can only extlemely close range point the seeker to the tank if 5 meters nearby a lightpole exists. EDIT: ) In the attached degraded mission first play time I cannot hit the BUK launcher (Near Kobuleti, in the X airport) because mavF seeker cannot decide the lock between a tiny nothing and the big vehicle. Two actual flights in the track. The second with a launch and an accidental hit from CLOSE.2,5,5,39384_MAVF_cant_make_decision_when_tiny_object_is_close-2flight.trk Edited November 26, 2019 by discwalker youtube example of trouble locking up a terget GTX 1070 8GB, 16GB DDR3, W8.1 on SSD, DCS on another SSD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Team NineLine Posted November 26, 2019 ED Team Share Posted November 26, 2019 Lock can permamently jump after 1 sec from the tank to the nearby lightpole for example. (I can only extlemely close range point the seeker to the tank if 5 meters nearby a lightpole exists.) In the attached degraded mission first play time I cannot hit the BUK launcher (Near Kobuleti, in the X airport) because mavF seeker cannot decide the lock between a tiny nothing and the big vehicle. Two actual flights in the track. The second with a launch and an accidental hit from CLOSE. The maverick doesn't know the difference between a tank and a light pole and only likes what it likes, it can't make decisions, that is your job as a pilot. I have even seen a video of a pilot swearing at his Mavericks as he has trouble locking up a target. These weapons are not magic superweapons, they are faillable. Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts