Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

OT: Yeah Poland is proud to have F-16... and trouble with pilots' trainings, service, and often damages... IMO we bought it cause our government wanna to get into favour of USA. Polish odd practices. But pictures pretty.

Reminder: Fighter pilots make movies. Bomber pilots make... HISTORY! :D | Also to be remembered: FRENCH TANKS HAVE ONE GEAR FORWARD AND FIVE BACKWARD :D

ಠ_ಠ



Posted
OT: Yeah Poland is proud to have F-16... and trouble with pilots' trainings, service, and often damages... IMO we bought it cause our government wanna to get into favour of USA. Polish odd practices. But pictures pretty.

 

I hear they are not very pleased with them. Especially when they compared them to A versions of Mig29.

Posted
I hear they are not very pleased with them. Especially when they compared them to A versions of Mig29.
Oh yes, the F-16 have so tiny radar, so short range, so weak BVR armament, and its ECM suit is nonexistant... Bravo Sierra

 

Actually, comparing Polish F-16C/D-52+ to our MiG-29As and ex-Gs is like comparing USAF F-22As with F-16As , absolutely no competition. Those Block 52+ Vipers have the best avionics suit available, short of the I, and E/Fs which are way to expensive for what they're capable of. The only true problem is... be bought not enough of them ( 48 ), we need at least twice as much.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

"If a place needs helicopters, it's probably not worth visiting." - Nick Lappos

Posted
cf16fq6.jpg

 

I think this photo is not all correct. I know for a fact block 40/42 and 50/52 with CCIP (Common Configuration Implementation Program) have a ASHM (aft seat heads up monitor) Sorry, just my two cents

 

PS great photos, I love that paint skim. Are dose f-16 block 52 or 52+

To whom it may concern,

I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that.

Thank you for you patience.

 

 

Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..

  • 3 months later...
Posted

Man, I don't care what anyone says. The F-16 is a beautiful aircraft. From a to e model. From Blk 1 to 60

To whom it may concern,

I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that.

Thank you for you patience.

 

 

Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..

Posted

Boberro are you saying you're not happy with your F-16 fleet?!

 

What's the general opininon in Poland on F-16 after first year of use?!

 

I ask because my homeland Croatia also seems interested in upgrading it's fleet of MiG-21 Fishbeds and we've got JAS-39 and F-16 to choose between.

 

Knowing the buttkiss policy of my country I assume it's gonna end up with F-16 (20+ YO airframes that noone considers safe no more) so I'm just interested how things are in Poland.

 

BTW Kusch, THX for a nice pics and news as usual!

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted

I'm pretty sure the Polish military is happy with the F-16s, and only those who don't really know a thing are saying silly things like MiG-29A's are better. The MiG-29A barely gets 3 WP's to navigate to, and it needs NDB's to locate itself while at it - that's just on the navigation side.

 

As for F-16 vs. JAS-39, there really isn't a functional difference IMHO. In fact, I'm fairly certain the F-16 has a greater TWR and useful payload, and probably greater range too, depending on how exactly you load it out. In addition, the F-16 has a more varied payload capability, from what I can tell.

  • Like 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D

I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...