Jump to content

War in Georgia, photo and video only [No discussion]


Kusch

Recommended Posts

Thermaltake Kandalf LCS | Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R | Etasis ET750 (850W Max) | i7-920 OC to 4.0 GHz | Gigabyte HD5850 | OCZ Gold 6GB DDR3 2000 | 2 X 30GB OCZ Vertex SSD in RAID 0 | ASUS VW266H 25.5" | LG Blue Ray 10X burner | TIR 5 | Saitek X-52 Pro | Logitech G930 | Saitek Pro flight rudder pedals | Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Remains of Georgian Su-25 shot down by Ossetian rebels or peacekeeping forces (MS) near the road between Tshinvali and Djava. On the other hand it's still unclear who's plane is it - It can be either Georgian or Russian.

 

50905594.jpg

 

70954077.jpg

 

48954620.jpg

 

96851782.jpg

  • Like 1

МАССАНДРА: "Микоян Артём Славный Сын Армянского Народа Дарит Радость Авиаторам".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
Weapons confiscated from looters in Gori, Georgia.

 

685550m.jpg

 

I see weapons of XXI century :D

Reminder: Fighter pilots make movies. Bomber pilots make... HISTORY! :D | Also to be remembered: FRENCH TANKS HAVE ONE GEAR FORWARD AND FIVE BACKWARD :D

ಠ_ಠ



Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Kutaisi AB

 

Anyone knows why they didn't bomb the runway the "right" direction?

Google Earth: 42°10'35.33"N 42°28'51.87"E

 

 

rwyz.png

 

 

I wonder how this building looks like...

 

closeh.png

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Waiting to build a F/A-18C home-pit...

ex - Swiss Air Force Pilatus PC-21 Ground Crew

SFM? AFM? EFM?? What's this?

 

 

i7-5960X (8 core @3.00GHz)¦32GB DDR4 RAM¦Asus X99-WS/IPMI¦2x GTX970 4GB SLI¦Samsung 850 PRO 512GB SSD¦TrackIR 5 Pro¦TM Warthog¦MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Anyone knows why they didn't bomb the runway the "right" direction?

What nscode said.

 

If you bomb along the length of the runway then if you are lucky all the bombs hit. But if you are unlucky and a little to one side or the other then they all miss.

To be sure of a hit you drop a stick of bombs across the runway with the gap between bombs less than the width of the runway and try to put the middle of the stick on the target. Ideally they should have attacked at more of an angle to be sure. There might have been nearby terrain or defences that affected that decision.

 

Years ago, I posted something about dropping sticks of bombs that is kind of relevant, here it is again.

 

Automatic multiple bomb release or "ripple".

 

Why do ground attack aircraft like the A-10 have an automatic system to drop a ripple of bombs, why not just let the pilot press the weapon release several times? To answer this question, you need to think about a real life target attack.

 

A single dumb bomb dropped from an aircraft does not drop perfectly down onto the target every time. It may drift left or right of the track that the aircraft is flying and miss the target. If the bomb is dropped a little early or a little late then it will miss short or long. The likelyhood of missing short or long is more than missing left/right.

 

Imagine an aircraft flying at 500 kts = 6078ft * 500 = 3039000 ft/hr. Divide by 60*60 gives ft/sec = approx 850.

If the pilot initiates bomb release 0.5s early or late he will likely miss by over 400ft.

 

So lets make our bomb "longer" by dropping a ripple of (eg) five bombs. If we know the lethal radius of the bomb blast is eg. 50ft, then if we drop them 100 feet apart, we have now a "longer bomb" with a lethal area of 100ft wide by 500ft long.

If we aim to land the middle (3rd) bomb of the stick of 5 on the target, then we have 250ft of leeway short and long and still destroy the target.

This deals effectively with the short / long problem, but we still might miss left / right.

If we are attacking a small point target like a truck, then nothing we can do, but if our target is of significant dimensions like a bridge or runway, we can increase our hit chances.

 

Suppose our target is a river bridge that is 500 feet long and 50 feet wide. If we attack along the length of the bridge we might be lucky and all 5 bombs hit it, or we might be unlucky and all of them miss left or right, then all that happens is the bridge gets a bit wet!

If we attack at 90 degress to the bridge then our bomb to bomb gap is 100 ft and the bridge 50ft wide, 50/50 chance of a hit.

If we attack at an angle of 30 degrees, then simple maths tells us that bridge "appears" to be 100ft wide and we are certain one bomb will hit provided we can put the ripple on target regarding short/long. The more bombs in our stick then the better our chances of getting it right as regards short/long.

  • Like 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Sorry Death, you lose! It was Professor Plum....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with planes there is always a risk pilot gets captured . could be desastrous on a political level

Its a tradeoff of risks. Pilots getting captured is always a risk. If you want to negate that risk to Zero percent you not have war jets nor choppers. :) The small risk to the pilot vs the expense of a 3 cruise missiles (there were 3 visible bombing runs on that airport)... Its an easy choice.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...