Jump to content

Targeting Pods


Ryanwtod

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Fri13 said:

We should get three targeting pods for Hornet.

 

*snip*

 

3) AN/AAS-38 Nite Hawk

 

*snip*

 

And as anything, if NAVFLIR is technically possible be used, it should be regardless of politics.

 

I think by now we can be pretty sure that both of these things will not happen.


Edited by Shimmergloom667

i7 - 9700K | 32 GB DDR4 3200 | RTX 2080 | VKB Gunfighter Mk II /w MCG Pro | Virpil T-50CM2 Throttle | TrackIR 5 | VKB Mk. IV

 

AJS-37 | A/V-8B | A-10C | F-14A/B | F-16C | F-18C | F-86F | FC3 | JF-17 | Ka-50 | L-39 | Mi-8 | MiG-15bis | MiG-19 | MiG-21bis | M2000-C | P-51D | Spitfire LF Mk. IX | UH-1H

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shimmergloom667 said:

 

I think by now we can be pretty sure that both of these things will not happen.

 

 

I think that there is like a 1-2% change that either one would be implemented. 

i7-8700k, 32GB 2666Mhz DDR4, 2x 2080S SLI 8GB, Oculus Rift S.

i7-8700k, 16GB 2666Mhz DDR4, 1080Ti 11GB, 27" 4K, 65" HDR 4K.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which equals "pretty sure that it's not happening" on my planet 😄

i7 - 9700K | 32 GB DDR4 3200 | RTX 2080 | VKB Gunfighter Mk II /w MCG Pro | Virpil T-50CM2 Throttle | TrackIR 5 | VKB Mk. IV

 

AJS-37 | A/V-8B | A-10C | F-14A/B | F-16C | F-18C | F-86F | FC3 | JF-17 | Ka-50 | L-39 | Mi-8 | MiG-15bis | MiG-19 | MiG-21bis | M2000-C | P-51D | Spitfire LF Mk. IX | UH-1H

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if we did get the NiteHawk, which version should it be?

 

The original, no target designator/ranger/LST? The A model, which added self designation, or the B, which added LST? If it's either of the first two, you'd really need the ASQ-173 LST pod modeled as well.

 

There's probably just as many different opinions on this as there are the current pods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, norman99 said:

Even if we did get the NiteHawk, which version should it be?

 

The original, no target designator/ranger/LST? The A model, which added self designation, or the B, which added LST? If it's either of the first two, you'd really need the ASQ-173 LST pod modeled as well.

 

There's probably just as many different opinions on this as there are the current pods.

 

the one that would have still been in operational use in 2005. Easiest of Course would be to just got for the AN/AAS38B since that would not require a second LST pod like the A model. ( because at that point ATFLIR was around in relatively small  quantities)


Edited by Kev2go

 

Build:

 

Windows 10 64 bit Pro

Case/Tower: Corsair Graphite 760tm ,Asus Strix Z790 Motherboard, Intel Core i7 12700k ,Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 64gb ram (3600 mhz) , (Asus strix oc edition) Nvidia RTX 3080 12gb , Evga g2 850 watt psu, Hardrives ; Samsung 970 EVo, , Samsung evo 860 pro 1 TB SSD, Samsung evo 850 pro 1TB SSD,  WD 1TB HDD

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...